British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 18-10-14, 08:29 AM
Graham Stewart's Avatar
Graham Stewart Graham Stewart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Darlington
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
The 7th ( Isle of Man ) Volunteer Battalion, Kings Liverpool Regiment, although only of company strength were the only unit in the British Isles to remain a Volunteer unit after 1908.

The following is from The Territorial Year Book- published in 1909.

The 7th (IOM) V.B. ceased to exist in March 1920



P.B.
P.B. - Were they regarded as an autonomous unit? The reason I ask is because I hold a copies of "The Annual Return of the Territorial Force" for 1908 & 1912 and the 7th(IOM)V.B., is not listed in either Annual and yet the 1912 edition does list 'new' units formed.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 18-10-14, 08:38 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Graham,

The attached is from "The Volunteer Force Long Service Medal " by JMA Tamplin and explains the reasons for the Volunteers on the Island continuing to serve under the Act of 1863 and not becoming part of the Territorial Force.

Similar but less comprehensive explanation given by Ray Westlake in his "Collecting Metal Shoulder Titles " ( but I think he has the wrong shoulder title ).

With regard to your specific question, I only know what is mentioned in the Territorial Year Book i.e that the unit not being Territorials was under the G.O.C. Western Command, I don't know if that remained the situation from 1909 to 1920 but I will check in the books I have on IOM military history and see if I can find further information
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img003.jpg (79.1 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_3655.jpg (55.8 KB, 9 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”

Last edited by Peter Brydon; 18-10-14 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 18-10-14, 01:11 PM
Graham Stewart's Avatar
Graham Stewart Graham Stewart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Darlington
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Graham,

The attached is from "The Volunteer Force Long Service Medal " by JMA Tamplin and explains the reasons for the Volunteers on the Island continuing to serve under the Act of 1863 and not becoming part of the Territorial Force.

Similar but less comprehensive explanation given by Ray Westlake in his "Collecting Metal Shoulder Titles " ( but I think he has the wrong shoulder title ).

With regard to your specific question, I only know what is mentioned in the Territorial Year Book i.e that the unit not being Territorials was under the G.O.C. Western Command, I don't know if that remained the situation from 1909 to 1920 but I will check in the books I have on IOM military history and see if I can find further information
It's a very interesting and unusual situation concerning this unit as I also have various copies of "The Annual Return of the Volunteer Corps" & the 7th(IOM)V.B., Kings(Liverpool Regiment) are certainly listed, but their establishment and strength returns are barely that of a single Company;-
1903 - Estab 4 officers & 120 Volunteers; Actual 1 & 125
1906 - Estab 5 officers 125 Volunteers; Actual 4 & 119

It must be the only unit within the U.K. at that time with the status of a "Battalion", which barely had the strength of Company.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 18-10-14, 04:51 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,207
Default

Very interesting thread. I did not know about this unusual unit either.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 19-10-14, 01:37 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

No, not part of the TF at all. This as due to the status of the I of M.

There is an interesting 'problem' with their badges. All the HPs and Glengarry badges are titled to IoM Vols, it was only the new cap badges (OSD and WM for ORs) that are explicitly titled 7TH VB (IOM) THE KINGS L’POOL REGT The very similar (so similar that it must be made by the same maker) badge entitled ISLE OF MAN VOLUNTEERS only appeared, I believe, in 1914.

I do not know if the 7th VB cap badge was produced just after the appearance of the KC in 1902 or in 1908 when the unique status of the unit was defined.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 7VB.jpg (44.9 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_4027.JPG (55.6 KB, 19 views)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 20-10-14, 08:18 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default Isle of Man Company, 5th Bn.Loyal North Lancs Regt. T.A.

Perhaps time to ask again about a query I have had for some time, I have asked on the Forum before but without success.

The front cover of "Soldier" magazine of October 1965 had a picture of the opening of Tynwald by Princess Margaret. The key to the photo mentions a Guard of Honour which included " Territorials of the Isle of Man Company,5th Battalion,The Loyal Regiment "

I have never been able to find if this company existed or if it was a mistake by the Soldiers reporter.

Does anyone have any information please.

P.B.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3694.jpg (74.6 KB, 11 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 20-10-14, 10:20 AM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Hi Peter,
Other than the KLR, the only other Lancashire Regt I think has a connection to the IoM is the South Lancs who had a CCF unit affiliated to them from King Williams College,Castletown. see image.
The 5th Bn Loyals at the time of the Soldier article where based in Derby Bks,Bolton. I have a couple of copies of the Loyals Journal 'The Lancashire Lad' and can find no ref to a IoM connection to them.
I know from my time in the Army that Regimental Bands would often be away on tours and other duties which may have been the case for the Loyals Band being in the IoM.
Paul

Last edited by Paul Spellman; 29-01-15 at 04:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 20-10-14, 10:41 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Thanks Paul,

That is most interesting, if you could E mail me a copy of that to add to my notes on Cadets, I would be most grateful. I have wondered why the Collegiate transferred its affiliation from the South Lancs to the Liverpool Scottish but I suppose the school was just across the road from the Liverpool Scottish Drill Hall in Fraser Street.

I think we all know that you cannot believe everything you see in print but what is written in the Soldier Magazine about the 5th Loyals seems so certain.

Trying to find information on some aspects of the military in the Isle of Man seems to be difficult especially post WW2.

I am beginning to wonder if the 5th Loyals were at camp on the Isle of Man at the time of the opening of Tynwald ceremony and that is how the confusion came about.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”

Last edited by Peter Brydon; 20-10-14 at 11:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 20-10-14, 11:50 AM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Well Blow me down
Look what I found
There was an Isle of Man Company of the 5th Bn Loyal Regt 1961-67.
I found a later copy of the journal and it was in there.
Paul

Last edited by Paul Spellman; 29-01-15 at 04:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 20-10-14, 12:35 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Paul,

That is fantastic, it has solved a mystery I had been tying to answer for years, next question- did the IOM company have any insignia specific to them.

Thanks again.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 20-10-14, 01:18 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

Brilliant. Paul please could you let me know the name of the journal, which year, volume / issue no and page no.
thanks

Incidentally, Peter's clip from the medal book (again details please sometime), mentions IoM Vols up to 1914 but 7VB thereafter. I would have thought 1908 rather than 1914 but the mystery continues !
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 20-10-14, 09:08 PM
Graham Stewart's Avatar
Graham Stewart Graham Stewart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Darlington
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLR View Post
Incidentally, Peter's clip from the medal book (again details please sometime), mentions IoM Vols up to 1914 but 7VB thereafter. I would have thought 1908 rather than 1914 but the mystery continues !
001.jpg
Taken from the October 1914 Army List.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 21-10-14, 07:34 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Graham,

But then this is the heading to the Kings Liverpool Regiment entry in the September 1915 Army List.

Peter
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_3700.jpg (70.7 KB, 17 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 21-10-14, 08:24 PM
Graham Stewart's Avatar
Graham Stewart Graham Stewart is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Darlington
Posts: 1,001
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Graham,

But then this is the heading to the Kings Liverpool Regiment entry in the September 1915 Army List.

Peter
Same heading as in the October 1914 & my April 1915 Army Lists and listed in column 981a as the 7th(IOM)V.B., Kings, with McKenzie still at its head, but now a Major.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 22-10-14, 06:59 AM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

It looks as though they were as confused as we are !
I'll go through ALs 1881 - 1920 when I'm next in a library.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.