British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Other Army Departments and Corps Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-09-16, 03:05 AM
Voltigeur's Avatar
Voltigeur Voltigeur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal,Canada.
Posts: 5,778
Default Auxiliary Unit Essex Group 8,

HU 66122
Group photograph of Auxiliary Unit Essex Group 8, including Captain Jack Ford (front row centre, in beret), Lieutenant Bill Heath (left of Captain Ford, with moustache), Second Lieutenant Bob Baptie (right of Captain Ford, clean shaven), Privates Michael Ford (third right back row), Donald Handscombe (third left middle row), and David Antill (second left back row).
http://media.iwm.org.uk/iwm/mediaLib...4224/large.jpg
__________________
"There truly exists but one perfect order: that of cemeteries. The dead never complain and they enjoy their equality in silence." -

“There are things we know that we know,” “There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know.”
Donald Rumsfeld, before the Iraqi Invasion,2003.

Age is something that doesn't matter, unless you are a cheese.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-09-16, 12:43 PM
Jack8 Jack8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 658
Default

Interesting photograph, although it is hard to see if they are wearing the shoulder designation (probably 203), the tell tale pistol lanyards and what looks like black leather holsters are evident.

According to the Coleshill site if they they are wearing black leather holsters then the pistol would have been the Colt .32 which were New York Police Department surplus.

Jack
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-09-16, 05:49 PM
Belly's Avatar
Belly Belly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 592
Default

Has anyone ever seen any period photos of the Auxiliary Units actually wearing the printed 201/2/3 arm badges?
If so I'd love to see them, there are none here: http://www.coleshillhouse.com/

cheers
Paul
__________________
Army Commando: Setting Europe ablaze since 1940
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-09-16, 12:45 PM
Mike B Mike B is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,583
Default

Excellent link Paul!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-09-16, 08:59 PM
Jack8 Jack8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Belly View Post
Has anyone ever seen any period photos of the Auxiliary Units actually wearing the printed 201/2/3 arm badges?
If so I'd love to see them, there are none here: http://www.coleshillhouse.com/

cheers
Paul
I only have this image that I have cropped as it was given to me in confidence. You can just about make out the 2 and 0 of 203 and DO of DOR for Dorset.

Jack

image.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-09-16, 06:23 AM
Belly's Avatar
Belly Belly is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 592
Thumbs up

Jack
That's brilliant, that really is the only image I've ever seen of them being worn, I was beginning to wonder if they were ever issued
Thanks for sharing
Paul
__________________
Army Commando: Setting Europe ablaze since 1940

Last edited by Belly; 25-09-16 at 06:51 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-09-16, 04:56 PM
Mike B Mike B is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,583
Default

Jack and Paul
Your eyesight will probably be far better than mine - but is the central figure a '0'? - obviously great if it is. But it looks like it could be a '9'. It may be me of course. I am not sure of Dorset unit numerals and acknowledge 29 may not exist. Apologies for muddying the water if I am in deed incorrect.
All the best
Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-09-16, 08:50 PM
Jack8 Jack8 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B View Post
Jack and Paul
Your eyesight will probably be far better than mine - but is the central figure a '0'? - obviously great if it is. But it looks like it could be a '9'. It may be me of course. I am not sure of Dorset unit numerals and acknowledge 29 may not exist. Apologies for muddying the water if I am in deed incorrect.
All the best
Mike
Hi Mike

I appreciate that it is difficult to see and I wish I could be more specific about the subject in the photograph, but all I can say is that the full named photograph was obtained by the person who gave me a copy after interviewing ex members of his local Dorset Auxiliary Units.

The Dorset numerals I believe were 1 to 7, other possibilities beginning with D that had battalion numbers exceeding 20 were Devon DVN with 25 and Durham DHM with 26, the source for this being "Stand Down" by Len Whittaker. Also all county designations beginning with D had three letters only which adds weight to the probability of the numeral having three digits looking at the in line stitching arrangement of the insignia in the photograph.


Jack.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-09-16, 09:20 PM
Mike B Mike B is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West
Posts: 2,583
Default

Jack
Thanks for the clarification which is very convincing. The spacing does in deed favour a three digit unit number as you say.
Regards
Mike
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.