|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Some for review
My concerns are 10,11,16 especially 16 seems to lack detail on back and has some sort of covering? I see these were copied a lot.
thanks |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
They ALL look fake to me.
regards
__________________
Simon Butterworth Manchester Regiment Collector Rank, Prize & Trade Badges British & Commonwealth Artillery Badges |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Robbo,
Without sounding to much like a stuck record, could you post a close up of No. 16? Have a look at the badges in this post http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...7&postcount=20 Yours would appear to be one of these "fat cats". Either way, a close up would confirm. Andy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The Ed V111 badge on back looks lacquered or sumit. It defo looks dodgy |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Your Edward VIII RE badge should be die cast, gilt and on blades instead of loops. And of a finish and detail worthy of an officers badge. Almost all officers badges are converted from George V badges with the new cypher soldered in position.
Rgds, Thomas. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Ok so the ED badge is a dud.
What about this fat cat badge I'm confused of why its a dud? |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I always prefer the Leicester thin cat with an unpierced tail for this economy badge. There may have been more than one maker but this one is the type of personal preference.
http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...leicestershire |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Doubly don't like it then
|
|
|