|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A couple more to check
Hi All
Are these badges good or bad? Westmoreland & Cumberland Yeo & Suffolk Reg. Thanks, cheers, Alex |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No opinions? My guess is the W&C is questionable but I think the Suffolk is ok.
Any ideas? Thanks. Cheers, Alex |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
My Suffolks has brazing holes so would not really be happy with that one. Denis
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
The Suffolks was worn from 1908ish to 1916 so there may be ore than one maker. I would be happy with it.
I like the W&C yeo especially as the wreath tips do not meet the crown nor is it one of the flat faced Marsh badges. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I do not regard the WCY as genuine.
Whilst it’s not the Marsh fake as Alan notes it nonetheless has very poor coarse seeding, rounded letter ends. Your example is a more convincing strike (save behind the crown) but it is from the same die as the one below which is very flat, poor reverse detail, iffy metal, modern slider… https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/255109837...mis&media=COPY |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Isn't the script a bit rounded on the WCY
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Perhaps someone has been creative with a fret saw. The originals are domed rather than flat so in the hand is better than a photo.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There are tell-tale signs such as a non hanging "v" on GvR Household Cavalry badges, as well as others which are easy to spot, but otherwise it can be difficult, the TF Suffolk is a badge which I would rather see blowholes if it was mine, but I would not dismiss it without having it in my hand. An opinion Rob |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks everyone. Yes, the W&C is very flat, one for the bin.
I am fairly sure the Suffolks without blowholes has been discussed on here in the past, which is why I took a chance on this one. My feeling is that it is ok, though may be wrong. Cheers, Alex |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|