British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Formation Signs and Patches

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-02-09, 11:00 AM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default 93rd Anti Tank Regiment, 1st Division

Recently bought an epaulette slip on with the insignia of the 1st Infantry artillery, 93rd Anti Tank regiment (Bth battalion, Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders) that has fought in the BEF and then in Tunisia, Sicily and Italy. What's your opinion? It is a quite known formation insignia combination, and there's always the chance that somebody having read the Osprey book on British Formation insignia could have decided to put together a whole slip on... by the way, is there any specific reason why you can find so many 1st Division Artillery printed patches on ebay?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Argyll_Anti_Tank.jpg (76.3 KB, 35 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-02-09, 04:52 PM
cymro's Avatar
cymro cymro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At home!
Posts: 224
Default

Hello there,

I collect formation signs to the Italian campaign, and of course, most of these are in the form of slip-ons and combinations. I've had a look at the scan and although it's hard to say without it being in one's hand, I think it looks ok.

You're right though, this particular combination is vulnerable to being 'made up' as both the constituent parts are not that hard to come by. 1st division was a real law unto itself when it came to signs and there are weird and wonderful variations. I shall take a scan of my examples to the division and post in due course.

Proper slides of course took a bit of a battering when worn on such a well-used part of the body (in term of load bearing), which is why the looped, drop-down ones were increasingly adopted. I've got pics of these in use by 1 Div.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-02-09, 05:50 PM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cymro View Post
Hello there,

I collect formation signs to the Italian campaign, and of course, most of these are in the form of slip-ons and combinations. I've had a look at the scan and although it's hard to say without it being in one's hand, I think it looks ok.

You're right though, this particular combination is vulnerable to being 'made up' as both the constituent parts are not that hard to come by. 1st division was a real law unto itself when it came to signs and there are weird and wonderful variations. I shall take a scan of my examples to the division and post in due course.

Proper slides of course took a bit of a battering when worn on such a well-used part of the body (in term of load bearing), which is why the looped, drop-down ones were increasingly adopted. I've got pics of these in use by 1 Div.
will be looking forward to see your scans, than, and very much so!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-02-09, 08:37 PM
cymro's Avatar
cymro cymro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At home!
Posts: 224
Default

Hi there - here is a pic of some of the 1st Div signs as promised - I believe the maroon circle is mobile ambulance RAMC, but the black square remains a mystery, despite an enquiry in a recent copy of 'The Formation Sign'...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2312.jpg (40.6 KB, 71 views)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-02-09, 08:39 PM
cymro's Avatar
cymro cymro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At home!
Posts: 224
Default

One more...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2313.jpg (41.1 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-02-09, 05:03 AM
lettman lettman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,071
Default

Lovely signs, Cymro! When was the red border around the triangle adopted?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-02-09, 04:38 PM
cymro's Avatar
cymro cymro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At home!
Posts: 224
Default

My best guess would be 1944 sometime, although I'm very happy to be proved wrong by someone who knows the definitive answer!

Anyone?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-02-09, 07:42 PM
Voltigeur's Avatar
Voltigeur Voltigeur is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal,Canada.
Posts: 5,778
Default

Gentlemen,if may intrude on the subject. Two photographs taken in 1947-48 in Tel-Aviv and showing members of the HLI with, on the uniform,the 1st Div sign.
Jo
http://images.google.com/hosted/life...b09995183dc31d

http://images.google.com/hosted/life...a7702dbd38a46b
__________________
"There truly exists but one perfect order: that of cemeteries. The dead never complain and they enjoy their equality in silence." -

“There are things we know that we know,” “There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know.”
Donald Rumsfeld, before the Iraqi Invasion,2003.

Age is something that doesn't matter, unless you are a cheese.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-02-09, 09:28 PM
cymro's Avatar
cymro cymro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At home!
Posts: 224
Default

Great pics Jo - thanks...

I was aware that the 1st Division carried on with at least the white triangle after the war. As the arm-of-service stripes disappeared at the end of the war and the units in the division changed, one can generally identify the wartime pieces. Interestingly, the 1st seemd to have had Bevo Weave combination signs that incorporated arm-of-service stripes made up during the war - see the 2nd N. Staffs, 2nd Inf Brigade in my scan.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-02-09, 10:14 PM
lettman lettman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,071
Default

My 3rd edition of Cole's Badges on Battledress (1953) shows the red border, while my 2nd edn of his Heraldry in War (1947) doesn't, so it was sometime between the two. I was just hoping someone knew exactly when it came in.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-06-09, 01:08 PM
erracht's Avatar
erracht erracht is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Frankfort, KY USA
Posts: 126
Default

Back on the 93 A/T Regt slip-on, the troubling thing for me is that the A&SH flash is placed upside down - the red ends should be to the top...

Dean
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.