British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-16, 11:39 AM
Postwarden's Avatar
Postwarden Postwarden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 3,234
Default Double Badged Gunner

Wearing blue patrols this Lance Sergeant - presumed to be Royal Artillery from his Layer trade badge - wears two skill-at-arms badges in the position specified for instructors' badges, that of a Layer surmounted by the LG of an LMG marksman. Is this correct or is the fact that they are worn on blue patrols a personal whim?

The Sam Browne type belt is also of interest and I have seen these worn in other photos. Do they have a particular significance?

Jon
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RA Lance Sgt two trade badges JM.jpg (23.7 KB, 154 views)
File Type: jpg RA Lance Sgt two trade badges detail JM.jpg (18.1 KB, 119 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-16, 01:14 PM
54Bty's Avatar
54Bty 54Bty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 6,300
Default

Just a thought: Possibly wearing the LG badge because he is a 'Limber Gunner', and to his mind L = Layer and LG = Limber Gunner, and no one told him any difference.

I have seen images of the Sgts shoulder strap and waist belt being worn in a Mountain Battery to carry the Sword.

Marc
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-10-17, 04:37 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,464
Default

First thought: is this a Walt?

Badges on right sleeve are either trade or appointment, and these badges make him a Layer [appointment] or Layer Instructor, and LG instructor [appointment]. Some doubts in my mind.
One rarely sees L badges on sergeants or lance-sergeants, and I find the idea of Lewis or LMGs on the battery unusual to say the least.

However, never say never ..............
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-10-17, 05:20 PM
Postwarden's Avatar
Postwarden Postwarden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 3,234
Default

Interesting comments. Could he be from a searchlight unit some of which were I believe issued with Lewis Guns for local defence?

Just thinking out loud.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-10-17, 11:39 AM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,464
Default

can the RA experts among us attempt to date this portrait please?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-10-17, 11:56 AM
MH331 MH331 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,200
Default

His waist belt is part of the 1903 pattern equipment worn well into WW2 and I think beyond to which he has added an officers sam browne cross strap. Not scientific but the picture has a late 1930s feel about it?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-10-17, 12:12 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,208
Default

I think 1930s too, the field service cap became popular again then. He should not be wearing both L and LG above rank, which makes me think he might be a Territorial. Searchlights does seem a possibility. I agree also that the belt is from 1903 bandolier equipment and has been highly polished for parade use. There was a cross belt (aka 'brace') made and issued for wear with pistols that had a sliding loop for fitting to the belt, as there were no brass rings to which it could be secured. Many units with mounted traditions permitted all their SNCOs to wear belts with such a brace in India, where they were widely issued from the Government factory for leather goods at Cawnpore. The distinctions of staff sergeants were much more fiercely guarded and retained there, than at home.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-10-17, 12:20 PM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,791
Default

The coloured FSC was revived in the late 1930s so it is likely to be at the end of the decade.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-10-17, 12:45 PM
manchesters's Avatar
manchesters manchesters is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 7,589
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby Purcell View Post
I think 1930s too, the field service cap became popular again then. He should not be wearing both L and LG above rank, which makes me think he might be a Territorial. Searchlights does seem a possibility. I agree also that the belt is from 1903 bandolier equipment and has been highly polished for parade use. There was a cross belt (aka 'brace') made and issued for wear with pistols that had a sliding loop for fitting to the belt, as there were no brass rings to which it could be secured. Many units with mounted traditions permitted all their SNCOs to wear belts with such a brace in India, where they were widely issued from the Government factory for leather goods at Cawnpore. The distinctions of staff sergeants were much more fiercely guarded and retained there, than at home.
He cant be a Territorial in the 1930's (pre War) AND be in India though.

reagrds
__________________
Simon Butterworth

Manchester Regiment Collector
Rank, Prize & Trade Badges
British & Commonwealth Artillery Badges
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-10-17, 02:08 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by manchesters View Post
He cant be a Territorial in the 1930's (pre War) AND be in India though.

reagrds
I did not mean to imply that he was in India. They are just two lines of thought. The pistol supporting brace (often used by machine gunners) was occasionally seen on the home establishment, but less often than in India, where they were slower to adopt web equipment (partly because of large stocks of leather in store and its relative cheapness there). Nonetheless I believe the photo to be at ‘home’. I doubt very much that he is a regular.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-10-17, 03:05 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,464
Default

And of course he is not an SNCO as a lance-sergeant [no gun badge above chevrons].

Last edited by grumpy; 27-10-17 at 03:05 PM. Reason: incoherence
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.