British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > General Topics.

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-03-21, 04:58 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,372
Default Portrait of Loyals Territorial Officer.

Interesting photo on famous auction website showing Territorial “T” being worn above the collar badge, can’t remember seeing them being worn in that position before.

P.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 8AA66CFE-FEFE-4CF7-AE31-FCC0468CAC4B.jpg (25.3 KB, 60 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-03-21, 05:26 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,136
Default

I've never seen that positioning of the "T" before in a photograph.
There wouldn't be room fit it under the badge - any chance this officer is a regular who's now TF and has managed to wear this arrangement rather than reposition the collar badge or purchase a new tunic?
I would imagine the higher his rank the more likely the badge arrangement being tolerated?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-03-21, 11:11 AM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,372
Default

Leigh, I seem to recall Ray Westlake in a book or article on Territorial shoulder titles saying Territorial other ranks didn’t like being identified as such and so removed the top “T” from their titles, not sure how officers would have felt, but I would assume they would have been happy to be identified as Territorials. Notwithstanding all that, I have never seen a picture with the “T” in that position either.

Peter
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-03-21, 12:22 PM
grey_green_acorn's Avatar
grey_green_acorn grey_green_acorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 5,857
Default

Is it the case that the Ts under collar badges were initially worn at the point of the longer collar of the closed collar Service Dress tunic. When the open collar tunic (worn with collar and tie) was introduced the stepped collar style left even less space for the T to sit below the larger regimental collar badges?

Tim
__________________
"Manui dat cognitio vires - Knowledge gives strength to the arm"
"Better to know it but not need it than to need it and not know it!"
"Have more than thou showest, speak less than thou knowest."

Last edited by grey_green_acorn; 28-03-21 at 07:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-03-21, 04:56 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,372
Default

Tim, it was was certainly a squeeze with the closed collar.

Peter
Attached Images
File Type: jpg FCC284CB-6ED1-475D-BC0A-67172EE72077.jpg (30.2 KB, 16 views)
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28-03-21, 05:06 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Brydon View Post
Leigh, I seem to recall Ray Westlake in a book or article on Territorial shoulder titles saying Territorial other ranks didn’t like being identified as such and so removed the top “T” from their titles, not sure how officers would have felt, but I would assume they would have been happy to be identified as Territorials. Notwithstanding all that, I have never seen a picture with the “T” in that position either.

Peter
I'm thinking of the practicality of continuing usage of a regulars tunic without having to reposition the collar badges to facilitate the "T"s below and thereby leaving exposed holes in the fabric - I hadn't heard that bit of info re the "T"s being removed, that's interesting - given the community spirit and accompanying esprit de coeur of TF units of the time Id've thought the TF men wouldn't feel that there was a "stigma" attached - perhaps that was more of a Kitchener Volunteer and conscript attitude as the war progressed and personnel were posted hitherr and thither?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.