British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-09-08, 02:27 PM
brodie brodie is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
Default Desert uniform identification please

Can anyone identify a regiment for me from this photo - specifically the epaulettes. I reckon I can make out 43 and something which looks like a palm tree!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 11.jpg (36.6 KB, 157 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-09-08, 02:32 PM
wright241's Avatar
wright241 wright241 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: In Luxembourg for the last 20 years and staying. They take much better care of us here....
Posts: 2,995
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brodie View Post
Can anyone identify a regiment for me from this photo - specifically the epaulettes. I reckon I can make out 43 and something which looks like a palm tree!

Any chance of a larger and better picture, or is the original very small?
You can see more than I can on my screen..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-09-08, 02:48 PM
brodie brodie is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
Default

The original is postcard sized and this is a copy of a scan. I've cropped it to just the man and adjusted it to greyscale - hopefully easier to see.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 11a.jpg (38.5 KB, 126 views)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-09-08, 03:35 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Combination Div Sign ? 78th Div and ??
P.B.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF8723.jpg (36.2 KB, 82 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-09-08, 03:48 PM
fougasse1940's Avatar
fougasse1940 fougasse1940 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by brodie View Post
Can anyone identify a regiment for me from this photo - specifically the epaulettes. I reckon I can make out 43 and something which looks like a palm tree!
The palm tree looks like the Crusader's battle axe of the 78th Division.
There was a 49th LAA Regt. in the 79th Div.

Rgds,
fougasse1940.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-09-08, 05:49 PM
brodie brodie is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 9
Default

Thanks Fougasse - I've checked out a picture of the 78th insignia and I am sure you are right. Looks like this lad was 49th LAA.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-09-08, 06:12 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

So I was miles away,but I dont think that Fougasse is necessarily correct because I dont think units showed their designations so obviously on the epaulette slides, but I may be wrong.

One of the slides I illustrated from British Battle Insignia 2 1939-45 by Mike Chappell showed the number "49" below the 78th Div sign,but according to the text this was for 214th Field Company R.E. and appears to be the units tactical sign rather than the regiments number.

Look forward to hearing what the cloth experts think.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-09-08, 07:30 PM
rubicon's Avatar
rubicon rubicon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Gold Beach Normandy
Posts: 235
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8thfoot View Post
So I was miles away,but I dont think that Fougasse is necessarily correct because I dont think units showed their designations so obviously on the epaulette slides, but I may be wrong.

One of the slides I illustrated from British Battle Insignia 2 1939-45 by Mike Chappell showed the number "49" below the 78th Div sign,but according to the text this was for 214th Field Company R.E. and appears to be the units tactical sign rather than the regiments number.

Look forward to hearing what the cloth experts think.

P.B.
Hello,
I agree with 8thfoot, "49" is one of the tactical signs used for identification on the Infantry Div.'s vehicules, this one 49 on blue was used by a Royal Engineers Field Company. Tactical codes were used by Royal Engineers units on BD as identification badges in some divisions such 78th ID, 3rd ID, 49th ID... The man on the postcard is probably a fellow enlisted in the 214th Field Company R.E., 78th Infantry Division. Cheers J-F
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RE 50.JPG (26.0 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 246fieldcoyRE.jpg (44.0 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-09-08, 08:43 AM
fougasse1940's Avatar
fougasse1940 fougasse1940 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon View Post
Hello,
I agree with 8thfoot, "49" is one of the tactical signs used for identification on the Infantry Div.'s vehicules, this one 49 on blue was used by a Royal Engineers Field Company. Tactical codes were used by Royal Engineers units on BD as identification badges in some divisions such 78th ID, 3rd ID, 49th ID... The man on the postcard is probably a fellow enlisted in the 214th Field Company R.E., 78th Infantry Division. Cheers J-F
8thfoot and rubicon I stand corrected, of course it's the tactical sign, not the unit's number.
I just had a quick leaf through Joslen and found the 49th LAA. My only contribution therefore is taking it from 43 in the first post to 49.
214th Field Company R.E. it is.

Rgds,
fougasse1940.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13-10-08, 11:17 PM
Woodbine Woodbine is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Default

Does anyone know if there is a published list of these tactical codes?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-08-10, 10:37 AM
Ron Goldstein's Avatar
Ron Goldstein Ron Goldstein is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2
Default

Hi

May I as a "newbie" throw in my comment ?

I was a 49 LAA Man myself, in 78 Div and can definitely confirm that the 49 number shown above had nothing at all to do with the actual regiment.

I was to go on later to become a "tankie" and demonstrate this on my Avatar on http://www.ww2talk.com/

Regards

Ron
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Amended Avatar.jpg (3.3 KB, 21 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 14-08-10, 02:23 PM
Postwarden's Avatar
Postwarden Postwarden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 3,232
Default Military Markings

As far as I know the best published list is in the 1971 Almark-published book British Military Markings 1939-1946.

It has a pretty comprehensive listing by types of formation for various dates.

Copies listed on ABE Books

Postwarden
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.