British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > General Topics.

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 15-11-21, 06:44 AM
Corey's Avatar
Corey Corey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffMJ View Post
...the Motto is period. (a bit of a miss strike but good)

https://www.paoyeomanry.org.uk/Motto/NoEars2.htm
Great. Thank you.
Here are some closer photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20211115_193803.jpg (59.9 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg 20211115_194035.jpg (60.0 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 20211115_194021.jpg (43.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg 20211115_194000.jpg (47.4 KB, 9 views)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 15-11-21, 01:21 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

The Canadian badges appear to all be Canadian Expeditionary Force era. And all look good from the image.
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 15-11-21, 04:22 PM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,422
Default

The Leinster and 3DG are from different dies. The Surrey is interesting with the technically out of period crown, but just shows that older designs (solid back Argylls comes to mind, but there are more),somehow continued to be made. It is quite crude, as if made from a worn die, but I think genuine period made.
That is also a rather crude Motto, typical of WW1 make.

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 15-11-21, 07:07 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,974
Default

The Surrey is a WW1 manufacturer error there is no mystery. There are period photos of it and the regimental castle Northants and the altered die 2 tower KC Suffolk all being worn in WW1.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 16-11-21, 06:19 AM
Corey's Avatar
Corey Corey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GriffMJ View Post
...the Motto is period. (a bit of a miss strike but good)

https://www.paoyeomanry.org.uk/Motto/NoEars2.htm
I always thought it was Interesting that the 9th lancers had reinforcing bars to the rear but the 16th Lancers didn't.

Was that a variation or just the norm??

Cheers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20211116_190727.jpg (38.6 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg 20211116_190737.jpg (59.7 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg 20211116_190744.jpg (49.7 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg 20211116_190842.jpg (34.6 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg 20211116_190945.jpg (41.0 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg 20211116_190930.jpg (39.2 KB, 16 views)
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 16-11-21, 03:45 PM
Padre's Avatar
Padre Padre is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey View Post
Hey no worries.
It has lugs.
Looking at it I would almost say it's been cast?

Cheers
Yes, sand cast. It was introduced in 1919 and as the RAF was prevalent in the Middle East through the 1920s and 30s and WW2 it could date from any period. Depending on the size it could be a cap or collar badge (most likely the former).

If the RAF Warrant Officer cap badge has flat, square lugs to the rear it would indicate a 1918 to 1920 sort of period.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 16-11-21, 05:48 PM
cbuehler's Avatar
cbuehler cbuehler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,422
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey View Post
I always thought it was Interesting that the 9th lancers had reinforcing bars to the rear but the 16th Lancers didn't.

Was that a variation or just the norm??

Cheers
The 16thL did not need to be reinforced as it's construction obviates the need. Not all 9thL badges are reinforced however.

CB
__________________
"We seldom learn the true want of what we have till it is discovered that we can have no more." Sam. Johnson
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16-11-21, 05:54 PM
Corey's Avatar
Corey Corey is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 122
Default

Here are some close ups.

Cheers
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20211117_064843.jpg (60.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg 20211117_065037.jpg (53.2 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg 20211117_064950.jpg (75.3 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg 20211117_064936.jpg (57.0 KB, 5 views)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-12-21, 10:32 AM
dumdum's Avatar
dumdum dumdum is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,448
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey View Post
Yeah. Make you cry, I guess at the time it was just some fun.
Once bought a badge from an online source. It turned up with two holes drilled in it! Massively annoyed, I was about to contact the seller with some really choice words.

I then checked the photo to see that it clearly showed.....two holes drilled in it.

DOH!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.