I wonder if the 'booklet' contained an acknowledgement to Capt.Daybell and this has caused the confusion ? If it was "compiled" from articles in Crown Imperial that he had produced/sent in then that may explain the misunderstanding.
I think that information included in the articles will have been 'referenced' in other articles/books and the author/source credited , so as long it it is not used for financial gain I don't see it as a problem.
Last edited by mike_vee; 01-05-20 at 11:58 AM.
|