British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > General Topics.

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14-07-20, 04:59 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,706
Default Silver hallmark help

Can the sharp eyed help out with this hallmark. It's for sale as 1866. I have my doubts about this . I think it's far later and that would fit with my take on the badge it's on.
Any help appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20200714_175415.jpg (44.2 KB, 79 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-07-20, 05:18 PM
mike_vee's Avatar
mike_vee mike_vee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 4,934
Default

Not 1866 - "A further mark was used in the period 1784 - 1890:
Sovereign head ('duty mark'), certifying the payment of the duty"

Anchor - Lion - H is Birmingham 1932

Anchor - Lion - R is Birmingham 1941

Letter K was used in 1934 but 'duty mark' was also used on 1934 & 1935 items.

http://www.silvercollection.it/engli...lmarksBIR.html
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative.

Poppy and British Legion Wanted
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-07-20, 05:19 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

The date mark looks like anchor (B'ham) - lion (sterling) - F = 1930 to me
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-07-20, 05:40 PM
grenadierguardsman's Avatar
grenadierguardsman grenadierguardsman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLR View Post
The date mark looks like anchor (B'ham) - lion (sterling) - F = 1930 to me
I agree F in my opinion.
Andy
__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-07-20, 05:48 PM
mike_vee's Avatar
mike_vee mike_vee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 4,934
Default

Could be a badly stamped F ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hallmark.jpg (27.2 KB, 34 views)
__________________
British Legion/Royal British Legion , Poppy/Remembrance/Commemorative.

Poppy and British Legion Wanted
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-07-20, 06:12 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,706
Default

I thought that it could be an F. My thought was that it was 1930 if an F or 1941 if it's an R.
As mentioned previously there is no sovereigns head. Which was why I doubted it was Victorian.
The badge is a KRRC belt plate made by Gaunts. It has just the bare minimum of battle honours on it which as far as I was aware was used post 1905
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-07-20, 06:37 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,706
Default

I have another one for you lot. Is the C a.capital or lower case ? 1902 or 1927.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20200714_193553.jpg (106.9 KB, 35 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14-07-20, 07:25 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

There are very two similar marks - 1902 or 1927.
I think it is the latter - the top of the c mark is much more likely to be 1927

Last edited by KLR; 14-07-20 at 07:29 PM. Reason: typo
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14-07-20, 07:38 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLR View Post
There are very two similar marks - 1902 or 1927.
I think it is the latter - the top of the c mark is much more likely to be 1927
Thanks Julian ,I wasnt sure. They do look very very similar. The WW1 battle honours are there so it must be 1927.

Last edited by Mike H; 15-07-20 at 06:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-07-20, 05:45 PM
Mike H's Avatar
Mike H Mike H is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike H View Post
Can the sharp eyed help out with this hallmark. It's for sale as 1866. I have my doubts about this . I think it's far later and that would fit with my take on the badge it's on.
Any help appreciated.
I've taken on board everything that's been said regarding the HM. But I now have another problem.
The Cross doesnt have the " Busaco" battle honour on the cross . Which would make it an early version of the Cross.
Busaco appears from1905 on the new version of the 60th rifles version of the cross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.