British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Other Army Departments and Corps Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-04-08, 11:35 PM
P.Jones's Avatar
P.Jones P.Jones is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 82
Default Machine Gun Corps Gaunt plaque

After the recent debate on Gaunt plaques on badges can anyone give any advice on this Machine Gun Corps badge with Gaunt plaque which is on sale on eBay Item number 380018449048

Many thanks,

Philip

Last edited by P.Jones; 22-04-08 at 11:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-04-08, 11:56 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,977
Default

Hi Philip,

I don't like the way the left arch of the crown has been cut away seemingly in the stamping, having said that the age/patina and rear detail doesn't look bad and there also appears to be soldiers friend residue on the back, throw the Gaunt plate into the mix and I'm 6 of one half a dozen of the other on it.

I'm sure a collector of these badges would be able to give you a definite answer maybe from the position of the lugs etc.

That seller has some good stuff atm but also some rubbish so again its 50-50

Hard one to call I think... if I had to make a choice the years have taught me if in doubt walk away.

sorry I can't be of more help,

Cheers,

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-04-08, 12:05 AM
guest_000 guest_000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 497
Default

The badge is genuine a bit of a factory second I would think but period striking for sure.

PAUL
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-04-08, 12:08 AM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,977
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paulbear View Post
The badge is genuine a bit of a factory second I would think but period striking for sure.

PAUL
Hi Paul,

How can you tell, could you point out what to look for please?

Cheers,

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-04-08, 12:54 AM
guest_000 guest_000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 497
Default

Hi the striking is correct also the lugs are seated correctly and are of the correct type. Nice to see the three lug set up on the common imperial badge also. Most fakes with the Gaunt disk use the round type in the centre from what I have observed especially on the NWMP badges

PAUL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-04-08, 05:56 AM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

Yes, I was interested in this one too but I magnified the photo of the plaque - confirmed any doubts I had !
Otherwise I grant you, it looks good BUT unless this is a prototype, the ACD records have the MGC badge with a 'vertical shank' ie slider.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-04-08, 12:11 PM
Luke H's Avatar
Luke H Luke H is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Londoner in exile
Posts: 5,977
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLR View Post
Yes, I was interested in this one too but I magnified the photo of the plaque - confirmed any doubts I had !
Otherwise I grant you, it looks good BUT unless this is a prototype, the ACD records have the MGC badge with a 'vertical shank' ie slider.
Julain,

I'd agree with you, there is a visible splattering of braze around the Gaunt plate but no signs of overspill or splattering around the braze points of the lugs. It makes me think the Gaunt plate was added later.

With all the Gaunt plate revelations of late, the fact the badge doesn't scream 'YES I'M RIGHT' at you and that seller is currently selling a few dodgey dodgey bit there is a substancial risk factor there IMO and if the ACD bible says vertical shank then it makes it academic for me - best off left.

Luke
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-04-08, 02:04 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

I wouldn't be fussed that the plaque is placed crooked though the "mess" around the plaque is a bit susdpicious. It's the actual lettering being ? stippled, ie made by a series of dots that really stinks - any real plaque would be stamped !!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-04-08, 02:25 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,795
Default

I agree with Julian. Lugged MG badges are not a good sign. The plaque does not compare well to a genuine one. The lettering should indeed be stamped. I would not buy it.

Alan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-04-08, 02:56 PM
guest_000 guest_000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 497
Default

I don't know whether gaunt had a seperate contract with Canada for this type of badge with lugs but I personally would be adverse to seeing it with a slider. The lugs on this are correct what may be going on here is the disk may be an add on TO ENHANCE the badge sale .

PAUL
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-04-08, 03:43 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,795
Default

Paul,

The lugs may be correct for a Canadian badge but the British MG Corps were only supplied with slidered versions. Julian has dug through the Army records which states that this was the case. If the lugs are Ok then it is not a British badge but may have been made for Canadians. I defer to the Canadian collectors knowlegde as to that one.

Alan

Last edited by Alan O; 23-04-08 at 03:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-04-08, 04:09 PM
guest_000 guest_000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 497
Default

I do have these with Canada banner three lug configuration ,this is why I got into the mix gentlemen. It would apprear then that Gaunt was catering to the two contracts and with the badge similarities there is little doubt that there was significant cross pollination of the types me thinks

PAUL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-04-08, 06:47 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

I haven't been able to get back until now. I rather think that particular badge has gone now, and I hope the buyer is very happy.

Right, there are two points to be made;
It was not the badge that I was concerned about, it looked very good, it may be Canadian for all I know.
What I am in very little doubt about was that the 'Gaunt plaque' itself was a fake. I cannot believe that a construction as bad as that came from that esteemed company. In any case, creating the lettering by hammering points takes a lot longer than stamping it !
As a number of people have pointed out, there does seem to be a rash of applying fake plaques to (mostly) real badges in order to increase their value !

As to the ACD records, yes I have been through them with a toothcomb but only in detail for the King's which is the unit I collect and research. Other things catch my eye every now and again (like the Welsh/Welch ref I copied here the other day for our Welsh collecting chums).
I'm interested in the MGC because my grandfather transferred to them from the Kings, so I made a quick note of the following
Badge - Forage Cap and Foreign Service Helmet, GM, sealed 29.12.1915 Pattern 8625/1915
Title with plate and pin. "M.G.C." sealed 29.12.1015, Pattern 8626/1915.
Officers collar badge, GM Bronzed, sealed 15.3.1916, Pattern 8708/1916
(I think I'm right in saying this was about the only piece of officer's insignia to be "issued")

You will see that I don't seem to have noted whether the cap badge was with a slider or loops, either there was no mention - unlikely - or I forgot to copy it out (I'll check next time I'm at Kew).
What I can tell you is that a large WO order of April 1916 specified, under the heading, 'Badges, Forage Cap - with vertical shank' 30,000 MGC badges (ptn 8625/1915) at a price/cost of 27 shillings per gross. So I would guess that it was originally sealed with a VS !

So, Canadian MGC badges may indeed have been made with loops - but you can't say they were definitely made by Gaunts from this example.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23-04-08, 07:37 PM
guest_000 guest_000 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 497
Default

I have an extensive CEF collection which includes much MG material and I assure you that this badge type with three lug configuation plain, with CANADA banner, with numeral and CANADA banner all with GAUNT plaque do in fact exist

PAUL
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-04-08, 09:10 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

Paul, it's good to hear about the Canadian badges and I think there are things to be learnt by collectors on both sides of the pond about the similarities and differences between "empire" insignia in the 1st WW period.
The British Army Clothing Department did order some S African and a few colonial pieces but I haven't yet found any evidence (certainly during the 1st WW) that they had anything to do with the production or procurement of Canadian (or, eg, Australian) insignia.
Gaunts, as a private company, could and did make insignia for anyone, not just the British government. Why the Canadian MGC badges had loops and the British ones sliders I have no idea.
I would like to ask though, whether you have come across these crude stippled 'Gaunt' plaques on Canadian badges.
Julian
They
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.