|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
May I ask how you know the badge in the original post does not have a sweat hole?
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You are comparing apples to oranges. This ‘curly scroll’ design is pictured in both KK and Gaylor. I strongly believe that like the East Surrey’s, Northants, Suffolks, tagged on scroll RDF and a slew of other badges bearing design mistakes or anomalies it is a WW1 made oddity. Obviously if you want a primary source or picture of it in wear then fair enough I don’t think there is one yet. But like the above badges there is no SP instructing the change. The braze hole question has been well discussed before I would suggest searching Lambourne and Tiptaft WW1 badges to see they were not always used. The badge highlighted in post #1 is found both with and without braze holes from the same die. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
I believe that genuine Leinster Regiment cap badges had a one piece white metal part with two overlays in the form of a title scroll and a crown. The badge shown has an entirely different construction with a separate scroll attached by two tabs. There may be a sweat hole behind the crown but my bet is that there isn't. I am happy to change my opinion if someone can provide photographic evidence.
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yeah, I tried to avoid using the term Economy Issue as I felt that would just conjure up a vision of an all gm badge. I used 'economy measure' instead and hoped you would see it as just another effort to save time and cost during the war effort. The all brass badge wasn't just the only economy drive in badge production and as my knowledge grows I am seeing more and more badge anomalies, not just the ones Luke mentioned, but also where old dies with Victorian crowns were used. Perhaps nobody can change your mind and of course without photographic evidence your stance is quite reasonable. However, all I can say is that most badge books such as KK include it and of course the more responsible militaria auction houses such as Bosleys sell it as an economy 'measure'. They are also quite rare (or at least I haven't personally seen many), so if indeed a fake, the fakers didn't produce many. Ebay isn't overwhelmed with them as it is with the other myriad fakes and indeed the one in post 1 is the only one I've personally seen on there. The whole issue of mass produced WWI badges is becoming a very interesting and consuming topic as some members on here use their forensic skills to expand our knowledge. Cheers Mark Last edited by dubaiguy; 16-02-21 at 02:54 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The ‘curly scroll’ Leinster bears striking resemblance to the below 3DG and 10H badges. Whilst I’ve not compared them in detail yet it is something on my to-do-list. Like these Leinsters the quality in strike and flaws present can vary enormously making fine detailed comparisons harder. However, the coronet’s jewels, reverse scroll impressions and even the sliders found on all three show commonality from examples I’ve seen. Both 3DG and 10H badges feature in Wilkinson, the 3rd DG of this type is shown in KK so I don’t doubt their provenance. I recently purchased an example of each as WW1 variants and curios. I’ve seen examples with braze holes and others without. From a manufacturing perspective if you were already making the below badges and took on a contract for a Leinster badge it would be an expedient, economical and financially attractive proposition to not cut a whole new die but manufacture a tag on scroll. |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Is there documentary evidence that orders for Leinster Regiment badges were placed with Lambourne and, or, Tiptaft. Whilst I have respect for both K&K and Gaylor, neither are infallible. With regard to badge dealers, it is in their interest to promote these badges as genuine and they may well be right in this case, but where is the evidence? I do not like that the badge does not confirm to the designated pattern, particularly with regard to the tips of the shaft of the feathers being in a different metal to the rest of the plumes. I equally do not understand how this pattern is "labour saving" as suggested by another poster, as it has to be brazed together at three points instead of at two points with the original badge. If the Leinster Regiment had continued to exist with the same cap badge into WW2, I would accept that there may well have been construction modifications as with many other regimental cap badges. However, they were a relatively small regiment having fewer service battalions than other regiments and they were disbanded in 1922. I would question the need for a high number of cap badges to be ordered for them compared with larger regiments. Like all of the other disbanded Irish Regiments, their badges are highly sought after and subsequently frequently copied. I have a few photographs of Leinster Regiment soldiers in my collection, and whilst portrait photographs are often unclear with regard to the badges being worn, and given that photographs of Leinster Regiment soldiers are even rarer than Leinster Regiment cap badges, I have not seen any evidence that the cap badge under discussion was ever worn. I am of course happy to be proved wrong. In every one of the photographs below, the plumes are of one piece construction with two overlays. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'll look forward to reading your conclusions when you get round to your to-do-list. Mark |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If, on the other hand, you were a dodgy dealer knocking out fake badges, using the plumes from one particular badge to make several other badges and selling them as "manufacturer's variants", that indeed would be an expedient, economical, and financially attractive proposition. As many of these badges were knocked out in the 1970s, they have been around long enough to have acquired both patina and the much vaunted provenance that it came from an old collection. Caveat emptor. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
I could spend a lot of time explaining and offering comparisons and other points on manufacture however having done that recently in a Lambourne thread and bashed my head off the wall it’s ultimately pointless and not an experience I care to repeat wasting my time when there’s enough relevant information out there if ultimately the only proof that will satisfy you is a photo.
I wasn’t proposing the badge is made by Lambourne or Tiptaft. The latter made very good quality badges so it certainly isn’t then and the former as you know had a bespoke die which you have an example of and also very unique feathers. There were a great many manufacturer in WW1 as inspection of Board of Trade Labour Gazette 1914-19 shows. None of the pictures you show of Leinsters show a 1916 all GM badge being worn yet you show an example as part of your argument? There are many cases of badges sealed not being issued or worn. So does it exist? No photo yet... Cue twilight zone music. If these were knocked out in the 1970s then Hugh King and Gaylor would have bought them brand new. I give both more credit than that. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
The fact still remains that there was an official sealed pattern cap badge for O.R.s which was super ceded by the 1916 E.I. badge.
The Leinster Regiment had two regular battalions, a reserve battalion, two extra reserve battalions, two service battalions and no territorial battalions during the Great War, why did they need a third "economy" three part badge? I used the photographs of 1916 E.I. badges to show that the cap badge in question was not the "standard" E.I. badge. As for potential makers, it was you that mentioned both Lambourne and Tiptaft. My understanding is that there are extant War Office lists of manufactures who were given contracts of each type of badge and the amount to be manufactured. Are there no surviving lists that show who had the Leinster Regiment contract? As to the fake badges being made in the 1970's, Hugh King was known to have been given many examples of fake badges and I believe he also kept a rogue's gallery of fake badges, as many collector's do. No one is suggesting that he bought it from new and, I do not believe that he never acquired another military badge after 31st December 1979. K&K do not go into great descriptive length regarding the two types of Leinster Regiment cap badges that they have illustrations of. The Prince of Wales's Leinster Regiment (Royal Canadians) 1) The Prince of Wales's plumes, coronet and motto. At the base a scroll inscribed The Leinster. Coronet and title scroll in gilding-metal. Plumes and motto in white metal. (Fig.699). 2). As above, but with different form of coronet. (Fig. 700). Gaylor, seems even less sure of himself regarding the cap badge with the separate scroll, which incidentally, is the only example that he illustrates. "During the First World War it would appear that the plumes used in The Welsh Regiment were utilized so that The Leinster badge is sometimes seen with the more common curved scrolls". Military Badge Collecting. John Gaylor. Revised Edition 1977. Page 48. I would respectfully suggest that they are "more common" because they are copies and not of the sealed pattern. Please do not waste any more of your time and please mind your head. It really isn't worth it Best wishes, Simon. Last edited by High Wood; 18-02-21 at 09:40 AM. Reason: Adding sources. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
So in answer to my original question you are merely speculating, I certainly don't think that I have ever seen a single example without a hole.
Quote:
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
The only / first Leinster badge was sealed on 13-02-1897 as Pattern 4492.
BM PoW plumes, with straight straight scrolls. Yes, in 1916 the WO ordered 10,000 Leinster 'all GM' badges (and we have no reason to deny that they WERE produced). I would have thought that there would be quite a few dies used.... I have about 50 4362A/1896 Pattern OR KLR cap badges; there are 18 dies - all of which I am certain that they are genuine. I can spot a KLR "copy" a mile off but I have to admit, I know very little about Leinsters! Last edited by KLR; 03-03-21 at 09:21 AM. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I’ve only just come across this thread.
This example of mine came on a belt of Irish badges, all genuine so I’ve no reason to think this isn’t either. No sweat hole or nib on the plume but a very distinctive slider, Lambourne ? |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
It appears to have a small rectangular hole.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Trust me it doesn’t.
|
|
|