British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > British Military Insignia > Photographs of British Servicemen and Women Wearing Insignia

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 03-04-24, 07:34 AM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
To clarify:

Originally ranked as a sergeant and chosen from within the battalion (and included as such by the Rifle Corps in 1800), the schoolmaster, more highly educated and qualified than almost all the other ranks (and very possibly some of the officers) had varied fortunes during the period. An essential reference for deeper study is the doctoral thesis by Elaine Ann Smith .

In 1811 all regiments were instructed to establish a schoolmaster to improve the education of the boy soldiers, the adult soldiers and the children borne on the strength. In 1846 two Royal Warrants formalised the instruction of sergeant schoolmasters, created the Corps of Army Schoolmasters, raised their pay to 2/6 and allowed an extra 6d for ‘efficiency and good conduct’.
Once the Corps was created they were essentially attached, not 'of'.

A warrant of 1854 further improved their status, indeed the most senior were junior only to commissioned officers, warranted, and thus senior to the sergeant major for a short period. They were not allowed executive command and did not go on active service although they did work with battalions or garrisons and cantonments all over the expanding empire.

1878 schoolmasters were posted to locations not units. (RACD).

Thereafter they do not appear in any of the Peace or War battalion establishments I have in hand.

In unit portraits they are the most frequent absentees if any.
Yes that is more aligned with what I recalled from this linked history that I previously found most useful as a point of reference. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprin...6/1/283368.pdf
A very significant change was brought about when state schooling was improved sufficiently that it was no longer felt necessary for soldiers in barracks to attend compulsory lessons on a weekly basis in literacy and numeracy. From that point the focus shifted away from individual battalions and more to the garrison schools.

Returning to the subject of the subject photo I still think that the oddly dressed individual is most likely the schoolmaster associated with the battalion. He was probably a member of the mess, as he was required to be member of a sergeants’ mess by Queen’s Regulations and few garrisons had central sergeants’ messes.

Last edited by Toby Purcell; 03-04-24 at 07:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-04-24, 10:21 AM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby Purcell View Post
Yes that is more aligned with what I recalled from this linked history that I previously found most useful as a point of reference. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprin...6/1/283368.pdf
A very significant change was brought about when state schooling was improved sufficiently that it was no longer felt necessary for soldiers in barracks to attend compulsory lessons on a weekly basis in literacy and numeracy. From that point the focus shifted away from individual battalions and more to the garrison schools.

Returning to the subject of the subject photo I still think that the oddly dressed individual is most likely the schoolmaster associated with the battalion. He was probably a member of the mess, as he was required to be member of a sergeants’ mess by Queen’s Regulations and few garrisons had central sergeants’ messes.
He did better than belong to a battalion Mess.
QVR 1893 VII. 130:
Army schoolmasters, when posted to a garrison school, will be honorary members of the Sergeants Messes of the units whose men attend the school; they will not be required to pay any entrance fees in respect of this advantage.
Thus one man might appear in several unit group photos.

This was done similarly in JHQ BFG Rheindahlen; I was a member of the RAF Officers' Mess, the Army Mess, and the Civvy Officers' Mess but only paid Mess subs [at extortionate Group Captain rates] to the RAF Mess.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-04-24, 02:26 PM
Toby Purcell's Avatar
Toby Purcell Toby Purcell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Completed colour service and retired
Posts: 3,208
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
He did better than belong to a battalion Mess.
QVR 1893 VII. 130:
Army schoolmasters, when posted to a garrison school, will be honorary members of the Sergeants Messes of the units whose men attend the school; they will not be required to pay any entrance fees in respect of this advantage.
Thus one man might appear in several unit group photos.

This was done similarly in JHQ BFG Rheindahlen; I was a member of the RAF Officers' Mess, the Army Mess, and the Civvy Officers' Mess but only paid Mess subs [at extortionate Group Captain rates] to the RAF Mess.
That doesn’t surprise me in the least and still applies to some appointments as you’ve pointed out. I doubt though that the schoolmaster appeared in every single unit photograph and, although a member of all messes within the garrison, it’s more likely that he had a favoured watering hole and a unit with which he felt most at home. That might be for all kinds of reasons ranging from a national sense of identity (Scots, Irish, etc.), to having originally been with the regiment and subsequently transferring to be a schoolmaster. New recruits to the corps came from a mix of civilians with suitable civilian qualifications to SNCOs who attended courses of education to fit themselves for transfer, as explained in the history thesis that I attached.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-04-24, 04:22 PM
grumpy grumpy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toby Purcell View Post
That doesn’t surprise me in the least and still applies to some appointments as you’ve pointed out. I doubt though that the schoolmaster appeared in every single unit photograph and, although a member of all messes within the garrison, it’s more likely that he had a favoured watering hole and a unit with which he felt most at home. That might be for all kinds of reasons ranging from a national sense of identity (Scots, Irish, etc.), to having originally been with the regiment and subsequently transferring to be a schoolmaster. New recruits to the corps came from a mix of civilians with suitable civilian qualifications to SNCOs who attended courses of education to fit themselves for transfer, as explained in the history thesis that I attached.

Yes, as I said upstream:

An essential reference for deeper study is the doctoral thesis by Elaine Ann Smith. I summarized it in my recent book.
.
Malta just before the Great war had five battalions and six WO schoolmasters, plus NCO schoolies

Last edited by grumpy; 10-04-24 at 03:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.