British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Infantry (& Guards) Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30-11-21, 10:14 AM
magpie's Avatar
magpie magpie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,036
Default 2 Argyll and Sutherland's

I know there can be many variations of a standard badge but would anyone know if these two are just that or something else, first has a smaller circlet and font with overlapping leaf at the bottom, the second would seem to be a narrowed version with leaves tucked in at the sides.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg _20211129_210324~2.jpg (90.0 KB, 66 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-11-21, 03:40 PM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,416
Default

They appear to be alright from I can see, but as always, the reverse is the key.
There seems to be so many variants of this badge it is hard to pin them down.

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-11-21, 04:35 PM
magpie's Avatar
magpie magpie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,036
Default

Thanks you Conrad, I'm not doubting they are OK just more interested in exactly when and perhaps by who used them if anyone knows, they are fine and nicely struck the left one is light in weight compared to the regular types found.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-11-21, 04:38 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,962
Default

I reckon just makers variations.

Whilst solid is the earlier pattern I’ve a solid badge which I’m 100% sure is of WW1 manufacture. Perhaps it was a mistake or the manufacturer couldn’t be bothered, it raises the potential possibly for some to be much later than they should and that would mean more dies and variations.

Personally I think both are lovely crisply detailed examples without any large die flaws, if you ever wanted to move either on please let me know!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-11-21, 04:56 PM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,416
Default

I too agree that they are just maker variants. I am also firmly of the opinion that the solid back badges continued to be made long after they were supposed to be replaced with the voids.

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.