Manchester....!

[manchesters]

AGREED!!!!

[Frank Kelley]

When you say, should be "removed" could you clarify exactly?

Originally Posted by GTB

Perpetrators of repellent crimes against innocents and children just don't deserve to exist among us. Such lowlife should be removed. Security services shouldn't be hindered in investigating potential lowlife and if successfully identifying and thereby pre-empting atrocities this would be justification enough for hurting the feelings of those investigated and cleared.
Also, as I see it, we in the democratic West with our racial and religious tolerance, our human rights, our welfare system, asylum procedures, and so on and so forth, are looked upon by these vermin as weak and as easy pickings. They have no compunction to brainwash their own kin to blow themselves up, or even be so-called martyrs themselves, so how can they ever feel remorse for murdering innocents?

GTB

[GTB]

Originally Posted by Frank Kelley

When you say, should be "removed" could you clarify exactly?

Removed:

Legislation should be enacted to re-introduce the death penalty for these heinous crimes. Otherwise, if and when found guilty, perpetrators to be incarcerated, locked away for life and the key thrown away. Either way, they will be permanently removed from among us and we can get back to try and live a normal life.

GTB

[Frank Kelley]

Okay, I just wanted to understand what you meant in your original post because, in addition to the word, removed, you also mentioned, potential and pre empting, which suggested to me, at least, that you were, perhaps going down the internment route.
It is a very significant problem and very clearly needs to be discussed, not by us, but the government needs look into these issues very urgently indeed, before matters escalate further.