British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum

Recent Books by Forum Members

   

Go Back   British & Commonwealth Military Badge Forum > Other Commonwealth Military Insignia > Indian Badges

 Other Pages: Galleries, Links etc.
Glossary  Books by Forum Members     Canadian Pre 1914    CEF    CEF Badge Inscriptions   Canadian post 1920     Canadian post 1953     British Cavalry Badges     Makers' Marks    Pipers' Badges  Canadian Cloth Titles  Books  SEARCH
 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-15, 03:27 PM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default Dominion of India slip on titles?

I have posted this thread on the British Badges forum, regarding an Australian made BD blouse I have bought sometime ago sporting quite puzzling insignia. On the epaulette two printed canvas slip on loops can be found, which read: "D o I / RLYS". I had originally came to the conclusion that they should be read as "Department of Industry - Railways". The BD blouse sports the rank chevrons of a corporal, the ribbon of the Territorial Efficiency Medal provided with rosette (I do not know the meaning of the rosette) while the WD Broad Arrows are superimposed on F.S. instead than on WD. I have been suggested that D o I could be read as "Dominion of India" and the fashion of the printed slip on loops some how reminds that of the WWII Indian Army slip on titles. In this case F.S. could stand for "Foreign Service"? Any help would be thoroughly appreciated!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg BD_Dpt_Ind_Rlwys_A_1.jpg (75.9 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg BD_Dpt_Ind_Rlwys_A_2.jpg (72.7 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg BD_Dpt_Ind_Rlwys_Tag.jpg (106.6 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-08-15, 10:16 AM
peter monahan peter monahan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,406
Default

As the Dominion of India existed only from August 1947 to January 1950, I'd think that an unlikely answer, but of course it's possible. Dept or Directorate of Industry, or something like it, strikes me as more likely.

No idea of the meaning of 'F.S.' I'm afraid. perhaps one of the members with Aussie expertise can assist.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-08-15, 01:39 PM
Postwarden's Avatar
Postwarden Postwarden is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Garden of England
Posts: 3,232
Default

I have posted an identification on the badges on this BD on the original British Badges thread.

Jon
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-08-15, 03:00 PM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Postwarden View Post
I have posted an identification on the badges on this BD on the original British Badges thread.

Jon
Thank you Jon!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-08-15, 10:25 AM
peter monahan peter monahan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,406
Default

Here it is in a nut shell, from Jon's post elsewhere.

"The epaulette slip-on is that of the Railways Section of the Defence of India Corps, formed in India in 1943. This consisted largely of the civilian employees of India's Docks and Railways who were mobilised in a non-combatant role to work with the Military units of the Royal Indian Engineers operating the railways and ports in the Lines of Communication supplying operations in Burma."

Thanks, Jon.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-08-15, 03:19 PM
Bill Harris Bill Harris is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Default

Hi, yes I concur, it strikes me as likely the Defence of India Corps. As mentioned they oversaw vital docks and railways, and also the Posts and Telegraphs Department. I'd say that's a very nice piece you've got there, and probably one that's not easy to find these days.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-08-15, 12:23 PM
peter monahan peter monahan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,406
Default

Yes, probably quite rare, though undoubtedly not uncommon during the war. One tends to forget how large the support element, military and otherwise, is in any modern military enterprise, from factories to civil defence groups to dock and railway workers. Hard to put a value on this, but it is an unusual piece with an interesting background.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-09-15, 08:58 AM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default

still there is the matter of the F.S. superimposed by the Broad Arrow: could they stand for "Foreign Service"?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17-09-15, 02:29 PM
peter monahan peter monahan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,406
Default

Not a specialist in markings but I would have thought it unlikely to stamp an item as 'foreign service' unless it were a particular mark/model not issued for home service and even then it seems a bit odd. I suspect itm is either a maker's mark or a stores stamp of some sort, possible the latter as its clearly a post manufacture over stamp.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-09-15, 10:26 AM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter monahan View Post
Not a specialist in markings but I would have thought it unlikely to stamp an item as 'foreign service' unless it were a particular mark/model not issued for home service and even then it seems a bit odd. I suspect itm is either a maker's mark or a stores stamp of some sort, possible the latter as its clearly a post manufacture over stamp.
thank you Peter, quite an interesting analysis...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 18-09-15, 06:37 PM
fairlie63's Avatar
fairlie63 fairlie63 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Claremont, Tasmania
Posts: 1,368
Default

Out of curiosity, what identifies this clothing item as of Australian manufacture?

Keith
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-10-15, 02:33 PM
loupie1961 loupie1961 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fairlie63 View Post
Out of curiosity, what identifies this clothing item as of Australian manufacture?

Keith
i have assumed it form the shape and size of the tag, but as a matter of fact I haven't got any definitive evidence!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

mhs link

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.