British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19-06-22, 12:52 PM
Hawthorn Hawthorn is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 856
Default Kent Volunteer Fencibles - E.K.V.R.

Hopefully some of you may find this an interesting photographic postcard showing a Volunteer Kent Unit.

Having studied the cap badges I believe them to be for the Kent Volunteer Fencibles however the reverse of the card details the Unit as B Company, No 1 Platoon, E.K.V.R. (East Kent Volunteer Reserve?)

Although its difficult to fully make it out the bass drum bears the Horse of Kent within a circlet with 'M.K.B.' on it, any suggestions welcome re identification and deciphering the other details?

The two Officers and the Warrant Officer wear different cap badges which I have not yet positively identified.

The clothing of the young boys seated at the front is also quite interesting in that one wears a full uniform matching that of the adults, the lad second from the right wears a very small Kent Horse style cap badge and the boy second from the left wears an unidentified lapel badge.

The light machine gun at the front is I believe a Hotchkiss M1909 model.

An interesting image and would welcome any observations .

Regards, Simon.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg EKVR.jpg (88.3 KB, 51 views)
File Type: jpg EKVR 3.jpg (80.1 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg EKVR 2.jpg (40.0 KB, 30 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-06-22, 12:56 PM
Hawthorn Hawthorn is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 856
Default

Unsure why the last image is in portrait and not landscape, apologies.

Simon.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-06-22, 02:12 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,452
Default

Love the inscription: ‘I have just spotted an aeroplane.

Wonderful.

JT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-06-22, 03:01 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,452
Default

Great photo, Simon.

A couple of the chaps are wearing Sgt. chevrons. To the best of my knowledge, this was not permitted within the VTC:

'The accepted military ranks and titles will not be used or recognised, and no uniform is to be worn except where necessary for training.' *

Simon - Sgt.jpg

As we know, the VTC had their own cuff lace rank system too:

VTC Ranks.jpg

Also, the drum appears to say '8th' (possibly), before the MKB, and 'Coy' after it. Just an added observation:

AE3A5AEC-009D-4D32-A1B5-8C48D3363DB6.jpg

The buttons appear to be black 'rifles' buttons, but could equally be the so-called 'football' buttons often seen worn on the VTC uniform.

CLNG b4.jpg

Thanks for sharing.

JT


* Source: 'Uniforms of the Volunteers 1914-19', The Journal of the Society for Army Historical research, Autumn 1938, Vol.17, No.67, pp. 163-170.

Last edited by Jelly Terror; 19-06-22 at 03:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-06-22, 03:04 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,400
Default

I don't recognise the LMG but that would make it WW1 era: East Kent Volunteer Regiment is a contender for EKVR rather than Reserves.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-06-22, 03:05 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,400
Default

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotchk...kiss_M1909.png

There you go. The LMG is French so I would suggest the photo must be 1915-16.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-06-22, 03:52 PM
Hawthorn Hawthorn is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 856
Default

JT and Alan,

Many thanks for your observations, very interesting. 8th M.K.B. Company throws up nothing obvious with a Web search or within my limited reference Library however a good starting point for future research.

I do enjoy these group photographs and the research potential they provide.

Simon.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-06-22, 04:14 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,400
Default

Simon

I don't think that there is any doubt they are VTC from the details in the photo. The VTCs are not well recorded because they were semi-official at best and being self-funded volunteers had a lot of variance in their dress. The French MG is an oddity and you do wonder where they got it from.

Alan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-06-22, 04:19 PM
Hawthorn Hawthorn is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 856
Default

Alan,

I agree, wonder where they obtained such a weapon and obviously proud to show off their Unit's new found firepower with it displayed front and centre of the group.

Simon.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-06-22, 04:26 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,452
Default

Just wondering if it could be late-1916 around the transitional period from VTC to VF?

At that time the War Office announced that officers and other ranks were now to wear the same badges of rank as those worn by the Regular Army, though all ranks were to wear the Royal Arms as their cap badge.

It’s an interesting subject.

JT
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-06-22, 04:39 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,400
Default

Quite possibly. I have read a thesis on the VTC in the library at JSCSC at Shrivenham. It was superbly researched and recorded the problem of uniforms being changed over in 1916 without adequate funding. The VTC bought their own (not khaki as they were forbidden to wear it as VTC) in 1915 and some resorted to dying their uniforms when they moved to VB status. The officers are in khaki which suggest you are exactly right in your date.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19-06-22, 04:45 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11,400
Default

Late 1916 or later would also explain the Army ranks being worn.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 19-06-22, 05:21 PM
Rob Miller's Avatar
Rob Miller Rob Miller is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Devonshire
Posts: 2,025
Default

I believe we had some .303 Hotchkiss machine guns pretty early in WW1, I think I remember they were intended for Cavalry use but were then issued to Army Cyclists and fitted in some tanks?

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 19-06-22, 05:29 PM
mike_vee's Avatar
mike_vee mike_vee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 3,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Miller View Post
I believe we had some .303 Hotchkiss machine guns pretty early in WW1, I think I remember they were intended for Cavalry use but were then issued to Army Cyclists and fitted in some tanks?

Rob
First produced in France in 1914 then :

Quote:
The following year, the British government invited Hotchkiss to set up a factory in Coventry. By the end of the war, this factory had manufactured over 40,000 M1909s.

.
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative.

Poppy and British Legion Wanted
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 19-06-22, 06:49 PM
magpie's Avatar
magpie magpie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,848
Default

40,000 produced in Coventry and I'm sure these are also used in the early takns along with Lewis guns
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.