|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
WW 1 56th Division
Is this the correct formation sign for the 56th Division?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
56 Division
Yes - a "short sword" colloquially referred to at the time as "Wat Tyler's Dagger" - the weapon forms part of the Armorial Bearings of the City of London and the design was selected by the GOC, Maj Gen Sir Charles Hull.
(Divisional and Other Signs, by Capt V Wheeler-Holohan, 12th London Regt, 1920) The same weapon reappeared in WW2 and was worn by 56 Inf Div Signals. Mike |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
56th London Division
http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46258 http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46256 http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46257 Tim
__________________
"Manui dat cognitio vires - Knowledge gives strength to the arm" "Better to know it but not need it than to need it and not know it!" "Have more than thou showest, speak less than thou knowest." |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Mike is of course quite correct in saying the short sword of 56 Division was known as 'Wat Tyler's Dagger', and attributed to the armorial bearings of the City of London, and I am sorry to be pedantic about it, but truth is the sword depicted in the City of London arms is the Sword of St Paul, and not Wat Tyler's dagger.
From memory, the Wat Tyler dagger was (and probably still is) kept at Fishmongers Hall, London, and looks nothing like that of 56 Div emblem. I suggest the emblem adopted by 56 Div was a depiction of the short Roman sword to commemorate the Roman past of the City of London. The idea of the 56 Div sign being Wat Tylers dagger and all same City of London armorial bearings was probably dreamed up by an imaginative journalist, but it stuck, and will probably be so referred to for ever more. Regards, John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning Last edited by johnG; 03-04-14 at 07:07 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You are quite right, but as I said, it was a colloquial reference to what the soldiers called the weapon and was recorded as such in 1920 - when memories were still fresh. The colloquialism lived on through to the 1940s and 56 Inf Div Signals. Here's a 1917 dated reference with outstanding artwork: 56 Div WW1 1917.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
56 Signals
Quote:
Do you have a picture of the 56 Div. Signals that you could post? Thank you John |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you gentlemen for your educational responses.
Mike, if possible, I would also like to see a picture of the 56th Infantry Division Signals formation sign. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
56 Inf Div Signals.01.jpg |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Further to the above:
56 Inf Div Signals.02.jpg |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Mike,
Thank you very good pictures John |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In the 1950's I wore the armoured division version of the badge, with red sword superimposed on the black cat, and dress regulations were badges worn with the cats tails facing forwards. Perhaps the way of wearing the badge changed with the role of the division, or perhaps it was a regimental thing. Can anybody please explain. Thanks, John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Mike, perhaps with our tails up front we were the Inf Bn. HAC....well......just being the HAC..........
You mention the white with blue helmet badge, and oddly enough it is only early this morning I put in a bid for one on Ebay to fill a gap in my collection, to replace the one I gave away ten years ago, just before returning to England after a long absence and thinking I could easily replace it when I got here. Ten years later I have got round to doing something about it.. Edited much later to say I got lucky and won the item at a very low price. Regards, John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning Last edited by johnG; 12-04-14 at 03:36 AM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks Mike for posting photographs of the 56th Division Signals formation sign.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I recently purchased a Pattern 49 BD jacket with the post 1950 Black Cat with sword of the 56th Division, the tail goes to the rear. It is shown here:
The jacket is dated 1952 and it does seem a late usage of the P49 as the Queen's Regiment did not come into existence until December 31, 1966 if I am informed correctly. It is named (I prefer not to say to whom), but he was a member of D Company. Can anyone tell me if the Crown pierced by the arrows on the right sleeve is the flash of the Queen's Regiment? Thanks in advance for any information and corrections. |
|
|