British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-18, 02:15 AM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default Good Conduct Chevrons - RFC/RNAS

Did the RAF's two antecedent units wear 'good conduct' chevrons?

RAF.jpg

With thanks,

JT

Last edited by Jelly Terror; 06-07-18 at 04:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-18, 06:25 AM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,202
Default

As a de facto Army unit the Royal Flying Corps did so. I don’t know about the RNAS.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-18, 07:28 AM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Looking at the uniforms, the group in the photograph are members of the RAF, circa 1920's.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Terror View Post
Did the RAF's two antecedent units wear 'good conduct' chevrons?

Attachment 190671

With thanks,

JT
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-18, 02:32 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Kelley View Post
Looking at the uniforms, the group in the photograph are members of the RAF, circa 1920's.
Oops! Could've made that a bit clearer at the outset actually, couldn't I?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-07-18, 02:30 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Indeed, but, notwithstanding, both members of the RNAS and RFC, who were so entitled, certainly did wear good conduct chevrons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Terror View Post
Oops! Could've made that a bit clearer at the outset actually, couldn't I?

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-07-18, 02:52 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Terror View Post
Did the RAF's two antecedent units wear 'good conduct' chevrons?

Attachment 190671

With thanks,

JT
With its antecedents of the Royal Engineers and the Royal Flying Corps, both of them army formations, it seems inevitable that long-serving soldiers who made the full transition to the Royal Air Force in 1918 would have brought with them some Good Conduct badges. The formal RAF introduction was by Air Ministry Order 720 of 12th August 1920, with up to three available. The badges were to be worn in the same manner as the army, but it was not until two years later that they were confined to ranks below substantive corporal. No less a character than TE Lawrence, under the pseudonym of Aircraftsman TE Shaw qualified for his first badge 12th March 1925, and his second on 12th March 1931.
King’s Regulations and Air Council Instructions 1940 gave the periods as three, eight and thirteen years [same as RN, whereas RM followed army criteria], and the awards were still being made through the Second World War. My father wore one, for example.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-18, 03:11 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

I think you will find that the two "antecedents" of the Royal Air Force were actually the Royal Naval Air Service and the Royal Flying Corps.
A man could enlist into the RFC directly without having had any prior service in the Army.


Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
With its antecedents of the Royal Engineers and the Royal Flying Corps, both of them army formations, it seems inevitable that long-serving soldiers who made the full transition to the Royal Air Force in 1918 would have brought with them some Good Conduct badges. The formal RAF introduction was by Air Ministry Order 720 of 12th August 1920, with up to three available. The badges were to be worn in the same manner as the army, but it was not until two years later that they were confined to ranks below substantive corporal. No less a character than TE Lawrence, under the pseudonym of Aircraftsman TE Shaw qualified for his first badge 12th March 1925, and his second on 12th March 1931.
King’s Regulations and Air Council Instructions 1940 gave the periods as three, eight and thirteen years [same as RN, whereas RM followed army criteria], and the awards were still being made through the Second World War. My father wore one, for example.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-07-18, 05:14 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,456
Default

and there was me thinking the Royal Flying Corps was part of the army, just like it says in the Army List and the Pay Warrant!
The antecedents of the RFC were various balloon and kite iterations of the Royal Engineers.
All of whom qualified under army rules for GC badges below corporal [or equivalent] full rank.

I would be interested to have chapter and verse of RNAS wearing GC badges other than under the RN regulations. It seems intrinsically unlikely. RN Division just possibly?

After 1907 the army badges ceased to carry extra pay [excepting men with reserved rights], and thus diverged from the RN system which continued to pay. The other obvious differences army/RN were position of wear, and the rank cut-offs.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-07-18, 06:17 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

The men in the photograph shown in the original post are very clearly members of the RAF and not the RFC, are you suggesting that the RAF was not created by the merger of RNAS and RFC?
A man need not have served in the RE, RFC or RNAS prior to joining the RAF to wear those chevrons.
Members of the RNAS, who were so entitled, did wear chevrons below any Rating and Qualification badge they were entitled to as shown in AdWO in ADM182.


Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
and there was me thinking the Royal Flying Corps was part of the army, just like it says in the Army List and the Pay Warrant!
The antecedents of the RFC were various balloon and kite iterations of the Royal Engineers.
All of whom qualified under army rules for GC badges below corporal [or equivalent] full rank.

I would be interested to have chapter and verse of RNAS wearing GC badges other than under the RN regulations. It seems intrinsically unlikely. RN Division just possibly?

After 1907 the army badges ceased to carry extra pay [excepting men with reserved rights], and thus diverged from the RN system which continued to pay. The other obvious differences army/RN were position of wear, and the rank cut-offs.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-07-18, 07:55 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,456
Default

The men in the photograph shown in the original post are very clearly members of the RAF and not the RFC, are you suggesting that the RAF was not created by the merger of RNAS and RFC? Of course not, what makes you think that?

A man need not have served in the RE, RFC or RNAS prior to joining the RAF to wear those chevrons. I did not suggest that, surely?

Members of the RNAS, who were so entitled, did wear chevrons below any Rating and Qualification badge they were entitled to as shown in AdWO in ADM182. As I do not have access to the reference, could you scan or precis it please? Am I correct in believing that these are RN badges under the Admiralty rules?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-07-18, 08:22 PM
Jelly Terror's Avatar
Jelly Terror Jelly Terror is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,783
Default

Many thanks for your responses.

Regards to all,

JT
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-07-18, 09:04 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,456
Default

Thank you.
I am still curious about AdWO in ADM182.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13-07-18, 07:27 AM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Although the men in the photograph are wearing RAF uniforms, unless you actually know their actual identities, it is simply not possible to comment on any prior service.
Regarding the RNAS, their Good Conduct badges were worn below any Rate and Qualification badge a particular man was entitled to, upon the left sleeve as per Admiralty orders.
They took form of inverted lace chevrons, with the first being awarded for three years service, the second for five years and the third for thirteen years.
They are normally very clearly shown for individual men in the Register of Service in ADM188.
On the 31st of March 1918, the final entries were made for those men before they were transferred to the RAF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jelly Terror View Post
Many thanks for your responses.

Regards to all,

JT
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 13-07-18, 02:17 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Kelley View Post
Although the men in the photograph are wearing RAF uniforms, unless you actually know their actual identities, it is simply not possible to comment on any prior service.
Regarding the RNAS, their Good Conduct badges were worn below any Rate and Qualification badge a particular man was entitled to, upon the left sleeve as per Admiralty orders.
They took form of inverted lace chevrons, with the first being awarded for three years service, the second for five years and the third for thirteen years.
They are normally very clearly shown for individual men in the Register of Service in ADM188.
On the 31st of March 1918, the final entries were made for those men before they were transferred to the RAF.
Thank you very much
[I note that, like me, you are a purist when it comes to chevrons "inverted". Its a very unfashionable stance, because normally these days used for LCpl Cpl Sgt point down ..... I have even seen that on sealed patterns. Indeed]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
good conduct chevrons, raf, rfc, rnas

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.