British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Royal Flying Corps and Royal Air Force

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-03-16, 11:07 AM
JON188's Avatar
JON188 JON188 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,657
Default Grouping

Frank I think if you read my original post I used the word as grouping (various items coming together in 1 group - fair use of the word group I think?)
At the time I assumed they were original, BUT, I did put in the original post that i was unsure of the owner, due to the RAF cap badge in the picture.
So no reference has been made suggesting 100% that this was an original grouping, and that is why I put the pieces up here to gain the experience from you members more knowledgeable in this field.
regards
Jon
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-03-16, 05:13 PM
SAS1 SAS1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,383
Default

Frank

In 1944 the ATA did recruit pilots direct from the WAAF for the first time, as by then they had their own training establishments and syllabus, whereas prior to that they recruited only qualified pilots, both male and female.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-03-16, 08:52 PM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

Hello Jon,
Okay, please forgive me being rather presumptive, my own thoughts are simply that if buying any WW2 group, you must get as much supporting documentation as possible, without it, you are left only with the basic value of each item within the group, as here, but, only as long as the same are original, of course.
Kind regards Frank.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JON188 View Post
Frank I think if you read my original post I used the word as grouping (various items coming together in 1 group - fair use of the word group I think?)
At the time I assumed they were original, BUT, I did put in the original post that i was unsure of the owner, due to the RAF cap badge in the picture.
So no reference has been made suggesting 100% that this was an original grouping, and that is why I put the pieces up here to gain the experience from you members more knowledgeable in this field.
regards
Jon
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-03-16, 09:19 PM
Phil2M's Avatar
Phil2M Phil2M is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 6,315
Default

Nothing concrete, mate. Its just a general bird design i have seen used in a lot of modern badges. I am in no position to judge authenticity, just making the observation.
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts."
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 21-04-16, 08:38 AM
SAS1 SAS1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,383
Default

I saw that you put the group up on ebay. Not sure how much you got for it but they are now up for a pretty penny on the Mons Militaria site - wings and cap badge alone at over £700.00!!!

And they're still repro!

http://www.monsmilitaryantiques.co.uk/shop.php
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 21-04-16, 10:23 AM
JON188's Avatar
JON188 JON188 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,657
Default

I've left messages with him Alex to inform him.
What can one do?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 21-04-16, 02:40 PM
SAS1 SAS1 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,383
Default

That's the best you can do Jon.

There was another on the other day on a dealers site at £200 or so. I pointed out it was one of 'Warhats' aged ones you can buy on ebay at £18.00. He said he'd got it from an auction house so long ago he'd not be able to do anything about it. But they've only been appearing on ebay a few weeks...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 22-04-16, 07:10 AM
Frank Kelley's Avatar
Frank Kelley Frank Kelley is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 7,562
Default

I find this sort of thing, really awful underhand behaviour, but, I suppose, the idiots that actually make them in the first place must bare the most responsibility!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 22-04-16, 03:11 PM
MH331 MH331 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,190
Default

To be fair to Richard at Mons he has removed the items from his site and put a note on his mesage board to that effect. I have known Richard for over 30 years and I can vouch that he would never knowingly sell a reproduction unless it was listed as such.

regards

Mark
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 22-04-16, 04:39 PM
JON188's Avatar
JON188 JON188 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,657
Default

Richard returned my call and I managed to provide the pictures of the stuff I had.
He had bought them from a reliable source of his too.
So all in all he asked very professionally.
It's nice to see as some dealers would not have returned my call with a view to clarifying.
My opinion is that actually they were NOT 100% guaranteed to be the same , but he pulled them anyway.
Regards
Jon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.