British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Common Forums > Reproductions, Restrikes, Fakes, Forgeries, and Copies

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22-01-11, 10:43 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,646
Default Don't be Scared to send it back!!

To all the newer collectors on the Forum I would offer this advice! If you are not happy with whatever a seller sends you then send it back! Just because you bought an item from a reputable source does not mean that you should be affraid to question the authenticity! I bought a Victorian Royal Irish Rifles Glengarry badge (KK 689) from a prominent dealer, on receipt I was less than happy with the "Thing" that dropped onto my doormat. I requested a refund and was told that the badge was 100% genuine and was purchase from Hugh King, even though it looked more like something from Burger King!

£100 pounds for a repro is OTT in my opinion, see below images of two badges, the blackened badge with the rust on the back (Gilding Metal does not rust!!) was the one sent to me by the dealer and returned in protest and at a financial loss to me, the other badge is a 100% genuine badge procured from one of the newer sellers/dealers (Endici) who are increasingly providing an outstanding service.

K&K does not help that much because some of it's black and white images do not provide a great deal of definition, although the books themselves are a fantastic reference.

Look at the two badges, although one has lost it's orginal black finish remnants can be seen between the detail of the lettering etc. Look at the scrolling to the Maidens legs, the jewels to the headband of the crown and the overall depth of a genuine badge.

Although polished this IMO is a 100% GENUINE badge.

The point of my message is, this Forum is a fantastic site for collectors, do not be bullied by established outlets, get a second opinion and don't be affraid to question a dubious item!

Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RIR.jpg (34.1 KB, 411 views)
File Type: jpg RIR vic -1-[1].jpg (57.9 KB, 392 views)
File Type: jpg 79EB029955374D6995CAE39C34374432.jpg (48.0 KB, 394 views)
File Type: jpg 7EDC4473049748C786B41C9A51AD57BE.jpg (37.0 KB, 338 views)

Last edited by 2747andy; 09-10-15 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-01-11, 03:56 AM
freya 1940 freya 1940 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Default

Hi, I know I'm relatively new to the forum but having had a close look at the badges you put on there as repro & original, I like the blackened gilded metal one; the patina looks OK to me & the blackening on the back will go that colour with age. It's not rust. I would definitely have that one in preference to the one that's had all the blackening removed or was never there in the first place. I think that it's down to individual opinions of what is re-strike or original. I have been collecting over 35 yrs & dealt with all the top dealers in my time & I think I have a good working knowledge of badges.
The upshot of all this is, what one person says is reproduction another person may say is real.
Freya 1940

Mod comment - Please note that this member is the seller of the badge in post one so has avested interest and his opinion is not impartial.

Last edited by Alan O; 16-01-15 at 09:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-01-11, 06:00 AM
raesherwood raesherwood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 53
Default

If you straighten up the second picture, then the lugs appear to be 'fixed' at least 10 degrees to the horizontal; outside of manufacturing tolerance to my mind.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 23-01-11, 10:19 AM
Alan O's Avatar
Alan O Alan O is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,795
Default

Or what you see is where one has bent slightly up and one slightly down of course.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23-01-11, 10:41 AM
andyl andyl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 32
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raesherwood View Post
If you straighten up the second picture, then the lugs appear to be 'fixed' at least 10 degrees to the horizontal; outside of manufacturing tolerance to my mind.
Both badges appear to have a higher left lug and the right is lower, perhaps as Alan says, due to them being bent ???
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-01-11, 10:44 AM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by freya 1940 View Post
Hi, I know I'm relatively new to the forum but having had a close look at the badges you put on there as repro & original, I like the blackened gilded metal one; the patina looks OK to me & the blackening on the back will go that colour with age. It's not rust. I would definitely have that one in preference to the one that's had all the blackening removed or was never there in the first place. I think that it's down to individual opinions of what is re-strike or original. I have been collecting over 35 yrs & dealt with all the top dealers in my time & I think I have a good working knowledge of badges.
The upshot of all this is, what one person says is reproduction another person may say is real.
Freya 1940
Freya,
thank you for your valued reply! The first badge is definately a reproduction and the "Rust" to the rear although not real rust has been applied to the rear of the badge to give the effect of age, a quick rub with a cotton bud showed that it had not been there very long. What cannot be shown in a photograph is weight, however the badge you like is lightweight and "Tinny" whereas the other is solid and well struck, as you would expect an item from the Victorian era to be!

As to "what one person says is reproduction another person may say is real".

I have been fortunate to have been able examine both badges, I do not want to sound a Big Head, but when I give my opinion that an item is reproduction I am usually "Spot On" as, in my honest opinion I am in this case! Anyone wishing to sell such a badge for £100 is obviously going to say it is real, it is just a matter of who believes them!

Thank you once again.

Andy

Last edited by 2747andy; 27-07-15 at 07:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23-01-11, 12:00 PM
Traist's Avatar
Traist Traist is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rustenburg, South Africa
Posts: 1,640
Default Send it back

Hi Andy, I think it is very good to return the fakes to the seller. It is one way to help this thing stop. If they get the stuff returned to them all the time and everybody demands there money back, it will hurt them. I recently returned a packet of badges to a seller who swore high and low that they were original, but they were not. He did eventually pay me back my money including postage. I believe he does not have a good reputation for dealing in originals. But, even "good" dealers make mistakes. By returning the bad items, even these guys will be more careful when buying in collections. They will weed out the fakes. Have a grand day and may this be a year where fakes are stopped. Regards Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23-01-11, 12:04 PM
matti467's Avatar
matti467 matti467 is offline
Mr. Jackanory
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 1,853
Default

It is the face that is a give away. It looks like a bloke on the first one. I always look carefully at faces, badges such as the Norfolks have some really nasty crones on the restrikes.
At the end on the day, if you are not satisfied, it goes back.
Matti
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-01-11, 08:16 PM
Keith Blakeman's Avatar
Keith Blakeman Keith Blakeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Staring into space, just wishing I had a desk.
Posts: 2,956
Default

I am with Andy on this one. The fake RIR glengarries have been around for years and years, I think it's in one edition of Wilkinson witht he price guide states 'if genuine' or something like that. For that reason it's a badge I would be happy to pay decent money for from a trusted dealer and that hasn't happened here.

The new 'good' one has at least come via a third party from Bosleys so there is insurance that is genuine although as we are seeing issues raised on here that they make mistakes from time to time - maybe not so much on fake v genuine matters but more so on non-authorised examples. I've never had a bad badge from them.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-01-11, 08:42 PM
paj1 paj1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 762
Default

if you think about how many badges dealers and auction houses turn over
every year you are bound to get some restrike - fake badges that manage
to slip through the net. however if you have paid good money for a badge
that turns out to be a fake - restrike , then yes send it back for a refund
you are within your rights to do this
paj1
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-01-11, 09:08 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,373
Default

I think a distinction needs to be made between sales at auction and other sales especially those where a money back guarantee is offered.

In bidding at an auction you are entering into a contract on the fall of the hammer and as has already been mentioned before, returning auction items will be subject to terms and conditions you are deemed to have accepted in making your bid even if you have not read the small print in the catalogue or the small print which is usually on a sign displayed in the auction room.

Not for nothing does the term Caveat Emptor apply !!!!

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-01-11, 09:09 PM
hagwalther's Avatar
hagwalther hagwalther is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,939
Default

Hi Guys,

I'd go one further with all this.

If you are unsatisfied with what you have bought for any reason whatsoever then you should send it back - simple as that really.

Regards

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-01-11, 09:42 PM
hagwalther's Avatar
hagwalther hagwalther is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8thfoot View Post
I think a distinction needs to be made between sales at auction and other sales especially those where a money back guarantee is offered.

In bidding at an auction you are entering into a contract on the fall of the hammer and as has already been mentioned before, returning auction items will be subject to terms and conditions you are deemed to have accepted in making your bid even if you have not read the small print in the catalogue or the small print which is usually on a sign displayed in the auction room.

Not for nothing does the term Caveat Emptor apply !!!!

P.B.
Hi 8thFoot,

Depends if the auction house describes the lot being sold correctly - if they do not and say sell a cast zink 5th/6th Territorial Battalion, The Staffordshire Regiment as an anodised item then I would expect a full refund including all postage and fees.

Regards

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 24-01-11, 10:09 AM
paj1 paj1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 762
Default

Its going to be a bit of a gamble if you are bidding on items that you only
see a picture of in a catalogue and then maybe only a front view of badge
paj1
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 24-01-11, 10:01 PM
2747andy 2747andy is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Porthcawl, South Wales
Posts: 7,646
Default

Back to the original post, here are some better images of the badge in question. I have had the fortunate position of being able to handle both and this one is IMO, 100% Genuine, the other, which was "Returned to Sender" was nowhere near this quality. My dilema now is do I take up Dave the MBA's offer to return it to it's original black finish or leave it as it is, it would be a shame to cover such a fantastic patina.. Hey Ho.. I now have a genuine example so I may just leave her as she is, she appears to have been in this undressed state for some time, perhaps "deblackened" by the original wearer over 108 years ago?

Andy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSCF9544.jpg (98.0 KB, 191 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF9546.jpg (51.9 KB, 146 views)
File Type: jpg DSCF9547.jpg (98.1 KB, 147 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.