British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Common Forums > Reproductions, Restrikes, Fakes, Forgeries, and Copies

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 29-10-15, 06:14 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Shields, Tyne and Wear
Posts: 1,016
Default Imperial Service Badge

Hi all,

I'm looking for some opinions on this imperial service badge.

To me the letters don't look very sharp so I'm wondering if that means this is a fake.

I'm very new to all this so looking for some opinions please.

Thanks

Michael
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2015-10-29 18.10.37.jpg (36.7 KB, 106 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-10-15, 06:24 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,357
Default

Michael,

They were die cast so that might explain why the letters are not sharp but a picture of the back of the badge would help Forum members to give you their opinions.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-10-15, 06:24 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,658
Default

Michael,
from what you show it looks fine to me, there are several variations, some better than others!

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-10-15, 06:44 PM
manchesters's Avatar
manchesters manchesters is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 7,572
Default

Its fine. An original badge

regards
__________________
Simon Butterworth

Manchester Regiment Collector
Rank, Prize & Trade Badges
British & Commonwealth Artillery Badges
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-10-15, 06:48 PM
Shiny's Avatar
Shiny Shiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Shields, Tyne and Wear
Posts: 1,016
Default

Thanks everyone, I'll add a picture of the back but it sounds like I'm ok.

Thanks again,

Michael
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2015-10-29 18.45.37.jpg (18.2 KB, 91 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-10-15, 08:09 PM
wardog's Avatar
wardog wardog is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,502
Default

Best to link to the original ebay page Shiny- as the pictures belong to the seller. Regards, Paul.
http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/forum_rules.htm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-15, 02:40 PM
davidwyke's Avatar
davidwyke davidwyke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,478
Default Brass version of IS badge??

Hi Chaps

Even after over a century these Imperial Service badges are still quite common, I have a few examples in my collection.

However, when glancing through "Medal Yearbook" I was surprised to see that it states they were produced in "Cupro-nickel or brass".

I've seen many examples but only in white metal, never seen a brass example. Has anyone got/seen a brass version?

I think the book may have got it wrong but if they were awarded in both metals, who were the brass badges awarded to?

I should mention that I'm looking at the 2016 edition of the book (item 234A), I'm not sure to what extent the same info appears in earlier editions as I've given my old copies away.

David
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-12-15, 03:03 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,357
Default

Some previous discussion here:

http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...perial+Service

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-12-15, 03:11 PM
davidwyke's Avatar
davidwyke davidwyke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 1,478
Default

Hi Peter

Many thanks for that, seems like the book is correct after all.

The brass version must be far scarcer than the WM, I wonder what the difference signifies, if anything?

David
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-12-15, 03:19 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,357
Default

David,

I have never seen a explanation for the different metals but brass ones must be worth picking up if you come across one.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-12-15, 03:54 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Gents,

The brass ISBs which we see in circulation today are, in my opinion, and to the best of my knowledge, completely bogus. My research to date has revealed nothing as yet in the way of documentary evidence relating to its manufacture, other than a costing estimate from Jennens, in Aug of 1909 (which also included prices for w/m badges). This estimate was submitted to the WO before it was finally decided that they would be made in white-metal only, hence the reason I feel the brass version was never officially manufactured/issued/worn etc.

From the outset the War Office wanted this to be an inexpensive badge, though paradoxically, the w/m version was marginally more expensive in the Jennens estimates.

During the period of the badge's inception, the then Secretary of State, proposed that the King reconsider his initial approval for the badge to be w/m, for a bronze version instead. However, the King was having none of it and aced him out by sticking with his initial decision/approval of the white-metal version.

White-metal and g/m examples shown below:

Regards to all,

image.jpg

Last edited by Jelly Terror; 09-12-15 at 04:43 PM. Reason: Spelling correction
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-12-15, 04:41 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidwyke View Post
...I've seen many examples but only in white metal, never seen a brass example. Has anyone got/seen a brass version... David
David,

Here is an example of a g/m badge:

Regards,

image.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-12-15, 08:23 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Terror View Post
Gents,

The brass ISBs which we see in circulation today are, in my opinion, and to the best of my knowledge, completely bogus. My research to date has revealed nothing as yet in the way of documentary evidence relating to its manufacture, other than a costing estimate from Jennens, in Aug of 1909 (which also included prices for w/m badges). This estimate was submitted to the WO before it was finally decided that they would be made in white-metal only, hence the reason I feel the brass version was never officially manufactured/issued/worn etc.

From the outset the War Office wanted this to be an inexpensive badge, though paradoxically, the w/m version was marginally more expensive in the Jennens estimates.

During the period of the badge's inception, the then Secretary of State, proposed that the King reconsider his initial approval for the badge to be w/m, for a bronze version instead. However, the King was having none of it and aced him out by sticking with his initial decision/approval of the white-metal version.

White-metal and g/m examples shown below:

Regards to all,

Attachment 137290
JT,
I believe Jennens only made officers badges? I'm sure I've a very well made Gm example somewhere, I will dig it out and post images! As theses are awards perhaps they were produced in Gm for officers, rather than private purchase items like other officers insignia?

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-12-15, 08:50 PM
magpie's Avatar
magpie magpie is online now
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,025
Default

Silly question but did officers wear them or were they expected to go as part of their service if need be.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-12-15, 09:09 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,357
Default

I am sure officers did wear the "broach", it is certainly implied that they did in Westlakes "The Territorials 1908-1914 " and I am also sure that I have seen pictures of it been worn by officers but I cannot lay my hand on one at the moment.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.