British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Everything Else > Other Military Topics

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-05-17, 11:35 PM
soldier1 soldier1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ste Julie QC Canada
Posts: 110
Default Sword Research

Good evening members;

I hope some of you can help me in the researching of a sword that I'm involved in as fols;

A long time friend of mine (Ex RCOC/Loggie); 50 years and counting) has asked the museum if we can find out some info on a sword that has been in his family for a few generations. First a little history;

In New Brunswick after the revolution and expulsion of the Acadians in the 18th century, the British army deployed mounted patrols throughout the area.These patrols would frequently seek shelter in various farms they came across. The policy was that these patrols would pay farmers for the use of their property.
One of my friends ancestors was requested to harbour such a patrol. When the patrol left, the officer, Lieut R Luard, did not have any money and offered to leave his sword as a guarantee that he would return with the money.

He never did return and the sword has been handed down from father to son ever since.

The basket of the sword has a crest in it that I believe is the Royal Cypher of George 1V (King 1820-1830);

On the blade is the inscription; Lieut
R, LUARD
Royal Artillery
1823

The scabbard of leather and metal is in poor condition.

Can anyone confirm the crest is in fact the Royal Cypher?

Would the date on the blade be the year of manufacture or the year of commissioning of Lt LUARD?

Could a kind member point me in the direction of trying to find out the history of LT LUARD Royal Artillery?

I have pictures that I will ask our good friend Bill Alexander to post for me as I have no photo account.

Any comments, observations or leads to further info would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers Al
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-05-17, 12:01 AM
Bill A's Avatar
Bill A Bill A is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 11,529
Default

Images for Alan's post above.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg P1000314.jpg (63.6 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg P1000315.jpg (65.3 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg P1000316.jpg (60.8 KB, 41 views)
File Type: jpg P1000317.jpg (61.7 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg P1000318.jpg (39.0 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg P1000321.jpg (36.8 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg P1000322.jpg (36.6 KB, 13 views)
__________________
Res ipsa loquitur
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-17, 07:32 AM
Cribyn's Avatar
Cribyn Cribyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales
Posts: 1,718
Default

Hello Al

Your cypher would certainly appear to be that of George IV.

I would suggest that the date on the blade relates to the officer, rather than the sword itself, so most probably you are correct, it is the date of his commission. It might possibly be the date of his entry into the Royal Artillery if he transferred from some other unit.

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-17, 07:46 AM
Kevin Elliott Kevin Elliott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 97
Default

Hi there,

That sword is a pattern 1822 Gothic hilted sword with pipe-back or quill-back blade. The cypher undoubtedly is from the era of William 4th but the previous ones I've seen have the IV superimposed on the initials WR, so yours is unusual. I think I see flaming grenades, which may be an artillery variation? Later artillery officers had their own pattern, whereas this is typically an Infantry officers sword.
You see plenty with Victorian cypher but Wiliam ones are pretty scarce.
As to scabbard condition, you're lucky that the leather has survived at all. A nice sword.
I've not encountered swords with their manufacture date shown, so would suggest that the date relates to the officer's commission or similar?
Kind regards,

Kevin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-17, 08:10 AM
Paul Spellman's Avatar
Paul Spellman Paul Spellman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 2,359
Default

Found these snippets on R.Luard RA after a quick google search.
The top gives you his d.o.b. and d.o.d
He's was promoted to 2nd Lt from Gentleman Cadet in Dec 1819
Also promoted to Major in Dec 1854
Hopefully someone with the resources can use these dates to research your man.
Paul
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_8303.jpg (65.7 KB, 24 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-05-17, 08:34 AM
Cribyn's Avatar
Cribyn Cribyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales
Posts: 1,718
Default

Hello Kevin

Did you really mean that the cypher is that of William IV? It looks far more like that for George IV to me. William IV cyphers usually have a far more distinctive 'W' in them whereas the one on this sword seems to have 'GR' reversed and entwined.

The date of the sword 1823 would be right for George IV (1820-1830) but too early for William IV (1830-1837), although it is not unknown for swords to be re-hilted.

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-05-17, 06:46 PM
GTB's Avatar
GTB GTB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Malta
Posts: 2,645
Default

Kevin,

what you apparently see as flaming grenades, I believe are actually the floriate adornment of the cypher.

Roger,
I must say that the cypher leaves much to be desired - I cannot in truth make out any reversed cypher at all

GTB
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-05-17, 08:04 PM
Cribyn's Avatar
Cribyn Cribyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Carmarthenshire, Wales
Posts: 1,718
Default

Hello GTB

I agree that the cypher is not the best I've ever seen - on a sword or button for that matter!

I compared the one in the photo here with other examples and George IV seems to be the closest match. All those of William IV that I could find (not that many I must admit) had a fairly clear 'W' visible. I thought I could just about make out a 'GR' reversed and entwined on the one here but can see no 'W' at all.

Must get my eyes tested again - booked in next week as it happens!!

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-05-17, 08:05 PM
Kevin Elliott Kevin Elliott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Isle of Wight
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cribyn View Post
Hello Kevin

Did you really mean that the cypher is that of William IV? It looks far more like that for George IV to me. William IV cyphers usually have a far more distinctive 'W' in them whereas the one on this sword seems to have 'GR' reversed and entwined.

The date of the sword 1823 would be right for George IV (1820-1830) but too early for William IV (1830-1837), although it is not unknown for swords to be re-hilted.

Roger
Yes Roger, George IV, my mistake. Sword pattern only introduced in 1822 and as you rightly say, the date on the sword puts it firmly in the G IV era.

The example(s) I had been looking at, on Harvey Withers site, was a WR IV cypher which threw me. Look at these and you'll see why...

https://www.antiqueswordsonline.com/...officer-sword/

The next is described as a William IV and looks to have the same cypher as the sword which the OP owns?

https://www.antiqueswordsonline.com/...fficers-sword/


Kevin.

Last edited by Kevin Elliott; 12-05-17 at 05:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-17, 07:35 PM
soldier1 soldier1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ste Julie QC Canada
Posts: 110
Default Sword Research

I would like to thank the members for their very informative posts ref subj.

We now have a concrete base to proceed on for further research.

My friend can pass the sword to his son with a history of the sword that has now come to light; thanks to you.

Cheers Al
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-05-17, 05:35 PM
soldier1 soldier1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ste Julie QC Canada
Posts: 110
Default Sword Research

Hi guys;

My friend has asked to pls pass on to you his thanks for the info given and has asked if he could ask a last favour.

Could anyone give us a link on this means so he could delve further into Lt Luard's history ref his family history (where born and what his parents did as an example) Perhaps a census site?

There is I believe there is an email link to British army archives that lists the service history of army personnel. Is it at the archives in Kew? I don't know. I also believe there is a cost associated for the info asked for?

Any further help would be much appreciated to wrap up this subj.

Cheers Al
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-05-17, 01:22 PM
54Bty's Avatar
54Bty 54Bty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 6,292
Default

From 'Kane's List of Officers'.

Robert LUARD, commissioned at 19yrs 1 month.
Gentleman Cadet 9th May 1815
2nd Lt on Half Pay 5th December 1819, joined his Regiment 11th December 1820
1st Lt 12th May 1827
Capt 20th May 1839
Brevet Maj 28th Nov 1854
Retired on Half Pay 17th January 1845
Died at Tonbridge 2nd November 1880

Marc
__________________
I am still looking for British Army cloth Formation, Regimental, Battalion, Company and other Unit sleeve badges, from 1980 onwards.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-05-17, 02:06 PM
soldier1 soldier1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ste Julie QC Canada
Posts: 110
Default Sword Research

Thank you very much Marc.

Cheers Al
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.