British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Formation Signs and Patches

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-14, 03:42 AM
Desert Rat's Avatar
Desert Rat Desert Rat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 240
Default WW 1 56th Division

Is this the correct formation sign for the 56th Division?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCN0643m.JPG (61.8 KB, 106 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-14, 05:19 AM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default 56 Division

Yes - a "short sword" colloquially referred to at the time as "Wat Tyler's Dagger" - the weapon forms part of the Armorial Bearings of the City of London and the design was selected by the GOC, Maj Gen Sir Charles Hull.
(Divisional and Other Signs, by Capt V Wheeler-Holohan, 12th London Regt, 1920)
The same weapon reappeared in WW2 and was worn by 56 Inf Div Signals. Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-14, 06:15 AM
grey_green_acorn's Avatar
grey_green_acorn grey_green_acorn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 5,820
Default

56th London Division

http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46258

http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46256


http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ictureid=46257

Tim
__________________
"Manui dat cognitio vires - Knowledge gives strength to the arm"
"Better to know it but not need it than to need it and not know it!"
"Have more than thou showest, speak less than thou knowest."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-14, 06:55 AM
johnG's Avatar
johnG johnG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southampton, U.K.
Posts: 1,116
Default

Mike is of course quite correct in saying the short sword of 56 Division was known as 'Wat Tyler's Dagger', and attributed to the armorial bearings of the City of London, and I am sorry to be pedantic about it, but truth is the sword depicted in the City of London arms is the Sword of St Paul, and not Wat Tyler's dagger.

From memory, the Wat Tyler dagger was (and probably still is) kept at Fishmongers Hall, London, and looks nothing like that of 56 Div emblem.

I suggest the emblem adopted by 56 Div was a depiction of the short Roman sword to commemorate the Roman past of the City of London.

The idea of the 56 Div sign being Wat Tylers dagger and all same City of London armorial bearings was probably dreamed up by an imaginative journalist, but it stuck, and will probably be so referred to for ever more.

Regards,

John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning

Last edited by johnG; 03-04-14 at 07:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-14, 08:15 AM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnG View Post
Mike is of course quite correct in saying the short sword of 56 Division was known as 'Wat Tyler's Dagger', and attributed to the armorial bearings of the City of London, and I am sorry to be pedantic about it, but truth is the sword depicted in the City of London arms is the Sword of St Paul, and not Wat Tyler's dagger.

From memory, the Wat Tyler dagger was (and probably still is) kept at Fishmongers Hall, London, and looks nothing like that of 56 Div emblem.

I suggest the emblem adopted by 56 Div was a depiction of the short Roman sword to commemorate the Roman past of the City of London.

The idea of the 56 Div sign being Wat Tylers dagger and all same City of London armorial bearings was probably dreamed up by an imaginative journalist, but it stuck, and will probably be so referred to for ever more.

Regards,

John
John,

You are quite right, but as I said, it was a colloquial reference to what the soldiers called the weapon and was recorded as such in 1920 - when memories were still fresh. The colloquialism lived on through to the 1940s and 56 Inf Div Signals. Here's a 1917 dated reference with outstanding artwork:
56 Div WW1 1917.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-04-14, 11:49 PM
John L John L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 481
Default 56 Signals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jackson View Post
Yes - a "short sword" colloquially referred to at the time as "Wat Tyler's Dagger" - the weapon forms part of the Armorial Bearings of the City of London and the design was selected by the GOC, Maj Gen Sir Charles Hull.
(Divisional and Other Signs, by Capt V Wheeler-Holohan, 12th London Regt, 1920)
The same weapon reappeared in WW2 and was worn by 56 Inf Div Signals. Mike
Mike ,
Do you have a picture of the 56 Div. Signals that you could post?

Thank you
John
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-14, 12:30 AM
Desert Rat's Avatar
Desert Rat Desert Rat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 240
Default

Thank you gentlemen for your educational responses.

Mike, if possible, I would also like to see a picture of the 56th Infantry Division Signals formation sign.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-14, 07:30 AM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John L View Post
Mike ,
Do you have a picture of the 56 Div. Signals that you could post?

Thank you
John
Herewith. There's also an image in the Imperial War Museum collection showing three soldiers wearing the flash sitting on the banks of the River Arno (?) fishing! If I can find it, I'll post that too. In the meantime:
56 Inf Div Signals.01.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-14, 08:28 AM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Further to the above:
56 Inf Div Signals.02.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-14, 11:48 PM
John L John L is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 481
Default

Mike,

Thank you very good pictures

John
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-04-14, 04:30 AM
johnG's Avatar
johnG johnG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southampton, U.K.
Posts: 1,116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Jackson View Post
Further to the above:
Attachment 103271
I note in this photograph the cats tails are facing to the rear and the divisional sign does not have a sword superimposed on it, i.e. the infantry version.

In the 1950's I wore the armoured division version of the badge, with red sword superimposed on the black cat, and dress regulations were badges worn with the cats tails facing forwards.

Perhaps the way of wearing the badge changed with the role of the division, or perhaps it was a regimental thing. Can anybody please explain.

Thanks,

John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-04-14, 05:36 AM
Mike Jackson's Avatar
Mike Jackson Mike Jackson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,329
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnG View Post
I note in this photograph the cats tails are facing to the rear and the divisional sign does not have a sword superimposed on it, i.e. the infantry version.

In the 1950's I wore the armoured division version of the badge, with red sword superimposed on the black cat, and dress regulations were badges worn with the cats tails facing forwards.

Perhaps the way of wearing the badge changed with the role of the division, or perhaps it was a regimental thing. Can anybody please explain.

Thanks,

John
The sword was only introduced into the design of the 56th Division sign in Jan 48 with the entirely new sign for 56 (London) Armd Div (TA) - a blue knight's helmet on red sword on white rectangle. This was replaced in 1950 by the familiar black cat - Dick Whittington's of course - with red sword superimposed. I do not know whether the definitive WW2 black cat was "tail left" or "tail right" - and I don't think that the Division was obsessive about facing pairs. FM Sir Gerald Templer when commanding the Division in Italy was concerned that some of the cats were getting too fat and instructed that future production should feature a slimmer beast. Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-04-14, 06:00 AM
johnG's Avatar
johnG johnG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southampton, U.K.
Posts: 1,116
Default

Thanks Mike, perhaps with our tails up front we were the Inf Bn. HAC....well......just being the HAC..........

You mention the white with blue helmet badge, and oddly enough it is only early this morning I put in a bid for one on Ebay to fill a gap in my collection, to replace the one I gave away ten years ago, just before returning to England after a long absence and thinking I could easily replace it when I got here. Ten years later I have got round to doing something about it..

Edited much later to say I got lucky and won the item at a very low price.
Regards,

John
__________________
Keep the flame lily burning

Last edited by johnG; 12-04-14 at 03:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-04-14, 02:24 AM
Desert Rat's Avatar
Desert Rat Desert Rat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 240
Default

Thanks Mike for posting photographs of the 56th Division Signals formation sign.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-04-14, 05:53 PM
gew8805 gew8805 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 6
Default

I recently purchased a Pattern 49 BD jacket with the post 1950 Black Cat with sword of the 56th Division, the tail goes to the rear. It is shown here:







The jacket is dated 1952 and it does seem a late usage of the P49 as the Queen's Regiment did not come into existence until December 31, 1966 if I am informed correctly. It is named (I prefer not to say to whom), but he was a member of D Company.

Can anyone tell me if the Crown pierced by the arrows on the right sleeve is the flash of the Queen's Regiment?

Thanks in advance for any information and corrections.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.