|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm not sure the soldier is wearing dreadlocks. His hair looks to be braided, but I can't see it clearly. In the Canadian Forces, there are exceptions to the traditional haircuts. The exceptions are published in Dress Regulations, so they are "Regulation". Phil |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm not sure if: "...your venerable British Army Shiteater always knew the best way to ..." would go down so well in me book. Regards Chris |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Up until this thread I did not know that 'Squaddie' had fallen from fashion.
The term "Trooper" would possibly be justified in cavalry/armour but not in infantry or support regiment/corps'. The term "Soldier" as a bit too formal. Therefore IMO 'Squaddie' still seems the obvious choice. Eddie |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
"Soldier" certainly won't work here and "Tommy" seems a bit old as the era I'm covering is 1950 to current day. Regards Chris |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
I occasionally come across this person on another forum and she recently got married.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Meant as fun please take it the right way! Andy |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I used the term "Trooper" in my post because that is what they are. Trooper is a rank in the Royal Tank Regiment. We used to have "Privates", Sections, Companies and Battalions prior to the formation of the Royal Armoured Corps at which point we changed to the terminology of the Cavalry. Best wishes Gordon |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Gentlemen,
times do change and "terms" that in the past we used without a second thought, can now be very offenssive to some, whilst still commonly used by the older generation with no malace intended! Paki, Nigger or Chink for example are all words that can see people resigning over! I think in this day and age "Squaddie" is not the term of endearment that it used to be taken as! I certainly think that to include it in a quality reference book, should be deliberated upon? "Troops" could be a "Fits All" term? Andy |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Hi gents,
If squaddie is out of favour, though I can't see why it would be considered offensive? There is another term in current use for ORs. In days past British soldiers were referred to as "Tommies" as in "Tommy Atkins". As I understand it the the abreviation of "Tommies" to "Toms" may be the preserve of the Paras but I have heard it used of late as a generic term to describe British soldiers. I don't think anyone could take offence at this term and it seems to be an apt description, with its roots entrenched in the history of the British army. Regards to all. Ry |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
How about "MEMBER(S) of HM FORCES" This covers one and all of ALL three services.
__________________
JERRY ROYAL ENGINEERS/BRITISH ARMY CORPS & SERVICES/BRITISH LEGION/ROYAL BRITISH LEGION (see albums) |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
The writer of this book obviously didnt think the expression offensive:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Squaddie-Sol.../dp/1845961455 P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )” |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Hi Guys,
Is: "Troopie" a problem? Regards Chris |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Chris,
"Troopie" or "Troopy" is the term used to describe a platoon or troop Commander (1 pip wonder). Regards Ry |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Chris,
please do not go out of your way to revise what you have done if it will cause hassle... The "S" word is one which makes many with whom I work, cringe! However in the right context it would be fine, i.e. Squaddie humour does not seem to ruffle feathers, it 's just when soldiers are tarred with the same brush that feelings can be tested! Andy |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sorry, Troopie just does not fit.
I have never heard of offence being taken at the name Squaddie, and most soldiers identify with it, I don't know of any other name that is fit for purpose as a general name for British soldiers. Eddie |
|
|