View Single Post
  #42  
Old 22-02-21, 01:18 PM
High Wood's Avatar
High Wood High Wood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,553
Default

Wow, what an interesting discussion, so full of emotion and so lacking in reasoned argument.

For the sake of clarity, I will just state my point of view for those who might like to hear it before I stop posting on the forum.

My contention regarding that London Rifle Brigade cap badges is that the badge illustrated has some of the classic flaws associated with a badly worn but original die and therefore may be a restrike in the truest sense of the word.

The badge was worn between 1908 until sometime after the Great War, but neither K&K nor John Gaylor give a date for the change to the newer badge with the Great War battle honours.

What we do know is that Territorial Battalions ordered their cap badge from private sources at a regimental level. Their cap badges were not issued by the War Office until about 1915. So presumably, the London Rifle Brigade ordered their badges from a maker, who made their own die, and had agreed production runs of say 10,000 badges at a time.

If the L.R.B. recruited an average of 500 men per year and issued two badges per man, a run of 10,000 badges would, in peace time conditions should have lasted until 1918. As we know, the Great War broke out in 1914 and the demand for their cap badges increased exponentially, as the L.R.B. added two extra battalions.

So for the sake of argument, the L.R.B. ordered another 10,000 badges from the manufactures, who used the original die rather than cutting another set. Many of these later badges would show flaws from the wear and tear to the die.

I do not know know how many badges a case hardened steel die can produce before they are worn out, but there must be a upper limit before the badge quality becomes unacceptable, even with lowering the quality threshold to meet war time demand.

I do not know what happened when the War Office took over the issuing of badges to territorial battalions, they may have approved the design of the existing badge and placed the order with the original supplier, or, insisted on a new pattern with a completely new set of dies.

We do know that the old badge and sets of dies became obsolete when the new badge was introduced in the 1920s.

So what happened to the original dies? They were either destroyed, sold for scrap or kept in a cupboard gathering dust for years on end.

In theory, there should have been no further use for them, but suppose members of the London Rifle Brigade's Old Comrades Association decided that they didn't want to wear the new issued cap badge at the Cenotaph or down at the local branch of the British Legion.

It is entirely plausible that they approached the original manufacturer to place an order for a batch of original badges.

It is also entirely plausible that the manufacturer said, "I need a minimum run of 1,000 badges and if I have to cut a new die they will cost 7/6d each but, if I use the old die you can have them at one shilling each." If this was the case another 1,000 re-struck badges with die faults would appear on the market.

Another possibility is that around 50 years someone realised that there was a demand for L.R.B. cap badges and bought the original but by now, very worn die and started their own production run, releasing thousands more worn re-struck badges onto the market.

All of this is conjecture and cannot be proved without looking at the manufacturer's order book. It is of course possible and entirely probable and would explain the plethora of London Rifle Brigade cap badges with die faults that are about.

I know of four cap badges that share some of the same faults and presume that the dies deteriorated with use, so that some have more faults than others.

I do not believe that the London Rifle Brigade would have accepted a badge with faults from a badly cut die when they accepted their first batch of badges.

I do not believe that no member of the London Rifle Brigade was ever issued a cap badge that didn't have faults.

I do believe that the London Rifle Brigade may have had to accept badges of a lesser quality due to the demands of war time badge production.

And finally, I do not believe that I should change my opinion because another forum member hectors, using provocative and emotive language, whilst refusing to engage in reasoned debate.

If I am wrong, show me wear I have gone wrong, convince me with logical argument, facts and evidence and do not assume that I am familiar with, or, have had the time to read every post that you have ever uploaded.

I can see now why so many members of this forum refuse to raise their heads above the parapet and offer an opinion. It really isn't worth it.
Reply With Quote