British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Canadian Military Insignia > Infantry

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25-01-12, 11:43 PM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default Royal Rifles and Winnipeg Grenadiers

A question about the designation of the 1st Bn Royal Rifles and 1st Bn Winnipeg Grenadiers. Both units were mauled at Hong Kong, and surrendered to the Japanese, the surviving men of the battalions becoming PoW's. Both battalions were later re-constituted in the Active Service force in Canada. But, both battalions were identified as the 1st Bn of the respective regiments. How can this be? The 1st Bn surrendered at Hong Kong. Should not the re-constituted battalions in Canada be a subsequent number?
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-01-12, 12:27 AM
Phillip Herring's Avatar
Phillip Herring Phillip Herring is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,420
Default

Consider that with many (most?) active battalions, the battalion would mobilize, and the reserve battalion that paraded as a militia unit became the 2nd Battalion.
In the case of the Hong Kong battalions, they no longer existed.

Phil
__________________
Courtesy of The Canadian Forces:
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-.../lineages.html

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur

Hanlon's razor: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-01-12, 01:18 AM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,538
Default

I guess that is the crux of my question Phil. If they no longer "existed", they would have to have been declared as such? I can't find any documentation about either declaring the battalions as non-effective, or disbanded.
A corollary question may be what is the legal status of a "battalion" that has surrendered? Or is it only the soldiers that surrender and the battalion continues to exist on paper?
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-01-12, 02:28 AM
BWEF's Avatar
BWEF BWEF is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill A View Post
I guess that is the crux of my question Phil. If they no longer "existed", they would have to have been declared as such? I can't find any documentation about either declaring the battalions as non-effective, or disbanded.
A corollary question may be what is the legal status of a "battalion" that has surrendered? Or is it only the soldiers that surrender and the battalion continues to exist on paper?
I don't know if this helps, being the British army.

The 1st battalion of the Middlesex regiment was the machine gun battalion of the 15th Scottish division, and landed in Normandy.

The 1st battalion of the Middlesex regiment was also captured at Hong Kong in December 1941.

One of the Middlesex's TA battalions had been re-numbered in order to preserve continuity, which is how a battlion captured at Hong Kong fought in NW Europe 1944-45. Sort of.
__________________
Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.