British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-22, 04:26 PM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,406
Default Coldstream Guards sentry

I have to remark on interesting photo, likely sometime from the late 1880s judging by the "tini" rifle.
The guard box is very well worn and used; surprisingly so. One would have thought a replacement would have occurred some time ago.
As is typical from that time, his uniform has a slept in appearance as they were certainly worn far more often than the full dress of today. Note the shoes are very dusty and worn, no clean tarmac in those days. I suspect foot gear did not generally get the polish we are accustomed to seeing in modern times.
I recall Frank Richards relating that the fur fusilier cap issued to him in the RWF was quite worn with bald spots back in early 1900s, and whilst in India, their KD tunics would often get very a good beating by the Dhobi.
Rather different from these days I think.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/a-co...1139233769390/

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-22, 10:01 PM
grumpy grumpy is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

I don't recall that Frank Richards comment regarding headdress. Where does it come from, please?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-04-22, 12:36 AM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,406
Default

I can't recall if it was from Old Soldier Sahib or Old Soldiers Never Die, but I could be mistaken on both as to the origin. I VERY distinctly recall reading it from some old account.

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-22, 04:32 AM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,116
Default

1 RRF Drummers were wearing 1914 and thereabouts dated fur cap's and full dress tunics and trousers during the 1970's, albeit the items were in good order.

Ex Guardsmen will have more knowledge than I do of the state of sentry boxes at Buckingham Palace during the 1970's but I remember the slots in their roofs, caused by sentries forgetting to take a step forward out of the box before presenting arms with bayonet fixed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-22, 08:44 AM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbuehler View Post
I have to remark on interesting photo, likely sometime from the late 1880s judging by the "tini" rifle.
The guard box is very well worn and used; surprisingly so. One would have thought a replacement would have occurred some time ago.
As is typical from that time, his uniform has a slept in appearance as they were certainly worn far more often than the full dress of today. Note the shoes are very dusty and worn, no clean tarmac in those days. I suspect foot gear did not generally get the polish we are accustomed to seeing in modern times.
I recall Frank Richards relating that the fur fusilier cap issued to him in the RWF was quite worn with bald spots back in early 1900s, and whilst in India, their KD tunics would often get very a good beating by the Dhobi.
Rather different from these days I think.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/a-co...1139233769390/

CB

Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
I don't recall that Frank Richards comment regarding headdress. Where does it come from, please?
I recall it too. In the first chapter ‘Enlistment’, of ‘Old Soldier Sahib’ (p.32 in my edition):

‘Every six months a man was entitled to a new pair of boots, and every twelve months a new suit of scarlet, but he had to wait until he had completed twelve months’ service before he was entitled to a proper scarlet tunic of more expensive cloth than the serge he got at first. He also was then issued with a busby, the tall fur head-dress [sic] reserved for Guards and Fusiliers. The ones issued about this time could have done with a little hair-restorer, but they were very light to wear…’

JT

Last edited by Jelly Terror; 09-04-22 at 08:56 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-22, 10:27 AM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh kitchen View Post

Ex Guardsmen will have more knowledge than I do of the state of sentry boxes at Buckingham Palace during the 1970's but I remember the slots in their roofs, caused by sentries forgetting to take a step forward out of the box before presenting arms with bayonet fixed.
Double clicking on the photo brings up some annotation which says the sentry box is at Tower of London. Can imagine it (everything) getting more run down there than Buck Palace.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-22, 01:41 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,116
Default

"He also was then issued with a busby, the tall fur head-dress [sic] reserved for Guards and Fusiliers. The ones issued about this time could have done with a little hair-restorer, but they were very light to wear…’"

I wonder if the hair-restorer comment referred to the length of the fur on the Fusiliers fur cap as compared to that of the Guards, the fur of the Fusiliers caps is shorter.

(A RRF cap of synthetic fur, I don't know the date of manufacture or if it was adopted rather than just used for trials).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2 copy.jpg (64.8 KB, 22 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-04-22, 01:59 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh kitchen View Post
"He also was then issued with a busby, the tall fur head-dress [sic] reserved for Guards and Fusiliers. The ones issued about this time could have done with a little hair-restorer, but they were very light to wear…’"

I wonder if the hair-restorer comment referred to the length of the fur on the Fusiliers fur cap as compared to that of the Guards, the fur of the Fusiliers caps is shorter.

(A RRF cap of synthetic fur, I don't know the date of manufacture or if it was adopted rather than just used for trials).
Ha! Yeah… a bit of inter-regimental fur envy going on ?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-04-22, 02:21 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,116
Default

Oh no, no, only the Guards deserve the soubriquet of "Woodentops".
And their fur cap's are made of proper bear skin whereas only a few dozen acrylics were slaughtered to make that Fusilier Cap I show.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-04-22, 09:30 PM
grumpy grumpy is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leigh kitchen View Post
"He also was then issued with a busby, the tall fur head-dress [sic] reserved for Guards and Fusiliers. The ones issued about this time could have done with a little hair-restorer, but they were very light to wear…’"

I wonder if the hair-restorer comment referred to the length of the fur on the Fusiliers fur cap as compared to that of the Guards, the fur of the Fusiliers caps is shorter.

(A RRF cap of synthetic fur, I don't know the date of manufacture or if it was adopted rather than just used for trials).
Yes indeed. Not quite:
ur fusilier cap issued to him in the RWF was quite worn with bald spots back in early 1900s,

And India KD were frocks, not tunics.

The RWF were perhaps a cut above the Guards, and indeed refused the offer of becoming the Welsh Guards. Compare battle honours for example.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.