|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Blimey, that hooky GMGR badge went for £77.00....
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately that is the way it goes with the more rare badges. Don't let the unfortunate collector mind set of rarity or "elite" guide your venture. I would strongly recommend focusing on the more common infantry or corps badges to begin with. They are a better bet and the learning curve will be much less painful by that route. They are also far more representative of the British Army and it's history as well. Personally, I can appreciate an old county "fish and chips" badge representing a regiment hundreds of years old that served round the world in the greatest empire ever to be known than any other, bar none.
CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
CB, I totally agree with you!
Terry |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
And now confined to one little island.
__________________
"Not every man can have wisdom. Stupid people have to exist too, because if everyone was wise, then there would be so much good sense in the world that every other person would be driven crazy by it." — Josef Švejk |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
CB - You are so right!
I get a buzz out of simply holding and feeling a Worcester's badge (my home-county regiment) irrespective of its rarity or value and to be honest, I have a real affinity with the "poor bloody infantry" of both wars - I can even appreciate the patina and shape of my hooky Pals badges - fake I know, but the images that the badge bring to mind mean so much to me. Whilst I've got an expert on-line, could I pick your brains please? I bought a Lincolnshire Yeomanry badge, but it's white metal rather than the bronze which my reference book suggests it should be...(a lovely badge all the same, such great definition) - is this a wrong 'un too??? Thanks again CB !! |
#51
|
||||
|
||||
Me too Terry - CB is so right!
G |
|
|