British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Royal Navy and Royal Marines

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-01-14, 10:59 AM
Paddy's Avatar
Paddy Paddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portsmouth Area
Posts: 1,057
Default Royal Naval Division Machine Gun Battalion

Good Morning All

I know these badges have been a subject of hot debate and until now I've passed up on quite a few and got caught out on a couple of one piece versions in my early days. I've now just picked up the one pictured below, it came with a genuine MGC cap badge and pair of shoulder titles and there was no hard sell on the RND bit. As these badges were purportedly put together in field workshops this is the type of construction I have always considered to be expected under those conditions. I believe both parts are genuine, the stumps of the hexagonal lugs are still visible and the solder is old and dull (not as shiny as it looks in the picture). The badge has an even polish across the front and the polish residue is in all the nooks and crannies and doesn't look false or recent. As usual people are going to have differing views so I'm opening it up to see those views.

As usual, many thanks in advance

Paddy
Attached Images
File Type: jpg The Royal Naval Division Machine Gun Battalion (KC)(GM)(Rear).jpg (77.5 KB, 205 views)
File Type: jpg The Royal Naval Division Machine Gun Battalion (KC)(GM).jpg (86.8 KB, 191 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN1597.jpg (88.7 KB, 104 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN1587.jpg (65.3 KB, 87 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN1568.jpg (78.9 KB, 77 views)
File Type: jpg DSCN1566.jpg (76.6 KB, 116 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-01-14, 01:13 PM
royston royston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cotswolds
Posts: 409
Default

Hi Paddy

Well done. Looks good.

John
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-01-14, 01:41 PM
gb64's Avatar
gb64 gb64 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,347
Default

Hello Paddy,looks a good one to me also,if I was lucky enough to find one i would be happy with I would want it to have the look of your badge like you had a couple that weren't quite right so will carry on the search. Gerard
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-01-14, 09:36 PM
Paddy's Avatar
Paddy Paddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Portsmouth Area
Posts: 1,057
Default

John & Gerard

Many thanks for your comments, I'm certainly a lot happier with it than a lot of others I've seen.

Paddy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-01-14, 08:06 PM
Jim Maclean Jim Maclean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 231
Default

OK, I'll throw the spanner in.

The composite badge was made from an MGC cap badge and an RND shoulder title as this one appears to be. If this was the composition they came up with then I cannot imagine it being soft(lead) soldered and to such an extremely poor finish. That badge was done as a one off, I cannot imagine anyone in the workshops that these badges were puportedley made, soldering a couple of bits of metal together in such a sloppy way. There's enough solder on that on to do a 100 badges.

I believe the original to have had the RND title brazed to the front of the MGC badge not with a reinforcing link.

A good starting point would be looking at known original RND MG badges and looking for variations in the gun, and seeing what the date of this particular version is.

Unfortunately I think this is a cobbled together attempt from genuine items neither of which now have much value.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-01-14, 08:23 PM
Tinto's Avatar
Tinto Tinto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gisborne, New Zealand
Posts: 3,079
Default

Hi Paddy and all,
Like Jim I also have my doubts about your composite badge in the first post.
I think I have shown mine before but here they are again for comparison. Note the Gaunt plaque on each. The plaque on a MGC badge has also been discussed before and was not usual.
Cheers, Tinto
Attached Images
File Type: jpg RND MG obv.jpg (39.4 KB, 179 views)
File Type: jpg RND MG rev.jpg (39.5 KB, 203 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28-01-14, 04:56 PM
Bill Bill is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 164
Default

Is there any contemprary photographic evidence of any man in uniform wearing this badge? Cheers, Bill
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28-01-14, 05:04 PM
Nozzer Nozzer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,634
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill View Post
Is there any contemprary photographic evidence of any man in uniform wearing this badge? Cheers, Bill
http://www.britishbadgeforum.com/for...ad.php?t=27087
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-01-14, 08:02 PM
Tinto's Avatar
Tinto Tinto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Gisborne, New Zealand
Posts: 3,079
Default

Hello Paddy,
I think you have summed up the situation very well. We will probably never know the full story of these badges.
Cheers, Tinto
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-01-14, 04:17 PM
TRT's Avatar
TRT TRT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 325
Default

I agree with Paddy. Tintos badges are in my opinion modern copies for alll the reasons stated. The s/t part is stamped and not a s/t. There are no lug marks as one would expect to see. I bought one many years ago and as illustrated very similar to Paddys. I was very excited to see another so similar. It is exactly what I would expect, rough amatuerish soldering, s/t utilised with lug scars. Made in the field in limited numbers. Any example such as Tintos appears often in huge numbers at odds with what we suposedly know.

Here are images of mine. Bought over 10 / 12 years ago. Allegedly removed from a display in a Naval club where it had resided for years (buy the badge not the story though).

Mine was used in a book recently as a example of a good one, the late forum member Dragonz really rated it too.

I am happy with mine and would be with Paddys. This is only the second example I have ever seen similar to mie....good find. If made as a copy more would exist.

TRT
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2008_0712Collection0053 (Small).JPG (38.0 KB, 173 views)
File Type: jpg 2008_0712Collection0052 (Small).JPG (39.5 KB, 138 views)

Last edited by TRT; 29-01-14 at 04:19 PM. Reason: additional omments
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-01-14, 08:21 PM
Jim Maclean Jim Maclean is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 231
Default

Paddy, thanks for taking my view in the spirit that it was meant.

We always say "never say never" so I have to keep playing Devil's Advocate on this one.

My greatest problem with this is not whether either piece is genuine, most likely they are. My big problem is the soft solder and the amount of it, a totally amateur job poorly executed.

Where were they made? In the field? Of course not, there weren't people in the trenches joining two badges together so the RN Machine gunners could go and fight!?

Having not really ever pursued this one before I have vague recollections of statements claiming these badges were made in Devonport Dockyard. If this is the case then there is even less argument for soft solder.

I don't have a horse in this race so all opinions and findings are interesting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.