|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#106
|
||||
|
||||
1914 OWS Enigma
There are two parts to this puzzle :
Part 1 The 1914 enamel OWS badge is routinely referred to as the "Admiralty Badge" but recently I (unsuccessfully) put a bid on a badge that has "Admiralty" where the date is normally seen and no enamel. It had a stamped/impressed number on the back (on badge not on fitting) but no makers mark. Bosley's has a similar nickle plated badge. Questions : Is this the original style or one of the later issues ? ................Were there two different types of badges (Admiralty/1914) ? From Tony James article : "The Admiralty badges were initially un-numbered . This was later rectified with the issue of numbered badges in early 1916 to replace those un-numbered ones." Question : Is this accurate and does it refer to only the "Admiralty" badges or the 1914 ones ...or both ? Would they actually replace 99,999+ badges ? Part 2 Another recent acquisition , a 1914 OWS with no enamel. It has makers mark (DG COLLINS LONDON) , number on button hole fitting (62341) and has a 'raised' letter B on the badge itself (like series mark on 1915 badges). Questions : Is this simply a manufacturing error or were some badges made without enamel (economy version) ? ................ Could the letter B indicate that more than one series of this badge was produced ? Original series numbered 1- 99,999 then B series (economy version ?) starting .................again at 1 ? NB. Enamel badge I have has number A68320 stamped on button hole fitting , anyone got enamel badge with either B on fitting or 'raised' on actual badge. .
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#107
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Mike,
I'll kick it off... Part 1, I sadly have no idea, but these silver/nickel badges seem to be very rare, and I am not convinced they formed part of the OWS set. That said, they could have been made for a very small select group, hence the rarity. I also think Tony is referring to the 1914 enamelled badges, as far as I am aware, they have always been referred to as "Admiralty" badges. Be interesting to see if anyone had better info there. Part 2: I think the enamel has just been removed, the spaces around the date seem to have some residual enamel, to my eyes, anyway. As for the raised B, from my observations, Collins badges (on the button hole fitting) come blank, stamped A and stamped B, along with the number, but not sure about the raised letter.... may need more opinions there... On another note, I have very much enjoyed this thread, I have not contributed much, as I've been away, enjoying the mountains before we are put back in our box for the winter.... apparently France has another lockdown coming.... Cheers, Tim |
#108
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It seems too much of a coincidence that there was an "Admiralty" badge and a 1914 badge referred to as "the Admiralty badge". Quote:
Tony's (2012) article is based on Tom Tulluch-Marshall's earlier (2001) piece (with a nod to this forum ) but I find it strange that Tom mentions 'official' and 'unofficial' OWS badges but does not refer at all to the silver "Admiralty" one. Also worth noting is that when Tony's article came out there was still conjecture about the letters on the 1915 badges with the idea they were 'occupation related' (rather than purely based on a numerical series). Quote:
I have seen a blank Collins OWS (note MM) and 'A' & 'B' raised letters on the badge itself. The numbers/letter on the button hole fittings are 'post manufacture' where as the 'raised' letters are part of the original manufacturing process (like the ones on the various 'series' of 1915 badges). So another enigma ! A final (appropriate) quote from Tony's article : "So , nearly a hundred years on , there are still questions to be asked and research to be done" .
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#109
|
||||
|
||||
Hi all
I have a couple of those silver-looking Admiralty badges and one has traces of a black paint in the outer circle. I will post photos of them later. The 1914 enamel badges seem to have come in for quite a few modifications as I've got them with white paint (not enamel, although it may be enamel paint.... ) in the centre of the badge and also a red enamel (of the vitreous sort!) behind the crown and also ones with the paint left over from doing up the local post box! Then you have the ones that have had the half moon cut off and a pin put in its place or the one I posted a photo of with a dear little frame to hold the badge. I guess that this is what keeps us busy.... |
#110
|
||||
|
||||
I'm guessing you've got the "HMNZ Transports badge" that is a similar style to the silver "Admiralty" one , they are also quite rare over here and go for £80.00 - £100.00.
I wonder if some of the 'painted' modifications were done to make the badges look more like the earlier 'unofficial' ones ? Here is a horrific modification (on eBay at the moment) , button hole fitting removed and lugs/loops added !
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#111
|
||||
|
||||
After rereading Tom Tulloch-Marshall's article I found probable answers to my own questions.
Quote:
'It was thought that 500,000' unnumbered Admiralty badges had been issued , of which 150,000 had been replaced with numbered badges by July 1916." NB. This was also the period of inspections with some workers being 'unbadged' and eligible for conscription. This does however pose another question , were the badges actually "recalled and replaced" (costly and administratively/logistically difficult ?) or simply stamped/numbered locally and returned to the worker (with details name/number/occupation recorded). Quote:
So my badge isn't some unrecorded 'variation' and most probably simply had the enamel removed. .
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#112
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Guys
just loving the info and the intrigue of this thread. Mike, I like the idea the silver ones (in a colour sense) may have been for a small select group, hence the low numbers and scarcity. Not unlike the Female AIF headquarters badges, somewhat scarce, but there were 2 issued, the first almost impossible to find - both the badge and any info on it. Half the fun here is the robust exchange of ideas and hypothesis, regardless if it ever goes conclusive. cheers, Tim |
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Gentlemen, I would be interested to see your viewpoint on the following eBay listing......mmmmm!
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1915-WW1-...oAAOSwKwZfmuPS
__________________
He who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead; his eyes are closed. (Albert Einstein) |
#114
|
||||
|
||||
It's already on my "watch list" , it's a 1915 enamel version with the enamel removed (some specs of blue and white visible in close-up).
At first I thought it was an 'unvoided' manufacturing error but Gaunt makers mark on back of crown is the same as on my enamel one. .
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#115
|
||||
|
||||
Yep, I agree.
Quote:
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
That was the conclusion that I came to after reading the preceding posts in the thread in respect of the 1914 badge. The colouring on this badge was odd but the only explanation for the lack of voiding was that it started life as an enamelled badge. I commend your excellent eyesight...I did not see the traces of enamel. What bemuses and intrigues me is why someone would remove the enamel? I wish you luck Mike if you are considering bidding.
Cheers James
__________________
He who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead; his eyes are closed. (Albert Einstein) |
#117
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I've no plans to bid , just 'watching' to see how much it eventually goes for. NB - I have put bids (and won) a badge with serious damage to the enamel but that was a British Legion "For Merit" badge. This is the Legion's highest award , the BL version was only issued/awarded from 1960-1971 (then RBL version) and not many would have been awarded during that period. So , purchased as a 'place holder' until I can find a good quality one. .
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative. Poppy and British Legion Wanted |
#118
|
||||
|
||||
That does seem sensible and makes a great deal of sense.
Cheers James
__________________
He who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead; his eyes are closed. (Albert Einstein) |
#119
|
||||
|
||||
Hi all
Boy, am I enjoying this discussion! I did see that eBay 1915 badge and would agree that there is a speck of blue and a little bit of white enamel visible in the photos. The colour change in what should be enameled tells you that it has spent a lot of its life protected by blue/ white enamel. For what it is worth, I once picked up a couple of badges from a guy who did metal detecting. They weren't OWS badges but the original would have been enameled and these were no longer so. He thought that they had been put in a rubbish fire and then buried with the scraps. I later saw an extremely rare badge for a New Zealand Anti-German League (rare, rare, rare!). The detectorist later sold this "dug" example for a fabulous sum... The "HMNZ Transports" badge does indeed follow the 1914 Admiralty pattern and exist in both enamel and a plain version. The theory is that the enamel one was for officers and the enamel hue is a lighter blue than you see on the British version. Anyone interested in an example could PM me for an example at a much lower figure. I was intrigued to see that a well-known website (not eBay) is claiming that these badges were worn by individuals providing transport for the wounded (the ambulances being "transport"......). Much as I respect the opinions of this site, I feel that this is an interesting theory for which I would like to see definitive proof. |
#120
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I could see that being worn as a spurious cap badge(?) by someone who felt it lent them some authority. |
|
|