 |
Recent Books by Forum Members |
 |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
20-01-16, 03:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Dominique, Yes this is a controversial wing. It is reported to represent Wireless Operator Ground, which begs the question as to why it is a wing. RCAF Mike, Wingnut, or SAS1 (or another expert in wings) will have more.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur 
|
|
#3
20-01-16, 03:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
....always thought it was Wireless Operator (Air)Gunner....
Jo
__________________
"There truly exists but one perfect order: that of cemeteries. The dead never complain and they enjoy their equality in silence." - “There are things we know that we know,” “There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know.” Donald Rumsfeld, before the Iraqi Invasion,2003. Age is something that doesn't matter, unless you are a cheese.
|
|
#4
20-01-16, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting response on the WAG question here from Alex
http://www.network54.com/Forum/18074...lf+wing+emblem If unofficial, as stated, perhaps WOG and WAG were to those wearing them, the same and it was just down to personal choice/interpretation as they were unsanctioned ? T
|
|
#6
20-01-16, 08:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
An old collector friend of mine had told me these appeared in the 70's. They all have the same minor flaw in the feathers. I never seen any pics of them being worn. They look original and maybe they were made as prototype? Anyone's guess as to real storey behind them.
|
|
|
|
 |
Hybrid Mode
