British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Formation Signs and Patches

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-02-20, 06:54 PM
fearnaught fearnaught is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hove, actually
Posts: 1,807
Default H.Q. flashes?

Hi, Jon Mills in his excellent book " Badges on Battledress" says early in the war some Div. and Bde. H.Q.s had swallow tailed signs but in red and blue. I wonder if this sign could be a detached tank unit attached to an H.Q. of some sort? If not, then what could it be? Open to any suggestions, thanks in advance Mike
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC05533.jpg (46.6 KB, 67 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-02-20, 05:54 AM
fairlie63's Avatar
fairlie63 fairlie63 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Claremont, Tasmania
Posts: 1,368
Default

Mike, it may be that this patch is related to 1st New Zealand Army Tank Brigade, possibly NZ Army Service Corps.

Cliff Lord (Quicksilver on this forum) and Malcolm Thomas show similar patches in their New Zealand Army Distinguishing Patches 1911-1991, Part One, pp. 65-66.

The system of patches for this brigade was 1 inch square. They do not show this one but style of material and size seem a match for the examples they do show.

Cheers, Keith
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-02-20, 08:06 AM
fearnaught fearnaught is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hove, actually
Posts: 1,807
Default

Hi Keith, thank you for that information, sounds interesting, best wishes Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-20, 05:48 AM
Quicksilver Quicksilver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feilding NZ
Posts: 606
Default

I do not know the answer to this question, but have asked my co-author on the New Zealand Army Distinguishing Patches part one book, Malcolm Thomas, what he thinks about it. His reply follows:
Although very very similar to the WWII 1 NZ Army Tank Brigades ASC Company, I can find no reason why it should have a pennant shaped background. The Tank brigade did not evolve from any of the NZ Mounted Rifles units which (when horsed) did use lances with pennants. Nor have I seen any other New Zealand Army patches sewn on to a wooden background like this. Otherwise it could be a sweetheart badge doctored to look fancy?
Unless other info comes to light then I would say it is not a New Zealand Army insignia.
(My gut feeling is that it is genuine but a sweetheart patch)
Malcolm collects NZ patches and badges and has a superb collection. I do not collect them, but I did manage to pick up one of these tank patches for the 1st New Zealand Army Tank Brigade Signal Squadron with a tank superimposed about four years ago. It was genuine. I mention this because on page 65 of part 1 I state that the Signal Squadron only had a white over blue 1 inch patch. That was true at first, but later the tank was sew on. All my photos were without tank and taken in NZ before moving to the Islands in the Pacific.
Quicksilver (Cliff Lord)




Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlie63 View Post
Mike, it may be that this patch is related to 1st New Zealand Army Tank Brigade, possibly NZ Army Service Corps.

Cliff Lord (Quicksilver on this forum) and Malcolm Thomas show similar patches in their New Zealand Army Distinguishing Patches 1911-1991, Part One, pp. 65-66.

The system of patches for this brigade was 1 inch square. They do not show this one but style of material and size seem a match for the examples they do show.

Cheers, Keith
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-02-20, 09:16 PM
fearnaught fearnaught is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hove, actually
Posts: 1,807
Default

Hi Cliff, I read your article on 1st N.Z. Tank Bde. and initially thought that was the answer but I also have a very similar small tank on a British WW2 uniform. Not denigrating N.Z. embroidering skills but from the pictures in your article they are not of the greatest quality so perhaps as they only appeared after they left New Zealand they were made by the soldiers themselves. This, for me, is unfortunate as it would be good to have an answer as to what the sign is.
A long time ago I was told these small tanks were for detached units of the R.T.R. and I hope that is what this sign is. Alas, hope is one thing and proof is something else, so thank you for your response and if you can identify it as being N.Z. I would be more than happy, but at the moment I'm still in favour of it being British, best wishes Mike

Last edited by fearnaught; 27-02-20 at 08:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-02-20, 08:27 AM
Quicksilver Quicksilver is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Feilding NZ
Posts: 606
Default

Hi Mike,
There is one last thing I can tell you about the Tank Bde patches and that is I was told by the man who gave me the signals tank patch was that his father told him that they had a sewing machine in one of the Brigade tents in New Zealand and sewed on the tank. I look forward to hearing back from you when you have a positive ID.
BRgds
Cliff

Quote:
Originally Posted by fearnaught View Post
Hi Cliff, I read your article on 1st N.Z. Tank Bde. and initially thought that was the answer but I also have a very similar small tank on a British WW2 uniform. Not denigrating N.Z. embroidering skills but from the pictures in your article they are not of the greatest quality so perhaps as they only appeared after they left New Zealand they were made by the soldiers themselves. This, for me, is unfortunate as it would be good to have an answer as to what the sign is.
A long time ago I was told these small tanks were for detached units of the R.T.R. and I hope that is what this sign is. Alas, hope is one thing and proof is something else, so thank you for your response and if you can identify it as being N.Z. I would be more than happy, but at the moment I still in favour of it being British, best wishes Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.