British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Canadian Military Insignia > Infantry

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-02-12, 08:53 PM
Roberto T Roberto T is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22
Default

Bill,

As WJ Miller mentioned it is from faces of war. If you haven't checked out the database, it is great. A little limited in content but very easily searchable with some awesome pics. So is it clear that there was lance corporals in rifle regiments?

Albert, thanks for the info. When I posted the pic I was unaware of the meaning of the monument. What is the story surrounding your family member during the war?

cheers,

Roberto
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-02-12, 09:27 PM
appie_b's Avatar
appie_b appie_b is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ede, the Netherlands
Posts: 432
Default

Hi Roberto,

I have added a few pictures of the monument, the first one is taken during the construction of the monument, you can see the Plaque which is also in your picture plus a close up of the plaque (picture 3).
Picture 2 is a picture of the monument as it is today.

My family member was callad Hendrik Brouwer, he was a member of the local KP (knop ploeg = armed arm of the resistance, they used to carry out sabotage ,attacks and robberies in order to get food stamps etc.
He was arrested early in 1944 and was taken to Arnhem prison. Later he was moved to the concentration camp in Vucht, where he was executed on the 4th of September 1944.

Albert.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mausoleum1.jpg (24.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg mausoleum2.jpg (72.6 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg mausoleum3.jpg (81.1 KB, 10 views)
__________________
when we forget the past we are doomed to repeat it
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-02-12, 10:11 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

Sorry Roberto, My post was poorly worded. To clarify I meant to say that the sources should be credited. Prevents issues re copyright etc.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 13-02-12, 04:15 PM
Tanker Mike's Avatar
Tanker Mike Tanker Mike is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,116
Default

As usual Ed has to cause controversy by voicing his opinion on “go buy a book” he mentions that Geoff is “playing the fourm” which is incorrect. Geoff is simply asking the right questions and wants feedback on this item, which I think is why we have fourms like this, not to point fingers and accuse others.
It seems as soon as someone has a question about anything Ed thinks it’s a conspiracy or a dealer trying to solicit information to bump up a price, which is contradicting himself as he is an author of military collectables himself. The next time he states “go buy a book” insert the phrase “I want more money”. Frankly I was sick and tired of him and Michael Dorosh on the CSC fourm always playing this card, too bad they have Infiltrated this fourm.

Last edited by Bill A; 13-02-12 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 13-02-12, 04:42 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

Just a reminder to all that the Forum is for the discussion of badges an insignia. Please focus the discussion on the material, and not the people.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur

Last edited by Bill A; 13-02-12 at 09:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 13-02-12, 07:06 PM
Roberto T Roberto T is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22
Default Final Conclusions

I would love to get the final conclusions on this BD. So far it is fairly split on whether this was a put together BD with original parts or a wartime BD.
So far I can tell you that:
- No insignia have been on this BD before
- The regimental titles are wartime made, canadian and hand sewn with red thread. All negative to UV and the thread passes burn test.
- The div patch is a nice canvas patch showing good age and is hand sewn but is slightly off center
- The rank chevrons are also hand sewn red thread. They are placed higher than regulation
- It is clear that the same person placed the badges on the tunic from the stitching style
- My thoughts regarding placement is that it frankly does not fit to outside of the norm. I have seen another RR BD with chevron way to low... and a significant amount of badges are not on BDs exactly at regulation.
I have attached all photos I have.

I would love peoples final conclusions and their thought process!

Bill,

My apologies, I will credit my photos from now on.

Albert,

Thanks for the info. I have sent you a PM.

Roberto
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_5412.jpg (38.2 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_5413.jpg (58.7 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_5415.jpg (50.2 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_5414.jpg (98.3 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_5416.jpg (41.3 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0352.jpg (38.1 KB, 17 views)

Last edited by Roberto T; 13-02-12 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 13-02-12, 07:42 PM
Michael Dorosh Michael Dorosh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanker Mike View Post
The spacing of the flashes is what concerns me, the spacing has to be uniform according to regulations, especially to rifle regiments. And the tunic is for a cpl, he is a junior NCO and has to show leadership to the junior ranks, you would think the stripes would be sewn on to the regulations.
I don't think this post reflects what constitutes basic understanding of reality in the military. There are far too many photos of soldiers in the Canadian Army in the Second World War wearing uniforms that wildly diverged from 'book' practice to make anyone believe that regulations were rigidly adhered to 100% of the time. It obviously depended on the time of the war, circumstance, unit, or even sub-unit. The "coming home" BD was probably more rigidly enforced, but dismissing a battledress as authentic based on the fact it didn't match up 100 percent to what some Army regulation said it was supposed to look like is, putting it mildly, a mistake. The briefest of glances of the coming home parade of the Calgary Highlanders would convince one of that.

If one looks at the book Muskets to Missiles, IIRC, there is a fine LAC photo of a Hasty P coming back to Canada at the end of the war with his 8th Army flash proudly sewn to his epaulette. Plenty of other photos scattered through various books of crooked rank badges, divisional flashes too high or low, CANADA badges missing, etc. This was after the war during the period of 'smartening up'.

You would think the rank badges would be sewn on according to the regulations, and I'm sure the RSMs would have loved for it to be that way, but the truth is, they often weren't.

One could write a book about how poorly the headdress was worn, but that's another topic.

There is no way I would ever invalidate an item's authenticity based on its adherence to regulations, and I have to believe experienced collectors would discount any advice to do the same.
__________________
canadiansoldiers.com

Last edited by Michael Dorosh; 13-02-12 at 07:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 13-02-12, 09:39 PM
Tanker Mike's Avatar
Tanker Mike Tanker Mike is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,116
Default Another high striped tunic

High and tight, like the Marines...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg WLI.jpg (55.6 KB, 37 views)
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 13-02-12, 10:28 PM
Michael Dorosh Michael Dorosh is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanker Mike View Post
High and tight, like the Marines...
Exactly; an excellent photo that demonstrates the point about badges not always being in "regulation" position. Although based on the photo alone, there is no way to know who actually sewed the badges on - they could have been placed there by a (civilian) collector long after the war.
__________________
canadiansoldiers.com
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 13-02-12, 11:17 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

Not sure what is meant by "regulation" in these posts? The "official" spacing for the shoulder titles, nationality titles and formation patches changed over the course of the war, so we need to know what time period is in question. Early on, the patches were higher on the sleeve, and then moved down.
The tunic looks like a summer khaki drill tunic?
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 13-02-12, 11:31 PM
Roberto T Roberto T is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22
Default

Wow that really is high and tight..... Bill and Tanker Mike, taking everything into consideration your final thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 14-02-12, 01:06 PM
jim a jim a is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,755
Default

Roberto.... Your indecision is quite something to watch. You know that all the parts are correct, that the tunic itself is dated 0.k. , that the thread is right.... but you are asking tanker Mike and Bill to provide you assurance that this came from a veteran and is not made up. That's impossible.....they can't tell you that... they have told you the parts are correct..... Now I happen to know Geoff personally and I have also seen his collection first hand. He spends alot of time beating the bushes for good legit items . He is a specialist in Saskatchewan items and has tunics to all the Sask Regiments in his personal collection. .... He would drive 200 miles north of Prince Albert to purchase a tunic like this one.... I know he would NEVER make one up as it is not in his character... he has integrity.

Now he has picked this tunic and with all his expertise gained from 30 years of collecting he thinks it's good.You have bought it. If you aren't happy with it send it back. It's as simple as that... the fact you can return it with no hassles is another indicator that it is good as Geoff stands by what he sells.

But realize this... if you are collecting tunics what you have right now is as good as it gets for most of the situations you can buy into.

The only other way is to only buy tunics directly from the veteran himself or from the vet's family.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 14-02-12, 01:48 PM
Roberto T Roberto T is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 22
Default

Jim,

I realize everything you said. Post war sewn tunics do not have the same historical significance, value or desired place in my collection. To me, this is not a BD that was clearly put together.. ....As a learning point, however, I would like to know why certain others concluded this was post war sewn.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 14-02-12, 02:14 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

Hi Roberto, As has been indicated, the only one that has to be satisfied with this uniform is you. I think you have all the evidence that is needed for an evaluation. There is certainly lots to chew over in the thread. But in the end you are the one purchasing the lot, and as Jim says, we can't make that an iron clad decision for you.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 14-02-12, 02:32 PM
Voltigeur's Avatar
Voltigeur Voltigeur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal,Canada.
Posts: 5,778
Default

As Michael Dorosh wrote:
There are far too many photos of soldiers in the Canadian Army in the Second World War wearing uniforms that wildly diverged from 'book' practice to make anyone believe that regulations were rigidly adhered to 100% of the time.

Just check this photo of an A&SHofC.
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/d...oviqqavs023t31

Just my two cents to this debate.
Jo
__________________
"There truly exists but one perfect order: that of cemeteries. The dead never complain and they enjoy their equality in silence." -

“There are things we know that we know,” “There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know.”
Donald Rumsfeld, before the Iraqi Invasion,2003.

Age is something that doesn't matter, unless you are a cheese.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.