British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Royal Artillery, Royal Engineers and Royal Signals.

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14-09-21, 12:39 PM
Holyboy's Avatar
Holyboy Holyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 691
Default RA Restrike Fakes

Hi what are your thoughts please as this has the tall orb crown point seen on wrong uns
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 60EBE10F-729A-4B7A-AF34-0A31B6690AED.jpg (49.8 KB, 137 views)
File Type: jpg FD87A77F-A75D-437C-826D-8633F5869223.jpg (51.4 KB, 86 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-09-21, 12:42 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default

A standard tall orb fake. Not 100% of them are voided at the far right scroll end giving them the stereotypical notch.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-09-21, 12:54 PM
Holyboy's Avatar
Holyboy Holyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 691
Default

Thanks Luke for confirming
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-09-21, 09:24 AM
Postwarden's Avatar
Postwarden Postwarden is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 3,224
Default

I know I am an older collector but are they really bothering to fake what must be one of the most common British cap badges?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-09-21, 09:30 AM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,034
Default

Presumably going to the trouble of attaching 3 lugs and a spinning wheel make the badge more desirable as an "older" piece or a variation of private purchase?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-09-21, 10:07 AM
magpie's Avatar
magpie magpie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,026
Default

Nothing new with these fakes as they've been around for years.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-09-21, 09:25 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default

These are nothing new as magpie says, they’ve been around since the 1970s/80s.

There are some very weird ones in the Marsh catalogues which logically must’ve cost more to manufacture than the original badges were worth.

As well as the standard KC era RA which is the subject of this thread there was also a GviR RASC and RE plus KC ATS and RAF!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-09-21, 09:03 PM
billy's Avatar
billy billy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Carterton (RAF Brize-Norton) Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,586
Default

What is it that marks these out Luke? these are really common badges, but how does one identify the differences if a fake and a good badge placed side by side? RAF, and Royal Engineers? you would have to be very unfortunate to have picked up some of these!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-09-21, 10:43 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default

I’ll do individual posts on each of the above when I have time to highlight a key trait or two of the offending die Martin Marsh used.

I cannot do comparisons with real ones side-by-side as in some cases there must be dozens of genuine dies!

Yes statistically you would be pretty unlucky to randomly buy a RA, RE, RASC, ATS or RAF and it turn out to be Marsh catalogue example.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17-09-21, 11:10 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default RASC

Not the best catalogue photo of this one but it is sufficient enough to see certain unique details.

Note the very vestigial tail on the letter ‘S’ of CORPS and the large gap between the ‘A’ and ‘L’ of MAL. This demo badge and possibly the one in the catalogue have solid crowns. I also think the jewels in the crown’s band look just a bit too regular as is stereotypical of many of his wares.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-09-21, 11:42 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default RAF

A very basic design with lord knows how many genuine manufacturers and die variations out there so the devil really is in the detail here.

The crown again to my eyes betrays it, the rim shape and jewel orientation. I think it looks very similar to the fake 1st Armoured Motor Battery badge also in the catalogue.

The seeding patterns on the RAF monogram is the best method here to match the illustrated badge with the demo. Tip, look for rows, funny shaped ones or clusters, gaps or big dots that catch your eye most. When you find distinctive one(s) compare it to the catalogue photo.

In general being able to compare and distinguish seeding patterns unique to a die I find a very useful technique, but I appreciate this may seem a bit extreme to some.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg AC8672B9-5596-449D-9611-7E1F1BB754E3.jpeg (113.5 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg CAB8740F-674E-46C4-ACC7-6C3999478AF7.jpg (107.0 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg 2883EDB3-5203-42CD-A35E-AFDD4ED1725D.jpg (117.9 KB, 16 views)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-09-21, 11:59 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default RE

Another poor photo but again it’s still possible to define the die as this one is all about its outline.

Again note the jewels in the crown’s bad too regular, this time all rectangles. The laurel at 10 o’clock pinches inwards noticeably unlike the other side. Between 3 and 5 o’clock the outline of the laurel’s curve is more shallow compared to the other side overall giving it a wonky asymmetrical look,
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 18-09-21, 12:07 AM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default ATS

Last but not least the ATS.

Note the fillet between the crown and top of the T, the jewels again in the crown’s band and the splayed arches. The laurel attachment points to the crown and fillet to the (viewers) right.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 18-09-21, 12:19 AM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,913
Default

Remember as always there are fakes and repros out there beyond the Marsh catalogue example. In many cases his version is the most common but not always the only one on the market e.g. these horrific ‘new’ RASC’s…

So whether it’s just a ‘standard’ badge to the Royal Artillery, Royal Engineers, Royal Army Service Corps, Royal Air Force or Auxiliary Territorial Service beware there are fakes and repros out there and a bit of due diligence is always needed.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3BDD86F3-C50F-49BB-B799-CB81429CD702.jpg (71.1 KB, 37 views)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 18-09-21, 09:09 AM
ajc347 ajc347 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 223
Default

Thank you for posting these examples up Luke.

It’s really helpful to see a photo of an actual badge compared against the poor quality pictures in the Martin Marsh catalogue and I’ve certainly learned a lot from the ones you’ve posted so far. 🙂
__________________
Andy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.