British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Infantry (& Guards) Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31-07-12, 04:40 PM
Sonofacqms's Avatar
Sonofacqms Sonofacqms is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,821
Default Glasgow Highlanders-Black Watch

I bought this badge with a lot of others that all had loops and sliders missing, I repaired it and it now resides between the 9th HLI and the Black Watch.

Does anyone else have a badge like this?

Awaiting members thoughts on this badge.

Rob
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1000051.jpg (85.3 KB, 373 views)
File Type: jpg P1000052.jpg (93.0 KB, 211 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-07-12, 06:06 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,646
Default

Rob, looks like the TF badge to me and if genuine worth about £100!

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-07-12, 06:08 PM
LONGSHANKS's Avatar
LONGSHANKS LONGSHANKS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: GREAT BRITAIN
Posts: 3,743
Default

Why so Andy? The lack of plinth.

Simon.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-07-12, 06:21 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGSHANKS View Post
Why so Andy? The lack of plinth.

Simon.
No mate, if you look it has a plinth! It's the long, crossed thistle leaves above the BW scrolls!

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-07-12, 06:28 PM
Tinto's Avatar
Tinto Tinto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gisborne, New Zealand
Posts: 3,083
Default

Hi All,
A very interesting badge. My understanding is that the Glasgow Highlanders were of the Highland Light Infantry. Where does the Black Watch come into it, apart from the similar badge design?
Cheers, Tinto
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-07-12, 06:34 PM
LONGSHANKS's Avatar
LONGSHANKS LONGSHANKS is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: GREAT BRITAIN
Posts: 3,743
Default

Thanks Andy, that would have been another on the watch list.... but I think the plot has thickened since then......

Simon.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-07-12, 06:24 PM
Sonofacqms's Avatar
Sonofacqms Sonofacqms is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,821
Default TF HLI

Andy, I must apologise for the picture, I am not the best photographer in the world and I am new to this digital camera.

The top scrolls read "Glasgow Highlanders" and the lower scrolls read "Black Watch", here hangs the query, this badge is not shown or mentioned as far as I am aware in any of the books and is totally wrong, however when I got it years ago a certain very well known collector was very interested in it, he obviously knew more than I did about this badge which is why I am offering it up for an answer as to why it was made like this.

Rob
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-02-16, 03:32 PM
forty twa forty twa is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10
Default

This badge was not worn by the Black Watch or the Glasgow Highlanders. The consensus from both regiments is that someone got hold of an old die and re-cut it - 'just to confuse collectors'.
Some clearly have been struck too heavily and have pierced the badges around the scrolls - these look hellish. Others which are only slightly better looking are scarce but worth having in your collection as curios only.

TM
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-02-16, 05:12 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,795
Default

The '2nd bn blunt die' die has no similarities with any other so its not a case of re-cutting an old die to create the wide star arms, but a totally new die with a different design of sphinx, scrolls, arms the whole lot.

So I presume that forty twa means the GH badge with the altered Black Watch title?

It's mentioned in Gaylor's book of which the 1st edition which was published in 1971. If that's the case then it's a very early fake.

Does anyone have the 1st edn to hand?

Last edited by Alan O; 24-02-16 at 06:47 PM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-02-16, 05:41 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,373
Default

Attached is what Gaylor said.

P.B.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2225.jpg (89.0 KB, 74 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 24-02-16, 07:39 AM
kingsley kingsley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,022
Default

I have had two of these badges in the past 30 years, both quite well made and old-looking. I always regarded them as a manufacturer's mistake and never thought of them as a deliberate falsification. All I know is that they are neither BW or HLI!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 24-02-16, 06:25 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,795
Default

If as Peter's article above shows, they were about in 1968 then that would suggest a makers' error and never worn.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.