|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Royal Engineers Officers??
Hi all, just received this badge in a pretty ropey lot of badges. It appears to be an officer's badge, cast?, with a strange GVR cypher. Is it genuine, it looks old but the edges of the badge are rough and the overall finish is poor.
Thanks John |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
It is so very crudely cast, I would certainly not be happy with it and would seek a replacement.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Could it be a locally made badge?
Looks like theres a manufacturer's mark on one of the tangs? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, I had not noticed but it says Lambourne & Co Birmingham. It is an old badge, not artificially aged.
John |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
If you can post a better shot of the manufacturer's mark you may flush out some views on whether it's a genuine mark (I thought it may a (Lambourne stamp).
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Here is the best I can do the makers mark. It looks like it's been there a long time, partially obscured by contact marks.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
The badge conforms to no fake die I know.
Despite not being able to see the mark clearly the other features of it look to me, well scream in fact, as being the hand of Lambourne. Not a betting man I would however wager the mark is correct with an underscored o and matches several other OSDs tangs / blades shown in various threads. https://www.britishbadgeforum.com/fo...ad.php?t=77594 https://www.britishbadgeforum.com/fo...3&postcount=22 https://www.britishbadgeforum.com/fo...ad.php?t=23815 https://www.britishbadgeforum.com/fo...8&postcount=12 I certainly should not seek a replacement nor would I in any respect be unhappy with it. An item I would love to have in my collection. Last edited by Luke H; 19-02-21 at 01:00 AM. Reason: Added links |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Unless that blade is a slider cannibalized from another Lambourne badge, which I think it may be, it makes no sense whatsoever being there.
CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hi all.
I have to agree with Luke, the tang with the Lambourne mark is identical to the one on the other side of the badge. If you could handle the badge then you would see the wear on both the badge and tangs is not done by the hand of a forger, it would take a massive effort to get the badge in that condition, there are hundreds of nicks, scratches and bends on the tangs, surely not worth the effort to forge a RE badge. I am happy the badge is a genuine Lambourne badge, I did not know they made cast badges. The cypher is completely different to a usual RE badge of the period, again all the effort to get all those little piercings on the cypher just right is surely beyond the thoughts of a forger, he would copy a standard RE badge. John. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Absolutely not the case at all, they are not sliders, they are blades that have been stamped before the badge was subsequently finished off.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I have a similar RFC with the same stamp, I was not happy with it at the time and I already had many replacements, but, I have never seen or heard of an single example of these badges with an acceptable provenance.
Whilst I do remain open minded, had I been gazetted with a commission over a hundred years ago and been offered a similar cap badge when being fitted with a SD from a tailor, I certainly would have been more than a little disappointed. Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I would dearly love to see your RFC please should you still have it. Indeed I even have a orphanage tin for disowned and unwanted Lambourne badges so should you have it and wish to move it on please do let me know. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Andy
__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Wrong post
|
|
|