|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not best known for my accurate measuring skills but it's about 43mm from top of knot to bottom of slider.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Better still would be from top of knot to the bottom of the bugle ! (ie the badge not the fixtures)
Take some measuring classes as that is a key to badge identification. The KLR School of Badge Measurements comes highly recommended ! |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'm going to be a poor work man and blame my tools, can't find a decent tape measure that the end has't fallen off of. Your book isn't expensive is it? I'm fed up with expensive books |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
A shame if its a duffer Ali, the last three of his service number was a nice touch for a faker!
Here is my example, good I think and came with its cap still attached to it.
__________________
Regards, Jerry |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I was only really interested in the number to be honest and the badge is going back where it came from so no biggy. He'll also be getting a flea in his ear |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Better late than never !
The size indicates that it is the cap badge authorised on 30th May 1951 as Pattern 14639. Also used as the pattern for the AA version. Obsolete in (?)1958 |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you Julian, your a star, see I thought it was a late one! OK I didn't think it was a duff one but the late bit I got right
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not a KSLI expert but it looks alright to me !
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Well your not the only person that's said that, but someone else is saying it isn't and the S should be fatter and the strike better. And if it was good it would be scarce. So now I'm in a world of confusion
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Have just weighed the badge and it's about 10-11 g's. In case anybody wants to know its full vital statistics.
Last edited by Tigerlily; 14-05-16 at 04:04 PM. Reason: Gram's not Kilograms. I did go to school. A bit anyway. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Alli,
I hope you mean g's and not KG's That would make it a very heavy badge!! In my humble opinion after your initial disappointment I think it has a few more positives than negatives in size and weight, the strike looks ok to me and it seems to be a beret badge. If someone else has one it would be good to compare Paul |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Crap, yes!! Told you I wasn't good at measuring! Are you sure you don't want me to make a cake? I'll edit that in a sec.
Thanks agony aunt and yes a comparison would be very good. |
#28
|
||||
|
||||
I'm sure a lot of men will be queuing for your measuring stick
Paul |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, I could elaborate there but perhaps I should maintain a discreet silence
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
What you need is a old example!
|
|
|