British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Common Forums > Reproductions, Restrikes, Fakes, Forgeries, and Copies

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-11-12, 02:16 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,373
Default 98th Shako Plate

I purchased this shako plate last weekend from a dealer who had some good and some bad badges. My first thoughts were that it is a repro and I listed it on E bay with a starting price and description reflecting that. ( It didnt sell ).

Since buying the item it has been crossing my mind that it is heavy and not easily bent with your fingers. It is also very dirty but looks like that may be due to age and not artificial ageing.

It has lugs east and west behind the garter and not the wreath. It is not the same as the modern restrike shako plates you come across but may just be a better copy with some age.

I still think it is probably not right but any thoughts appreciated.

P.B.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_0118.jpg (74.2 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_0119.jpg (75.8 KB, 50 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-12, 09:54 AM
Jeff Mc William's Avatar
Jeff Mc William Jeff Mc William is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Wakefield West Yorks
Posts: 1,061
Default

Difficult one Peter. There are so many fakes on the market these days...but this one does not look like your typical "dud".
Am I mistaken, or does this have traces of gilt on it ? The lugs on the garter are ok for ORs (or perhaps even junior NCOs), but, as you say are not correct for Officers which were positioned on the wreath. I must say tho' (if it is a fake) someone has done a pretty good job with the "patina". Regards. Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-12, 10:05 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,373
Default

Thanks Jeff,

Yes I think you may be right about possible traces of gilt on the rear.

A difficult one to call and shows the long term effect of restrikes on the hobby. ( Fox restrike syndrome ? )

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”

Last edited by Peter Brydon; 03-11-12 at 10:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-12, 08:44 PM
JimD's Avatar
JimD JimD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Gold Coast, Queensland
Posts: 162
Default

The patina on the reverse looks authentic, an interesting find Peter

Cheers
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-12, 08:46 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,373
Default

Thanks Jim

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.