 |
Recent Books by Forum Members |
 |
|
|
|
#1
01-04-18, 02:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
WTF
What on earth has a Pzkw IV got to do with the Wall Street Journal? Are those in a advertising business too clever for their own good? Mike
Wall Street Journal_GE Mk IV Tank.jpg 
|
|
#2
01-04-18, 04:25 PM
|
||||
|
||||
WTF
Mike,
Good to see you back and posting . . ! Rob PS. Advertising agencies have a lot to answer for.
|
|
#3
01-04-18, 05:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm sure to most members of the general public (many graphic designers included) the tank depicted would not immediately register as 'Panzer'. I would say that most would simply see a generic tank.
The silhouetted Twitter logos issuing from it obviously being a visual interpretation of hostile 'tweets' being fired across a social media 'battlefield'. I shouldn't think the type of tank used was consciously chosen because it was a Panzer IV. So by way of agreement with you, Mike, I would have to say you are absolutely correct; it does indeed appear to have nothing to do with the WSJ, hence the reason (I assume) they ran it. Nicely ID'd by the way  JT Last edited by Jelly Terror; 01-04-18 at 05:31 PM.
|
|
#5
30-04-18, 07:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hilarious - for some reason it reminds me of Shepherd Neames better offering (the beer mat, not the beer).
|
|
#6
30-04-18, 07:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
30-04-18, 07:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
|
|
#8
30-04-18, 07:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sorry, you said bitter? No nasty aftertaste
|
|
#10
30-04-18, 07:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes, a brilliant range of ads, but they didn't find favour with some.
|
|
#12
30-04-18, 07:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Absolutely, just some don't appreciate it.......
|
 |
|
|
 |
Linear Mode
