|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Agreed. There’s no die based on this Gaunt OSD as I’’m aware. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Hi,
I just picked the 19th Bn badge up, came from a family, any thoughts? Cheers, Rick |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Regards to all, JT Last edited by Jelly Terror; 24-06-23 at 09:29 AM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, the crown looks very close to mine, slider marked by Woodward. May be yours has been a little more polished....
Regards Markus |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Guys,
much appreciated, it came with a group of other medals and badges so I have no idea of a realistic value on it's own, £15 maybe? Rick |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
That would be a fair price and should elicit a quick sale. They are common badges.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
White Metal version
Well until this showed up I did not believe it existed despite a white metal badge being mentioned in KK.
I have seen many FN die restrikes and a couple fake die versions in WM but never one I would regard as genuine, until now. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
This is mine brass 1899-02 - possibly the same die?
This is the other w/m version which I am dubious about. Last edited by Alan O; 27-06-23 at 03:22 PM. |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Correct Alan, same die as your GM example. The crown is a distinctive shape as too is the ‘-02’ in which each digit is raised slightly higher than the last v’s the 1899.
Alas the WM version you show is indeed the commonly seen WM fake. |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
The GM one is unmarked I am afriad.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Sadly I’ve never seen one from that die with a marker marked slider either.
Maybe one day something will turn up that will also help date it and identify the maker or use. Some better pics after a gentle clean to remove the corrosion. |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
My Gaunt OSD, which looks to be the same die as Luke's (post # 15)
Gaunt OSD a.jpgGaunt OSD b.jpg JT |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
WM Version
Thanks Luke and Alan for the posts re WM version.
Saved me from buying a dud. Chris Last edited by CAM; 29-07-23 at 06:10 PM. Reason: typo |
|
|