British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Infantry (& Guards) Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20-10-15, 12:52 PM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default 1 piece die struck 10th Lpool Scottish

Not had one of this type before,though have a few of the 2piece examples, seems ok to me but hoping someone can confirm and give period of use/ manufacture
Thanks
Paul
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (97.2 KB, 39 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-10-15, 12:53 PM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Reverse image
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (91.8 KB, 40 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-10-15, 01:28 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Paul,

According to Dennis Reeves the curator of the Liverpool Scottish Museum, the one piece badge " was simply a wartime economy pattern " ( his letter to me dated 25/9/2010 )

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-10-15, 03:11 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,785
Default

By wartime 'economy' do we actually mean a post 1915 WD-supplied badge who went for a single piece badge as better value rather than the pre-1915 TF bought badges where cost and labour time was not so important. My point is the change was made by the change of supplier to the WD, rather than a decision to change the design to a more economical pattern by the original TF supplier.

I am conscious not to go down the mis-leading 'all brass' economy discussion as there was no such thing for this badge.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-10-15, 03:28 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Alan,

Next time I speak to , or correspond with Dennis I will ask him if he has any more information.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-10-15, 03:36 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,785
Default

I just wonder whether the WD ever made a 2 part badge? I suspect that they went straight to the one-piece badge when they took the decision to take over the supply of them.

I am much happier with the one-piece badges. As we know that the bi-metal badge is spurious (despite being in Bloomers) then as someone had superb dies to make 2 part badges, how do you tell one their products if they made any in all w/m?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-10-15, 03:56 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

The spurious bi metal badges were doing the rounds in the 1970`s, one of the examples I had was bought from the lists that Hugh King used to send out. ( see article in Crown Imperial Autumn 1998 page 25 fig 1. )

I have commented before on the fact that at one time two piece 10th ( Scottish ) bn. KLR cap badges were extremely difficult to find ,these days you will usually find a couple of examples on E bay at any time. One can draw one`s own conclusions as to how this might be the case.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-10-15, 06:17 PM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan O View Post
I just wonder whether the WD ever made a 2 part badge? I suspect that they went straight to the one-piece badge when they took the decision to take over the supply of them.

I am much happier with the one-piece badges. As we know that the bi-metal badge is spurious (despite being in Bloomers) then as someone had superb dies to make 2 part badges, how do you tell one their products if they made any in all w/m?
Hi Alan, I guess you are questioning the validity of some of the many 2 piece badges available. It is one badge that I have a number of with the hope at least a couple are original,
Two examples I have in the images.
The left hand badge came with the adapted pin which I hope is period
The right hand badge has w/m lugs and a w/m gaunt plaque
Any comments on both appreciated
I will post front images
Paul
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (59.4 KB, 30 views)

Last edited by Paul Spellman; 20-10-15 at 06:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 20-10-15, 06:18 PM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Front
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (62.0 KB, 27 views)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-10-15, 07:58 PM
KLR's Avatar
KLR KLR is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,055
Default

Various manufacturers pattern books show that the two piece badge was made probably before and certainly during the 1st WW.
Over many years looking at what badges are available, the 2 piece one actually seems more common than the 1 piece. I don't think many people believe in the 2 piece being worn by NCOs and the 1 piece by ORs - even though the 1 piece was obviously easier to make. My feeling - yet to be proven - is that the 1 piece was a post (1st) war production. My great uncle was the MO of the Liverpool Scottish in the 1930s (poss earlier ???) and his badge (which I have) is 1 piece (even though one might have expected him to have an officer's silver one !?) - OK not conclusive but I hope to do more research on this.


By the way Paul, your right hand badge is a sporran badge - regardless of fittings. That type is different to the ordinary OR glengarry badge - but actually the same design as the officer's one !

Last edited by KLR; 20-10-15 at 08:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-10-15, 08:01 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Spellman View Post
Hi Alan, I guess you are questioning the validity of some of the many 2 piece badges available. It is one badge that I have a number of with the hope at least a couple are original,
Two examples I have in the images.
The left hand badge came with the adapted pin which I hope is period
The right hand badge has w/m lugs and a w/m gaunt plaque
Any comments on both appreciated
I will post front images
Paul
Paul

Unfortunately my point was that if you can only tell the old bi-metal restrikes are fakes because the wrong metal was used some 40 years ago but the dies are perfect then you have no hope of spotting any all w/m ones which were made at that time from the very same dies.

Alan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:30 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.