|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Alan,
The J.B. Peters articles are known for errors some of which have unfortunately been repeated in later books. I did wonder if the badge that JBP notes as having been seen but not worn was in fact another example of Robs badge which started the thread ? P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )” |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
I would suspect that was the case.
Alan |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
HLI/Black Watch
Thanks to all who have contributed to this thread, I can see what Alan means about a struggle to get Royal Highland regiment on the lower scrolls even with abreviating Regiment it would be a designers nightmare.
Interesting that both units objected to the idea, I wonder why? Rob |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
This was the blunt star badge which is attributed to the 2nd Bn rasied circa 1938. The badge was supposedly made in Glasgow to meet the sudden demand for new badges when a duplicate battalion was raised.
Last edited by Alan O; 15-09-12 at 06:01 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Good work, Alan, an interesting badge. What are the dimensions?
I purchased a similar badge, along with other mint Scottish badges, from a Glasgow men's outfitters in 1963. Cheers, Tinto PS Have just looked through my bits and pieces to find the envelope of W.L.Thomson & Son Ltd., 25 Union Street, Glasgow. Last edited by Tinto; 24-08-12 at 09:12 PM. Reason: Added information |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Rgds, Thomas. Last edited by fougasse1940; 24-08-12 at 10:32 PM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Tinto
The dims on my blunt Glagow Highlanders badge are 71mm North/South and 55mm East/West measured from star end to star end. Here are mine: 9th Btn Officers 9th Btn Lacesset spelling 9th Btn Lacessit spelling Glasgow Highlander Q/C Glasgow highlanders (suspect) Glasgow Highlanders blunt Dubaiguy |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks, Dubaiguy.
An attractive lot you have shown. I don't have the QC variant. Cheers, Tinto |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Some nice examples shown, here are the ones i have.
5th Btn Glasgow Highlanders QVC 9th Btn Lacesset spelling 9th Btn Lacessit spelling (Large Version) Glasgow Highlanders blunt Glasgow highlanders (I have 2) Malc
__________________
http://www.watlingmilitaria.com/ Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The badge was not worn by the Black Watch and according to the RHF museum and their records was not worn by the Glasgow Highlanders.
The theory is that someone got hold of an old die and messed about with it. This story, re the theory, came round in the 1970s. TM Last edited by forty twa; 22-03-16 at 01:57 PM. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
This badge was not worn by the Black Watch or the Glasgow Highlanders. The consensus from both regiments is that someone got hold of an old die and re-cut it - 'just to confuse collectors'.
Some clearly have been struck too heavily and have pierced the badges around the scrolls - these look hellish. Others which are only slightly better looking are scarce but worth having in your collection as curios only. TM |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
The '2nd bn blunt die' die has no similarities with any other so its not a case of re-cutting an old die to create the wide star arms, but a totally new die with a different design of sphinx, scrolls, arms the whole lot.
So I presume that forty twa means the GH badge with the altered Black Watch title? It's mentioned in Gaylor's book of which the 1st edition which was published in 1971. If that's the case then it's a very early fake. Does anyone have the 1st edn to hand? Last edited by Alan O; 24-02-16 at 06:47 PM. Reason: clarification |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
Attached is what Gaylor said.
P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )” |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I have had two of these badges in the past 30 years, both quite well made and old-looking. I always regarded them as a manufacturer's mistake and never thought of them as a deliberate falsification. All I know is that they are neither BW or HLI!
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
If as Peter's article above shows, they were about in 1968 then that would suggest a makers' error and never worn.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|