British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Infantry (& Guards) Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-11-17, 07:56 PM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default "Monarchial crown'

Greetings all. Could I ask the assembled company if the word 'monarchial' is a common technical term in this field of interest used to describe the crowns that might feature in cap badges and related military insignia?

e.g. As in the phrase "This is surmounted by a monarchial crown", etc.

(I am fairly sure it is not a typo for 'monarchical')

Thanks

JF
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-17, 12:18 AM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jf42 View Post
Greetings all. Could I ask the assembled company if the word 'monarchial' is a common technical term in this field of interest used to describe the crowns that might feature in cap badges and related military insignia?

e.g. As in the phrase "This is surmounted by a monarchial crown", etc.

(I am fairly sure it is not a typo for 'monarchical')

Thanks

JF
‘Monarchial’ is wrong in the context that you quote, but monarchical would be correct in describing a crown, although in my experience rarely used in that way as a badge collecting term.

Last edited by Toby Purcell; 07-11-17 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-17, 05:51 AM
Lancer 17 Lancer 17 is offline
Member 2010-21- Rest in Peace
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne Australia.
Posts: 1,459
Smile

G'day JF

Allowing that all crowns are Monarchical, in this field we usually refer to the various crowns as used on military badges as relating to either a King or a Queen as they are different and the crowns of Queen Victoria, who has 2 basic designs and Queen Elizabeth 11 are different. So you have abbreviations of QVC (Queen Victoria Crown), QC (QE11) and KC and just to confuse things there is also a Gulphic crown that is used on some of the older badges.

Id suggest that you use the established terminology rather than try to introduce a new term.

I hope that this helps

Regards

Phil.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-17, 08:59 AM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

Thanks gentlemen. I was aware of standard usage, which is why I was surprised to see the word used on the National Army Museum website in the description of a regimental badge.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-17, 02:42 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,207
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jf42 View Post
Thanks gentlemen. I was aware of standard usage, which is why I was surprised to see the word used on the National Army Museum website in the description of a regimental badge.
It would seem to be either a genuine spelling error, or a malapropism JF.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-17, 06:29 PM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

My impression is that 'monarchical' better refers to a model of government than to an emblem pertaining to the sovereign, such as the crowns that have already been referred to- 'QVC', 'KC'- for which I would have thought 'Royal' might be a suitable term for a non-technical, more general readership.

As I write, it occurs to me that in the majority of instances, most crowns on military insignia will be Royal, with a minority being 'Naval', 'Mural,' and perhaps other alternatives that slip my mind. Otherwise, they would be princely or ducal coronets, would they not? Off the top of my head I can't think of insignia pertaining to lower ranking nobility being employed. I stand to be corrected.

Reassured by all your contributions, I am inclined to think the description I cited is likely to be a malapropism
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-11-17, 07:52 AM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

It is merely a direct reference to the monarch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jf42 View Post
Greetings all. Could I ask the assembled company if the word 'monarchial' is a common technical term in this field of interest used to describe the crowns that might feature in cap badges and related military insignia?

e.g. As in the phrase "This is surmounted by a monarchial crown", etc.

(I am fairly sure it is not a typo for 'monarchical')

Thanks

JF
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-11-17, 08:16 AM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,115
Default

Presumably employed in this context as a shorthand rather than detail that the crown on insignia could change, being one of various patterns depending on monarch?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-11-17, 10:03 AM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

I don't think so, Leigh, as the item is dated specifically to 1902-1935. 'KC' to the initiated.


Cap badge, other ranks, Black Watch (Royal Highlanders)
,

This badge features a rayed and faceted star similar to the Star of the Order of the Thistles. Upon the centre, within a wreath of thistles, an oval frosted circle bears the burnished motto: 'nemo me impune lacesset' (meaning no one attacks me with impunity'). This is surmounted by a monarchial crown. Within the circlet the figure of St Andrew is depicted holding his cross upon a frosted ground. On either side of the crown, frosted scrolls bear the burnished unit title."

It may have been copied from another source. Sadly the site is not as authoritative as one might hope. Admittedly, the catalaogue is better, with entries having been created before recent changes.

https://collection.nam.ac.uk/detail....c=1963-12-74-1
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-11-17, 10:28 AM
rmarsden's Avatar
rmarsden rmarsden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,125
Default

JF, Badge has a brassy look about it. I wonder who fitted a slider to it?
I have only ever seen one ORs example fitted with a long pagri slider that appeared to be all original with no signs of lugs ever been fitted.
Ron.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-11-17, 10:46 AM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

Well, Ron, I guess that's a question for the National Army Museum!

What does a 'brassy look' usually signify? (Quiet in the ranks!)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-11-17, 11:22 AM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,785
Default

It's an odd badge as the type of Scottish headdress worn required lugs. The s/p was certainly lugged.

The use of the slider with Scots badges was confined to pagris and even then contemporary photos show that the Black Watch did not wear the cap badge on the FSH but wore the red hackle.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-11-17, 12:04 PM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan O View Post
It's an odd badge as the type of Scottish headdress worn required lugs. The s/p was certainly lugged.

The use of the slider with Scots badges was confined to pagris and even then contemporary photos show that the Black Watch did not wear the cap badge on the FSH but wore the red hackle.
Ah, a very fair point, re. slider, FSH and the pagri, which slipped my attention. I was distracted by Rons's comment re. the 'brassy look.'
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-11-17, 12:19 PM
rmarsden's Avatar
rmarsden rmarsden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,125
Default

JF, the badge shown in the NAM post is a J.Gaunt pattern which in 'my' index system I call die no 12.
I have three examples L to R, standard badge with J R Gaunt London tablet.
The same badge with oval area pushed forward for 3D effect (unofficially).
The same badge S/P and traces of gilt for wear in the baldric, lugs fitted horizontally. If you compare the colour of my badges to the NAM example which looks dull brownish?
Ron.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-11-17, 12:57 PM
jf42 jf42 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 235
Default

Yes, I see that clearly now, by comparison. I was wondering if it might be a trick of the light but the effect is definitely a subtle bronze- or brass. How odd.

The catalogue suggests that the Museum in the past accepted what it was given. Why that particular item should have been selected to be accessible on line, is another matter.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.