British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Anodised Aluminium Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-01-14, 03:35 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default Manchester Regiment

Gentlemen,
Just how scarce a badge is the Manchester Regt in Anodised form and what are the dates that it was actually in wear by the regiment?
Kind regards to you all,
Frank
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-01-14, 04:11 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,790
Default

£40 scarce,
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-01-14, 04:38 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Not a cheap one then?
Having said that I know many command a far higher price, anybody any ideas on the dates it was actually being worn?

Last edited by Frank Kelley; 18-01-14 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-01-14, 05:04 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,371
Default

Strangely, according to K and K vol 2 , the anodised badge was sealed in 1964 but the regulars ceased wearing it on amalgamation with the Kings in 1958.

The Manchester Territorials wore it until around 1969.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-01-14, 05:05 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,711
Default

Which maker is it Frank,the Grove MFG example with metal slider usually fetches a slightly higher price.Id say £50 but all depends on the who bids on it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-01-14, 05:09 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hell Peter,
Very many thanks that is the thing that always gets me about sealed pattern dates, anyway it certainly makes sense and was the particular information that I wanted, any idea when they went from metal to anodised, was thinking 1953 perhaps?
Kind regards Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Strangely, according to K and K vol 2 , the anodised badge was sealed in 1964 but the regulars ceased wearing it on amalgamation with the Kings in 1958.

The Manchester Territorials wore it until around 1969.

P.B.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-01-14, 05:12 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hello Mike,
I don't actually have one yet!
But, I do like the Manchester's, mainly because of the 1st Battalions defence of Ladysmith on the 6th of January 1900!
Regards Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike H View Post
Which maker is it Frank,the Grove MFG example with metal slider usually fetches a slightly higher price.Id say £50 but all depends on the who bids on it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-01-14, 05:27 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Kelley View Post
Hell Peter,
Very many thanks that is the thing that always gets me about sealed pattern dates, anyway it certainly makes sense and was the particular information that I wanted, any idea when they went from metal to anodised, was thinking 1953 perhaps?
Kind regards Frank
A decade later. It is not that uncommon for a/a infantry badges to have mid-60s dates and were worn by TA and Cadets only.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-01-14, 05:43 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hello Alan,
Are you saying that the 1st battalion never actually wore the anodised badge?
Regards Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan O View Post
A decade later. It is not that uncommon for a/a infantry badges to have mid-60s dates and were worn by TA and Cadets only.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-01-14, 05:51 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,371
Default

Alan ,
It may of course be incorrect but this article from the "White Horse and Fleur de Lys " magazine of Autumn 1974 suggests 1957 for the issue of the anodised badge.

P.B.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2021.jpg (65.9 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2022.jpg (75.5 KB, 24 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18-01-14, 05:59 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hello Peter,
That is very helpful, so they would seem to have worn the white metal badge for quite some time and I assume in Malaya too.
Kind regards again Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Alan ,
It may of course be incorrect but this article from the "White Horse and Fleur de Lys " magazine of Autumn 1974 suggests 1957 for the issue of the anodised badge.

P.B.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18-01-14, 06:39 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,790
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Alan ,
It may of course be incorrect but this article from the "White Horse and Fleur de Lys " magazine of Autumn 1974 suggests 1957 for the issue of the anodised badge.

P.B.
Peter,

If the 1957 date was right why chrome the TA's badges in badges in 1958? Why give the Regulars a/a badges and them deny them to the TA? Easier to give the TA a/a rather than chrome their metal badges?

Alan
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18-01-14, 06:52 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Gentlemen,
Interestingly, volume 2 of K and K also mentions the badges of the 8th and 9th Battalions being chrome plated in 1959, this cannot be just a myth?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-01-14, 07:10 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,790
Default

Without knowing where Kipling got his info from it is impossible to verify the story. They may have read the same article. It's quite possible for a TA Bn to have chromed badges for the parade - but why bother if there are several hundred a/a badges on the shelves?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18-01-14, 07:30 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,371
Default

I understand as another example (and from their Curator who was a member of the regiment ) that the Liverpool Scottish were sent anodised badges but refused to change from the metal ones being worn, the anodised ones being given to the Cadets.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.