British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > General Topics.

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 04-05-17, 05:46 PM
Peter Brydon's Avatar
Peter Brydon Peter Brydon is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Chester
Posts: 10,367
Default

Sadly I think that in most areas of life today ,even those organisations whose prime objective is NOT to make a profit, are run using the latest business models ( and not doubt their management teams employ the latest management speak ) so any opportunity to recoup some income, no matter what that might involve ( selling the family silver ? ) will be seized with both hands.

P.B.
__________________
Interested in all aspects of militaria/military history but especially insignia and history of non regular units with a Liverpool connection

Members welcome in my private Facebook group “The Kings Liverpool Regiment ( 1685-1958 )”
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 04-05-17, 07:00 PM
fougasse1940's Avatar
fougasse1940 fougasse1940 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btns View Post
The NAM: careless destructors of british history
John 11:35

Thomas.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 04-05-17, 07:27 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hello Mike,
Yes, I think there are quite a number of people with similar views now, a great shame, never mind, visits are not compulsory.
Regards Frank

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike c View Post
I to like you frank spent many interesting and enjoyable hours in both museums but alas now both have gone Down hill they are ok for people to look round on a rainy day but for collectors and people genuinely interested in military matters not very good in my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 04-05-17, 07:28 PM
btns's Avatar
btns btns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grenadierguardsman View Post
I don't know what your on about, i was referring to the reply from the National Army Museum.
Andy
My apologies. I assumed you were referring to my posting.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-05-17, 06:50 PM
grenadierguardsman's Avatar
grenadierguardsman grenadierguardsman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btns View Post
My apologies. I assumed you were referring to my posting.
No problem.
Andy
__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 23-10-17, 03:36 PM
grenadierguardsman's Avatar
grenadierguardsman grenadierguardsman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,908
Angry

Been back to the National Army Museum today, they are showing two badges as being to the Grenadier Guards. Both are wrong, they are even showing the wrong Motto. As I have already mentioned, I told them in January about these mistakes. It seems as though they definitely couldn’t give a toss.
Andy
__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 23-10-17, 07:27 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,207
Default

Sorry to hear that Andy, but sadly not at all surprised.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 23-10-17, 10:09 PM
Staffsyeoman Staffsyeoman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,129
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grenadierguardsman View Post
Been back to the National Army Museum today, they are showing two badges as being to the Grenadier Guards. Both are wrong, they are even showing the wrong Motto. As I have already mentioned, I told them in January about these mistakes. It seems as though they definitely couldn’t give a toss.
Andy
There is a reason for that. They don't.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 24-10-17, 02:54 AM
kingsley kingsley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,022
Default "If you have tears, prepare to shed them now"

Unbelievable, but true. The AWM used to have a director who was obsessed with models rather than artifacts. Of course, limited space and limited funds but conservation should be RULE NUMBER 1.
Not sure exactly when, but:
1. Their original complete German trophy railway gun was too big and a coat of paint was too hard: the solution was to scrap it and just keep the barrel you see today.
2. No room for orginal WW1 aircraft, a model would do. Solution, burn them!!!
3. Their incredible collection of Pickelhauben which I used to admire in the 1960s were put in storage for a display change. There they got wet and were reduced to soggy pulp.
Maybe the IWM is not so bad after all.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 24-10-17, 08:35 AM
fairlie63's Avatar
fairlie63 fairlie63 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Claremont, Tasmania
Posts: 1,368
Default

Regarding the railway gun, the mounting was moved to the Proof and Experimental Establishment at Port Wakefield, South Australia, during the Second World War for proof of relined 8-inch naval guns. Barrel was left in Canberra, railway bogies got left at Wodonga.

When the mounting was no longer needed the AWM decided it was too costly to return to Canberra so it was scrapped in situ!

We'd probably cry if we knew the true story of what had been sold, stolen, or scrapped at the AWM.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 25-10-17, 05:53 PM
grenadierguardsman's Avatar
grenadierguardsman grenadierguardsman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,908
Default

According to the National Army Museum this is a cap badge to the Grenadier Guards, donated by Major Parkyn in about 1970. It is for me to prove that it is not ?!

__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 25-10-17, 07:19 PM
grenadierguardsman's Avatar
grenadierguardsman grenadierguardsman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,908
Default

According to the National Army Museum this is a cap badge to the Grenadier Guards, donated by Major Parkyn in about 1970 ?! I have to prove that it is not !
Andy
__________________
Leave to carry on Sir please.

Last edited by grenadierguardsman; 25-10-17 at 07:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 25-10-17, 07:37 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,116
Default

Tell 'em to check some basic badge books?
Ask them what documentation Parkyn supplied identifying the badges as GG?
Sounds like it's a case of "it's a grenade with nothing on the ball so it's got to be Grenadier Guards"..
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 25-10-17, 11:26 PM
David Tremain's Avatar
David Tremain David Tremain is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,903
Default

It looks more like one I have which was actually an artillery regiment, c.1890s:

Fifeshire Artillery Volunteers, forage cap (pre-1902), general pattern, WM, as for Grenadier Guards (KK838)

David
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 25-10-17, 11:33 PM
leigh kitchen's Avatar
leigh kitchen leigh kitchen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 9,116
Default

Yep, & of course RMA for the second, as shown in basic badge refs. K&K & Gaylor.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.