|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Rifle Volunteers Button
Hi,
Could someone tell me if this is a Rifle Volunteers button. Thanks Paul Last edited by Paul Spellman; 29-01-15 at 04:46 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
RV Button?
Rear of button
Last edited by Paul Spellman; 29-01-15 at 04:46 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
To be RVC it would be WM or blackened.
It appears a generic Rifle Regiment button of the regular Victorian Army. regards
__________________
Simon Butterworth Manchester Regiment Collector Rank, Prize & Trade Badges British & Commonwealth Artillery Badges |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Paul,
I agree with Simon. I have a similar silver plated button which I think is probably a Rifle Volunteer item. Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )” |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Hello
A lot of Rifle Volunteer buttons were "black metal" which usually means they were blackened brass, so this one could be a generic Rifle Volunteer button if it is brass and someone has polished off the black finish thinking it was tarnish! I have seen a few blackened brass Rifle Volunteer buttons to specific units that have been dealt with (ie spoilt!) this way! I think the somewhat unusual backmark would make it quite an early RVC button if it is. Regards Roger |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks All,
I thought it may have been blackened at some point but there does not seem to be enough evidence of that. The Makers Mark ? (Coat of Arms) had me wondering if it was Issue rather than purchase by RV's. Paul |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Hello Paul
I may be wrong but I don't think there is any significance to this backmark insofar as it relates to government issue or private purchase. I have a few British military buttons with this mark and they tend to date from the 1850s/1860s period. That said there are no hard and fast rules regarding dating buttons from their backmarks, just "guidelines" as they say! Regards Roger |
|
|