British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Infantry (& Guards) Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-17, 07:12 AM
red rags red rags is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: portadown
Posts: 238
Default Gurkha help please

Can any member confirm if the backing on the 6th badge is issue or a collector embellishment?

Also any idea of the maker of the 3rd badge, looks UK made, dark toning illustrates crown of different metal

THANKS
Attached Images
File Type: jpg gurk1372.jpg (34.7 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg gurk2373.jpg (36.3 KB, 36 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-17, 09:12 AM
engr9266's Avatar
engr9266 engr9266 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Costa Del BOGNOR REGIS by the Sea UK
Posts: 3,853
Default

The 6th Gurkha looks to be a HOME made boss/backing for the badge .It should be as K&K 2075 as far as I know.
__________________

JERRY
ROYAL ENGINEERS/BRITISH ARMY CORPS & SERVICES/BRITISH LEGION/ROYAL BRITISH LEGION (see albums)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-17, 09:19 AM
red rags red rags is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: portadown
Posts: 238
Default Not collector done?

Thanks, the dealer had 2 with this OLD backing glued to the brass plate, now dried out & loose - both badges being different, but this the more attractive example.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-17, 06:21 AM
gurkharifles's Avatar
gurkharifles gurkharifles is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,019
Default

The 6th Badge, is a cap badge worn by all ranks on the Kilmarnock cap and the beret between 1950 > 1960. As far as I'm aware the Regt never wore a back backing of any description. So I think you are safe to assume that the cloth has been put there for display embellishment. As for the 3rd - something of a curio but the main body of the back looks very much like a reproduction - but then why go to the trouble of replacing the crown? Hope this helps Tim.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-08-17, 06:54 AM
red rags red rags is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: portadown
Posts: 238
Default Curious?

Dear All, Yes, I doubt any re pro bod would ever go to such trouble.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.