British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Royal Navy and Royal Marines

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25-05-16, 07:08 AM
Phill Lockett's Avatar
Phill Lockett Phill Lockett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 769
Default Royal Marines Commando Cloth Title WWII opininion

Hi all

This is a paste back and the lettering style is ///// also have checked under UV and it doesn't glow.

Is this a late war title and was it worn?

Also could this type of construction been used post war for Royal Marines Commando's?

thanks in advance

Phill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-05-16, 08:04 AM
Mike B Mike B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,584
Default

Phill
This site is very useful - it should answer a lot of questions - but also raise others!

http://www.rmhistorical.com/

See Badges section in particular

In a rush so please excuse brevity

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-05-16, 08:22 AM
Phill Lockett's Avatar
Phill Lockett Phill Lockett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 769
Default

Thanks Mike

Unfortunetley it raises more questions which only seasoned collectors would know.

The one I pictured is not there.

There is also a discussion on the use of the s "Marines" and "Marine" WWII or post WWII?

Mine doesn't fit the 1954-76 which I believe is a thicker variant.

I think my one needs the educated eye of the seasoned collector.

Sorry mate im none the wiser.

Phill
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-05-16, 09:28 AM
Mike B Mike B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,584
Default

Phill
Sorry the site did not provide the information you sought - I did mention it raises a lot of questions as well as answering others ... Nevertheless a useful starting point if even through 'deduction'.
I have heard that glue back manufacture was a wartime method - but I appreciate my head might get blown off if I put it above the parapet any further. Did this method go on for any length of time after the war? - I don't know, but have heard not for long.
In deed a RM Specialist may be able to advise.
Hopefully through raising questions on Forums we can be pointed in the right direction, and I hope this is the case with your query which raises interesting points.
And yes - I am familiar with the other points you raise re S etc as well as many other formats - all fascinating stuff that will keep us busy for years to come.
Mike

Last edited by Mike B; 25-05-16 at 01:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-05-16, 07:02 PM
Phill Lockett's Avatar
Phill Lockett Phill Lockett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 769
Default

Hi Mike

It is an interesting site and I have learnt what to look for and the dates they were issued or used.

The glue back/paste back is what I have been informed by many collectors of WWII era manufacture ,but as you know there are no absolutes in collecting patches, maybe it could of had a limited use post war?

What I find mystifying is that I have read as many threads with subject titles RM Commando Insignia (that i can locate) but no one has asked the question.

I have posted on Commando forum so I will get back if there is anything interesting to report.

Just a thought could this have been made for but never used or issued due to having the distinctive Royal Marines straight "cash" tape RM titles?

Phill
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-05-16, 08:59 PM
Mike B Mike B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,584
Default

Phill

It is certainly good that you are asking questions - similar questions have been asked by others but as far as I know many questions have not been definitively answered. Pooling knowledge through forums and correspondence obviously helps. It is disappointing that your questions have not attracted more replies as any snippets or thoughts are helpful.

You will know that in addition to the Cash Tape RM insignia there were various other multi-part/put together RM titles as well as several distinct one piece Unit titles. I can think of one pattern relating to No 44 RM COMMANDO (this format) that I have never seen in a 'worn' state.

Some of the three part titles include cut down numeral over straight generic ROYAL MARINES title with curved COMMANDO below. I imagine you have seen images or have examples

I tend to associated single piece, multi lined RM titles as later versions but 'possibly' late war - further research is required to be definitive about start and end dates in many instances.

Obviously one thing to bear in mind for dative evidence is the insignia sometimes worn in conjunction with shoulder designations - particularly the fact that the 'Combined Operations' badge was replaced after a request for distinct 'Commando Group' insignia had been made in November 1944. Again you are probably aware of this.

Several variations of Shoulder Designation (including 'put together' three piece examples) are illustrated in Special Publication 41 of the Royal Marines Historical Society celebrating the 350th Anniversary of the Corps in 2014 - headed 'Personal Distinctions: 350 Years of Royal Marines Uniform and Insignia' by John Rawlinson. Several members of this forum contributed items/images for illustration. John also had access to the Museum and Archive. I believe the book is available through the RM Museum, Southsea for £35. It covers all aspects of RM distinctions and insignia, over 350 years, in 316 pages.

Archive documentation of the titles is not strong, particularly theatre made variants.

If you are referring the Commando Veterans Association site their Photograph Archive is excellent and the Forum useful, again several members of CVA are on this forum too so hopefully it should produce something - please keep us informed.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-05-16, 04:27 PM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
Phill
This site is very useful - it should answer a lot of questions - but also raise others!

http://www.rmhistorical.com/

See Badges section in particular

In a rush so please excuse brevity

Mike
I was very disappointed to note that the Royals are claiming to have designed the "Unofficial SBS badge designed in 1948/49 by Mne Tom Boardman"

http://www.rmhistorical.com/images/Misc.pdf

It was actually the metal/enamel beret badge of 2 SBS (an Army unit) and was designed (c 26 Nov 42) by a member of that very small unit and worn on the green beret from 1942. The date, design and colours are evidenced by the image below - from a manufacturer's design/order book owned by a friend. Mike

2 SBS 26 Nov 42 from unident pattern book.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-05-16, 06:02 PM
54Bty's Avatar
54Bty 54Bty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 6,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jackson View Post
I was very disappointed to note that the Royals are claiming to have designed the "Unofficial SBS badge designed in 1948/49 by Mne Tom Boardman"

http://www.rmhistorical.com/images/Misc.pdf

It was actually the metal/enamel beret badge of 2 SBS (an Army unit) and was designed (c 26 Nov 42) by a member of that very small unit and worn on the green beret from 1942. The date, design and colours are evidenced by the image below - from a manufacturer's design/order book owned by a friend. Mike

Attachment 149808
When I first saw this badge many years ago I thought it was for the Special Service Brigade.

Marc
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-05-16, 06:33 PM
Mike B Mike B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,584
Default

Mike - EXCEPTIONAL!
The story goes that when the badge was first issued it received a great deal of criticism from outside the unit - not seen that drawing before!
I am very fortunate to have a couple of attributed ones - here is one.
Worn by 2 SBS only. As you say - a very small unit - Nominal Roll in Geoffrey Courtney's Book 'SBS in World War Two' suggests about 34 at Saltcoats in 1942 before reinforcement at Hillhead 1942-43 of about 65. Far fewer names by the time of posting to Far East - A rare thing.

Marc - I can understand the confusion!

Mike

Last edited by Mike B; 26-05-16 at 06:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-05-16, 06:51 PM
Phill Lockett's Avatar
Phill Lockett Phill Lockett is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Auckland NZ
Posts: 769
Default

Thanks Mike B and all those that have contributed to this thread.

Looks like I have a few more books to get.

Much appreciated for all the input.


Phill
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26-05-16, 07:42 PM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
Mike - EXCEPTIONAL!
The story goes that when the badge was first issued it received a great deal of criticism from outside the unit - not seen that drawing before!
I am very fortunate to have a couple of attributed ones - here is one.
Worn by 2 SBS only. As you say - a very small unit - Nominal Roll in Geoffrey Courtney's Book 'SBS in World War Two' suggests about 34 at Saltcoats in 1942 before reinforcement at Hillhead 1942-43 of about 65. Far fewer names by the time of posting to Far East - A rare thing.

Marc - I can understand the confusion!

Mike
My summary:
2 SBS.Text.04.jpgMike
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.